![]() |
Quote:
And unless you threw Dieng out there just to prove a point that Wiggins is more valuable than I'm making him out to be, that's pretty uninformed. A player like Dieng isn't somebody you just trade away just so you can get Andrew Wiggins. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I'd just wait until the deadline when we won't have to greatly overpay. If they demand Wiggins we should demand Dieng.
|
Cavs don't need Love when Marcus Fizer is available.
|
Quote:
You are the dumbest mother****er on the planet. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
5 stars. |
Quote:
Love is a top 10 player in the NBA and it's not debatable. Asking for more on the Cavs end is laughable. And no, at the trade deadline, you will have to pony up more. You're not paying less then. Teams will just rent Love for 3 months and go all out. |
Great. That doesn't change the fact that his contract is expiring, he's made it known he wants out, and he's walking from Minnesota regardless. You guys are reeruned if you don't know that brings down the trade value. Maybe do some research and see what guys like Howard and Harden were traded for?
|
Quote:
It doesn't bring his trade value down when he has multiple suitors. And he'll have more at the trade deadline. Howard was traded for actually a lot of value, but I don't expect you to know shit about the NBA. Harden was an absurd trade and using that as some benchmark in a negotiation is absurd. You're really showing your ass in this thread. |
But the Cavs have the most to gain and the most to lose by acquiring Love so it's smart to make Saunders force that team to overpay or get market value versus maybe a team that wants to rent him for 3 months at the trade deadline if they feel they are close to make a run in the playoffs. That team wouldnt have to pay as much but he's not going to just give him to the Cavs for their shit overrated players.
|
LMAO
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:47 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.