Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17757256)

That's my thought as well. They 100% have to add somebody. If they were just going to settle for somebody like that, they would've been very agressive to get him.

It also probably means that they're looking for a particular type, not just anybody.

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 17757286)

I get it. And I also want the same thing. But here’s the thing: we have a dozen years to capture all those rings. We may have just this one shot to get the threepeat. I’m okay with sacrificing the next two-three seasons out of the next 12 to secure the ultimate “in-your-face Belichick-Brady!!!!” trophy of all-time. Ymmv.

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 17757291)

MMDV.

But I understand your stance.

I think they're looking to do SOMETHING, I just doubt it's a blockbuster type deal.

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 17757288)

An empty uniform that runs 4.4 is still an empty uniform.

The 'deep threat' that can't catch isn't anything that moves the needle, in my opinion. We have Worthy and Hardman to run those routes, and Worthy can actually catch and track the ball.

Slayton, maybe. Diontae, sure.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 17757269)

We have no clue what's actually happening. For all we know, the Bills just straight up outbid them. There's plenty of options out there. The question is which ones are actually real. We don't know and probably never will.

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17757300)

“Teams won’t deal with the chiefs”

They’ve made trades at the last 2 deadlines

Maybe 3?

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 17757305)

If you're a team that's going to sell, you aren't worried about the Chiefs. Hell, I'd argue you're better off helping the Chiefs get better this year while taking a hit long term losing the draft pick.

Originally Posted by Nirvana58 (Post 17757304)

If the Bills outbid them then we didn't try very hard. As the Bills gave up what less than a 3rd rounder.

So theoretically we could of gotten him for our 3rd straight up.

If we don't have a trade in place and are just sitting on our hands. That is a huge mistake.

Originally Posted by Nirvana58 (Post 17757304)

If the Bills outbid them then we didn't try very hard. As the Bills gave up what less than a 3rd rounder.

So theoretically we could of gotten him for our 3rd straight up.

If we don't have a trade in place and are just sitting on our hands. That is a huge mistake.

Originally Posted by Basileus777 (Post 17757295)

Skyy Moore got 33 snaps despite them playing extra TEs as much as possible, that's 33 plays where the Chiefs essentially had 4 eligible receivers. You cannot say they do not need a productive body.

Originally Posted by Nirvana58 (Post 17757069)

I mean the Bills just traded for Cooper and it didn't cost them an arm and a leg. You can't pretend there haven't been options out there.

Originally Posted by Nirvana58 (Post 17757304)

If the Bills outbid them then we didn't try very hard. As the Bills gave up what less than a 3rd rounder.

So theoretically we could of gotten him for our 3rd straight up.

If we don't have a trade in place and are just sitting on our hands. That is a huge mistake.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 17757330)

Yeah I'm sure they're just sitting on their hands. ROFL