ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs ****Jaguars @ Chiefs****

He would have at least checked it down to open RBs and to Hill. How many YAC did we have today compared to normal? Or are you going to say the checkdowns weren't open either? Our longest drive was THIRTY EIGHT YARDS. And even before Maclin and Kelce left we still weren't moving the ball. So why does he get an excuse there too?

He also wouldn't have thrown that TD to Wilson.

KChiefs1

11-06-2016 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sandy Cheeks (Post 12533778)

KC offense had 10 first downs... the whole game... and a WIN!!!! lol

Damn that Nick Foles is awesome!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Franchise

11-06-2016 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 12533779)

You mean 1-0.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

2-0. Smith didn't play more than 50% of that Colts game.

KChiefs1

11-06-2016 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12533781)

He also wouldn't have thrown that TD to Wilson.

But he would have to Hill.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Franchise

11-06-2016 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 12533788)

But he would have to Hill.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Touché. I'll give you that one.

-King-

11-06-2016 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12533781)

He also wouldn't have thrown that TD to Wilson.

Yeah...oh wait, he did to Maclin last week and to Hill the week before. So....

The Franchise

11-06-2016 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12533803)

Yeah...oh wait, he did to Maclin last week and to Hill the week before. So....

2 in 10 years. Foles had 2 in 2 games.

-King-

11-06-2016 03:59 PM

The pass I'll give Foles is the pass to Kelce to start the game. Other than that one pass, Alex could have made every other pass he made and would have been more efficient and would have noticed the checkdowns.

Anyong Bluth

11-06-2016 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 12533663)

There were many checkdown opportunities and he would have made the TD pass to Hill. Foles has no awareness of underneath routes and his footwork is horrible so he throws 100mph on the off chance he does see a WR open underneath. There were a few replays where the commentator pointed out West coming open in the flats and Foles just ignored them.

Smith would have completed 65-60% of his passes and would have had at least 2 TDs that game. I mean shit, we didn't even have one real drive all game, that's pathetic.

Gtfo if you're going to post well reasoned, articulate responses!

Mr. Laz

11-06-2016 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 12533788)

But he would have to Hill.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

or Maclin or Kelce

but whatever, he has never given a shit about reality ... too busy bitching like a toddler

-King-

11-06-2016 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12533808)

2 in 10 years. Foles had 2 in 2 games.

2 in two games in a row in an offense that we've seen be more aggressive lately. I'll take that plus the efficiency Smith has shown.

The Franchise

11-06-2016 04:00 PM

It's funny. I'm not saying that Foles played great.....because he didn't. But Smith fluffers don't get to use excuses for Smith and then rag on Foles for the same bullshit.

Anyong Bluth

11-06-2016 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 12533708)

Bortles had his full compliment of weapons and still sucked ass.

Not when they were playing hot potato every time he threw them the ball.

Mr. Laz

11-06-2016 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12533770)

Smith suits Reid's offensive philosophy perfectly.

Foles doesn't.

truth

Bray doesn't fit either, not sure why we are wasting our time with him either. Best we can hope for is to develop and trade him.