ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs on verge of a deal with Andy Reid (merged) (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=268357)

ILChief 01-02-2013 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradBigglestein (Post 9269317)
The Vick decision was apparently his. No one knows for sure, but that is what was agreed upon publicly by the organization. He had to sell Jeff Lurie on it, but Lurie was fine with giving him a chance.

The line was good last year. This year it sucked because they lost Jason Peters who was a top 3 lineman last year, lost Todd Herremans this year, lost Jason Kelce this year. A ton of injuries. Also Danny Watkins our former first round pick sucks. That is on Reid, he gives the final say in personnel and it was a bad pick.

So it is a mix. Lacking talent, injuries.

Well Vick was brought in to back up Mcnabb and kolb

ChiefMojo 01-02-2013 03:32 PM

The situation we are in right now, trying to sell the fanbase a assistant coach is pretty damn hard to do. Not only that we aren't in a situation where we can hand the reigns over to someone that is learning on the job.

This new HC role will be someone of power. They will make decisions just as much as the GM. They will report directly to Clark, not the GM. Basically we will be hiring a GM that works hand and hand to what the HC wants. We need someone with experience to fix this mess! That is why we are after Andy Reid. Is he perfect? Hell no, but he has proven to be a winner and fits exactly the role that Clark Hunts wants in his next head coach. Unless he can convince Bill Cowher to come, your looking only at a handful of other guys capable of fitting the role described... guys like Holmgren, Gruden, Billick, etc.

TEX 01-02-2013 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9269320)
You do not understand what I was getting at.

Ask Dane. He was very optimistic about this team during training camp.

Just like a lot of us.

Oh - Ok....

ToxSocks 01-02-2013 03:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269308)
The Chiefs have a number of holes that can't be filled in one offseason. Their defense is in major flux and they need help not only on the defensive line but ILB and safety. They have issues at WR, LT, QB and TE and need depth everywhere.

Arizona's defense has played well. There's no question about their scheme. The help they need, outside of QB, can be easily upgraded in the draft. They're much closer to competing.

The 2013 Chiefs are the 2008 Chiefs before the draft. What happens this April will have a huge impact over the next four years. They're teetering on the brink of being irrelevant for four more years if they **** up.

Once again, because you are a Chiefs fan, you can sit there and call out all of our holes, but i dont believe for a second that a 4-12 football team is in much better shape than a 2-16 team.

No, the Cardinals aren't much closer to competing. You of all people know that the QB makes the biggest difference, and we are in a better spot to land the top prospect.

You can't sit there and shrug off the Cardinal's needs and say they are an easy fix while saying our needs are difficult to fix, when in fact, they are just as easy to fill.

BigMeatballDave 01-02-2013 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269311)
No, you're trying to be funny, and failing miserably.

90% of this board thought this team was winning 10+ games, but feel free to crucify one guy over it.

Being funny?

I said I thought they had the talent to win 10.

I confessed my mistake week 2.

DeezNutz 01-02-2013 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269273)
I do as well. And not because they're afraid to draft a QB, but because there isn't a QB worthy of the top spot.

I really don't like to engage in this type of conversation until after The Combines but I think it's a strong possibility that the Chiefs choose something other than a QB at the #1 overall spot. A trade, a different position, etc. wouldn't shock me at all on January 3, 2013.

That, of course, is subject to change after the Combines.

We've heard what the talking heads have to say about the QB class, but I have no read on how scouts and personnel people are breaking it down.

The crux is that this draft class, as a whole, looks like it's going to be deep but not particularly top heavy. The QB class is deep, too, so it's entirely possible that the new HC/GM will believe that the guy he could reasonably get at the top of round 2 would be similar to the guy whom he could get at 1/1.

I expect a vet to be brought in, in addition to a QB in either round 1 or 2.

ToxSocks 01-02-2013 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269312)
Right. But so far, there's no indication that Reid is demanding personnel control.

Either way, I've heard from a good source that they're targeting Arians as their #1 guy.

Well, Arians thus far has been the ONLY guy that's been linked to them. But, word is that they want a GM first, and if that GM is onboard with Arians, then he will be the guy they pursue.

Fansy the Famous Bard 01-02-2013 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9269307)
That has nothing to do with what I'm referring to.

Most his replies are constructed that way.

The Franchise 01-02-2013 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9269324)
Ha...good luck with that one, Bill's kid.

If Horton gets passed over as HC, someone will hire him to be the top dog. Hell, Buffalo would be a good fit, presuming they don't go hard after Lovie. SD might be looking for a different type of coach as well; Horton might be a nice fit there to instill a more aggressive attitude after such a laid back rube in Norv.

Nah, I can't see any way Bidwell is able to keep Horton, if for no other reason than Horton is going to want to interview elsewhere and Reid is going to want to get his staff in place and is not going to want to wait for the owner's hand-picked DC to make up his mind.

I wouldn't rule out Chicago either.

BradBigglestein 01-02-2013 03:35 PM

If Andy Reid is your coach, he will make it his #1 priority to get your offensive line fixed, and find your team a QB. Andy Reid doesn't mess around in those two areas.

The coaching staff he assembled this year was a joke, but when he first came here, he had one of the best coaching staffs in the NFL. All the coaches that came from his staff: Leslie Frazier, Brad Childress, John Harbaugh, Pat Shurmur, Steve Spagnuolo, etc. I'm sure in a fresh situation, he'd put a good staff together. Also, he picked Jim Johnson who was a great coordinator, and good position coaches.

Rasputin 01-02-2013 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Flopnuts (Post 9269298)
The Iron Sheik must be pissed Reid is no longer in Philly.

That sounds like the Iron Sheik would say
NSFW!!!
<iframe width="640" height="360" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/9K-wEUCCvE0?feature=player_embedded" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

DaneMcCloud 01-02-2013 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9269333)
Once again, because you are a Chiefs fan, you can sit there and call out all of our holes, but i dont believe for a second that a 4-12 football team is in much better shape than a 2-16 team.

No, the Cardinals aren't much closer to competing. You of all people know that the QB makes the biggest difference, and we are in a better spot to land the top prospect.

You can't sit there and shrug off the Cardinal's needs and say they are an easy fix while saying our needs are difficult to fix, when in fact, they are just as easy to fill.

Really? So finding three starting offensive lineman is the same as finding three starting defensive lineman? Finding a RB or two late in the draft is the same as finding a #1 and #2 receiver? In which universe do you live?

Arizona can easily fill their offensive line and running back holes in one offseason. Whether it's Kolb or a second rounder or Alex Smith or Joe Flacco, the Cards are poised to reach the playoffs much more quickly than the Chiefs, which have holes everywhere along with a lack of depth.

The Franchise 01-02-2013 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269345)
Really? So finding three starting offensive lineman is the same as finding three starting defensive lineman? Finding a RB or two late in the draft is the same as finding a #1 and #2 receiver? In which universe do you live?

Arizona can easily fill their offensive line and running back holes in one offseason. Whether it's Kolb or a second rounder or Alex Smith or Joe Flacco, the Cards are poised to reach the playoffs much more quickly than the Chiefs, which have holes everywhere along with a lack of depth.

You really think it'd be an easy road in the NFC West? You have to assume that whichever team finishes 2nd in that division is going to be a wildcard. San Francisco and Seattle own that division right now.

ToxSocks 01-02-2013 03:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9269339)
We've heard what the talking heads have to say about the QB class, but I have no read on how scouts and personnel people are breaking it down.

The crux is that this draft class, as a whole, looks like it's going to be deep but not particularly top heavy. The QB class is deep, too, so it's entirely possible that the new HC/GM will believe that the guy he could reasonably get at the top of round 2 would be similar to the guy whom he could get at 1/1.

I expect a vet to be brought in, in addition to a QB in either round 1 or 2.

It's going to be a 1st round QB. To think otherwise, is overthinking it. We've all been around long enough to know how this shit works. Between now and the next few months, a Qb prospect WILL rise up the boards. It happens every year.

Everyone wants to talk about how Clark wants to put butts in the seats.

Best way to do it? Shiny new 1st round QB.

Biggest hole on the team? QB

Most important position on a team? QB.

Highest valued position in the draft? Qb.

New HC? new QB...

I mean....this isn't rocket science, people.

Straight, No Chaser 01-02-2013 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9269324)
Ha...good luck with that one, Bill's kid.

If Horton gets passed over as HC, someone will hire him to be the top dog. Hell, Buffalo would be a good fit, presuming they don't go hard after Lovie. SD might be looking for a different type of coach as well; Horton might be a nice fit there to instill a more aggressive attitude after such a laid back rube in Norv.

Nah, I can't see any way Bidwell is able to keep Horton, if for no other reason than Horton is going to want to interview elsewhere and Reid is going to want to get his staff in place and is not going to want to wait for the owner's hand-picked DC to make up his mind.

I see Horton getting some interest, in part because of the Rooney rule, but am doubtful he gets an offer this year. The Cards D started out on fire but it ended badly for them overall this year; players' attitudes were toxic the last couple of weeks.

DaneMcCloud 01-02-2013 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9269339)
We've heard what the talking heads have to say about the QB class, but I have no read on how scouts and personnel people are breaking it down.

The crux is that this draft class, as a whole, looks like it's going to be deep but not particularly top heavy. The QB class is deep, too, so it's entirely possible that the new HC/GM will believe that the guy he could reasonably get at the top of round 2 would be similar to the guy whom he could get at 1/1.

I expect a vet to be brought in, in addition to a QB in either round 1 or 2.

I can't recall a year in which the QB position was in such a state of flux as this draft year appears to be at this point.

It seems like there's been a clear cut #1 guy each year but this year, it's just a puzzle. No one stands above the other players and no one particularly stands out, period, especially when compared to 2009 (Stafford), 2010 (Bradford), 2011 (Cam Newton) and 2012 (Luck & RGIII).

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2013 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269345)
Really? So finding three starting offensive lineman is the same as finding three starting defensive lineman? Finding a RB or two late in the draft is the same as finding a #1 and #2 receiver? In which universe do you live?

Arizona can easily fill their offensive line and running back holes in one offseason. Whether it's Kolb or a second rounder or Alex Smith or Joe Flacco, the Cards are poised to reach the playoffs much more quickly than the Chiefs, which have holes everywhere along with a lack of depth.

This is a really good point.

DL, CB and WR are historically tougher positions to fill.

RB's are a dime-a-dozen. Don't have to use high picks on OL either.

-King- 01-02-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9269289)
Bob Fescoe ‏@bobfescoe

If falcons lose their pro personnel director to JAX look for Pioli to possibly b reunited w his buddy Dimitrioff in ATL. makes sense 2 me

Once again, we find ourselves rooting for Jacksonville.

DeezNutz 01-02-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 9269349)
It's going to be a 1st round QB. To think otherwise, is overthinking it. We've all been around long enough to know how this shit works. Between now and the next few months, a Qb prospect WILL rise up the boards. It happens every year.

Everyone wants to talk about how Clark wants to put butts in the seats.

Best way to do it? Shiny new 1st round QB.

Biggest hole on the team? QB

Most important position on a team? QB.

Highest valued position in the draft? Qb.

New HC? new QB...

I mean....this isn't rocket science, people.

While this board would melt the **** down, hiring a big-name coach and acquiring a QB whom the general public knows, like a Flacco (should he come available), will put asses in the seats.

You think the average fan knows who Geno Smith is? I don't. Perhaps the name, but they don't know shit about the player, and they've never seen him play.

DaneMcCloud 01-02-2013 03:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9269348)
You really think it'd be an easy road in the NFC West? You have to assume that whichever team finishes 2nd in that division is going to be a wildcard. San Francisco and Seattle own that division right now.

I'm looking more in terms of filling holes and competing for a WC as opposed to filling holes and competing for the division.

The Chiefs have far more holes to fill than Arizona, IMO.

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2013 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9269289)
Bob Fescoe ‏@bobfescoe

If falcons lose their pro personnel director to JAX look for Pioli to possibly b reunited w his buddy Dimitrioff in ATL. makes sense 2 me

WHY THE **** DID CLARK TAKE PIOLI TO ATLANTA?

RunKC 01-02-2013 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269345)
Really? So finding three starting offensive lineman is the same as finding three starting defensive lineman? Finding a RB or two late in the draft is the same as finding a #1 and #2 receiver? In which universe do you live?

Arizona can easily fill their offensive line and running back holes in one offseason. Whether it's Kolb or a second rounder or Alex Smith or Joe Flacco, the Cards are poised to reach the playoffs much more quickly than the Chiefs, which have holes everywhere along with a lack of depth.

The Cards don't stand a chance of making the playoffs anytime soon. The 49ers are the best team in the NFC, the Seahawks have a very good young team with a good GM and the Rams are looking very good for where they are.

I wouldn't be surprised if every team in that division, except Arizona, wins 8 or more games next season.

We only have Denver. Raiders and Chargers are toast if we get Reid and the AFC is weaker than the NFC both now and in the future. Brady and Manning have like 2 or 3 years left and Ravens are quickly falling.

DeezNutz 01-02-2013 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269360)
WHY THE **** DID CLARK TAKE PIOLI TO ATLANTA?

You're going to all caps a response to a Fescoe tweet? This guy can't even wipe his own ass.

-King- 01-02-2013 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269359)
I'm looking more in terms of filling holes and competing for a WC as opposed to filling holes and competing for the division.

The Chiefs have far more holes to fill than Arizona, IMO.

:rolleyes:

notorious 01-02-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradBigglestein (Post 9269317)
The Vick decision was apparently his. No one knows for sure, but that is what was agreed upon publicly by the organization. He had to sell Jeff Lurie on it, but Lurie was fine with giving him a chance.

The line was good last year. This year it sucked because they lost Jason Peters who was a top 3 lineman last year, lost Todd Herremans this year, lost Jason Kelce this year. A ton of injuries. Also Danny Watkins our former first round pick sucks. That is on Reid, he gives the final say in personnel and it was a bad pick.

So it is a mix. Lacking talent, injuries.

Thanks. I wish some of the other poster here would stop arguing and ask you some more questions.

The Franchise 01-02-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269354)
I can't recall a year in which the QB position was in such a state of flux as this draft year appears to be at this point.

It seems like there's been a clear cut #1 guy each year but this year, it's just a puzzle. No one stands above the other players and no one particularly stands out, period, especially when compared to 2009 (Stafford), 2010 (Bradford), 2011 (Cam Newton) and 2012 (Luck & RGIII).

Cam Newton was not thought of as the #1 overall pick this soon before the draft.

DaneMcCloud 01-02-2013 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9269368)
:rolleyes:

Thanks for your input, King Dipshit.

DeezNutz 01-02-2013 03:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9269372)
Cam Newton was not thought of as the #1 overall pick this soon before the draft.

Not by fans. That's for sure.

Fans thought it might be Clausen, but we saw how scouts viewed him.

DaneMcCloud 01-02-2013 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9269372)
Cam Newton was not thought of as the #1 overall pick this soon before the draft.

Eh, you're probably right. He hadn't even won the national championship yet.

:D

But, you do understand my point that it's a jumbled mess right now regarding this class of QB's?

Marcellus 01-02-2013 03:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269360)
WHY THE **** DID CLARK TAKE PIOLI TO ATLANTA?

Sounds like he was hoping to drop him off.

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2013 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9269367)
You're going to all caps a response to a Fescoe tweet? This guy can't even wipe his own ass.

Just making a point.

No one knows WHY Pioli went on that trip or to what degree IF ANY he was involved.

Yet everyone is about to pass out from the loss of period blood.

Occam's ****ing razor. Buyout. Some really smart people are ignoring common sense and saying some really stupid shit today.

If Reid falls through, and Pioli is still here come February - then Clark's made it easy on everyone - walk away.

The Franchise 01-02-2013 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269378)
Eh, you're probably right. He hadn't even won the national championship yet.

:D

But, you do understand my point that it's a jumbled mess right now regarding this class of QB's?

I get your point.

But I also understand that after the Senior Bowl and the Combine.......a QB will rise to the top.

MGRS13 01-02-2013 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 9269356)
Once again, we find ourselves rooting for Jacksonville.

We can root all we want to. Pioli is with Clark doing interviews, not looking for a job. If Clark was going to fire him Pioli wouldn't be along for the ride. Not only will Pioli be the GM next year he is getting his say on who the head coach is. We will all have to wait another year to "start over"..... again.

ToxSocks 01-02-2013 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9269372)
Cam Newton was not thought of as the #1 overall pick this soon before the draft.

This. Same goes for RGIII.

There were Questions before the draft on whether or not the Falcons should take Dorsey over Ryan....

Same shit, different year.

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2013 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 9269370)
Thanks. I wish some of the other poster here would stop arguing and ask you some more questions.

This guy could be the ****ing Frankie or KCJohnny of EaglesPlanet, for all we know.

Fansy the Famous Bard 01-02-2013 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9269379)
Sounds like he was hoping to drop him off.

Do we have any reports of success\failure?

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2013 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9269379)
Sounds like he was hoping to drop him off.

Would have been my plan.

Thig Lyfe 01-02-2013 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradBigglestein (Post 9269317)
The Vick decision was apparently his. No one knows for sure, but that is what was agreed upon publicly by the organization. He had to sell Jeff Lurie on it, but Lurie was fine with giving him a chance.

The line was good last year. This year it sucked because they lost Jason Peters who was a top 3 lineman last year, lost Todd Herremans this year, lost Jason Kelce this year. A ton of injuries. Also Danny Watkins our former first round pick sucks. That is on Reid, he gives the final say in personnel and it was a bad pick.

So it is a mix. Lacking talent, injuries.

Thanks for the info.

*snaps neck*

We got what we needed, boys. Let's move out.

notorious 01-02-2013 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269387)
This guy could be the ****ing Frankie or KCJohnny of EaglesPlanet, for all we know.

His takes read different.

New blood can't hurt. If he fits here, he will stick around.

BigMeatballDave 01-02-2013 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MGRS13 (Post 9269384)
We can root all we want to. Pioli is with Clark doing interviews, not looking for a job. If Clark was going to fire him Pioli wouldn't be along for the ride. Not only will Pioli be the GM next year he is getting his say on who the head coach is. We will all have to wait another year to "start over"..... again.

:facepalm:

DeezNutz 01-02-2013 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269382)
Just making a point.

No one knows WHY Pioli went on that trip or to what degree IF ANY he was involved.

Yet everyone is about to pass out from the loss of period blood.

Occam's ****ing razor. Buyout.
Some really smart people are ignoring common sense and saying some really stupid shit today.

If Reid falls through, and Pioli is still here come February - then Clark's made it easy on everyone - walk away.

I agree. It would seem like Pioli hasn't been officially fired because of buyout negotiations.

But this has absolutely no connection for why he'd be present or along for any interviews of any kind.

Hell, remember when Chan Gailey wasn't "officially fired"? He was essentially removed from 1 Arrowhead, but he was still the OC in name for a bit.

If you're working on a buyout with an individual who currently possesses no say or sway within your company, common sense says that the guy should probably be at home. Literally.

You don't use the company dime to give him a trip for ATL for any reason. None. That defies common sense on all levels.

DaneMcCloud 01-02-2013 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 9269383)
I get your point.

But I also understand that after the Senior Bowl and the Combine.......a QB will rise to the top.

I hope you're right.

I know that a lot of people here love certain guys (Bray, Wilson and Smith) but when I've watched them play, I must have caught them on bad days because none of those guys to me scream "Franchise QB".

FloridaMan88 01-02-2013 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269360)
WHY THE **** DID CLARK TAKE PIOLI TO ATLANTA?

Hopefully to try to dump him off on Dimitroff

mcaj22 01-02-2013 03:52 PM

im from PA and gave you the same answers about Reid that the Eagles fan did. and I love the Chiefs. one thing is for sure all Eagles fans are the same when it comes to their team

The Bad Guy 01-02-2013 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269345)
Really? So finding three starting offensive lineman is the same as finding three starting defensive lineman? Finding a RB or two late in the draft is the same as finding a #1 and #2 receiver? In which universe do you live?

Arizona can easily fill their offensive line and running back holes in one offseason. Whether it's Kolb or a second rounder or Alex Smith or Joe Flacco, the Cards are poised to reach the playoffs much more quickly than the Chiefs, which have holes everywhere along with a lack of depth.

I 1000% disagree that the Cardinals can fix their atrocious line in one offseason as well as find a QB in one offseason. They are a mess, much like we are. And I think finding 3-4 des really isn't that difficult of a proposition.

The Cardinals also have to compete with the 49ers and Seattle, 2 teams that will constantly be better than they are for the next 3-4 years without question.

tooge 01-02-2013 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269345)
Really? So finding three starting offensive lineman is the same as finding three starting defensive lineman? Finding a RB or two late in the draft is the same as finding a #1 and #2 receiver? In which universe do you live?

Arizona can easily fill their offensive line and running back holes in one offseason. Whether it's Kolb or a second rounder or Alex Smith or Joe Flacco, the Cards are poised to reach the playoffs much more quickly than the Chiefs, which have holes everywhere along with a lack of depth.

good post. The only caveat I would add is that we think the coaching at AZ was OK. We know the coaching in KC was terrible. IF, and it's a big IF, KC were to sign either Bowe or Albert, and franchise the other, AND, the KC improves the coaching and QB play, I think that KC is a better team.

One more point, regarding QB's. Part of the reason that there don't seem to be any QB's worthy of the first pick in the draft is that evaluators typically look for the "pro style" QB with the ability to play from under center and drop back and be a pocket passer. Well, times are a changin. Look at Russel Wilson, Kapaernick, RG3. The league is opening up to the idea of the spread offense and qbs that do most of their work out of the shotgun. I'm not so sure that a Geno Smith type guy isn't the prototypical QB the NFL has in 5 years.

Sorter 01-02-2013 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Thig Lyfe (Post 9269395)
Thanks for the info.

*snaps neck*

We got what we needed, boys. Let's move out.

http://i.imgur.com/R7tap.gif

penguinz 01-02-2013 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9269402)
I agree. It would seem like Pioli hasn't been officially fired because of buyout negotiations.

But this has absolutely no connection for why he'd be present or along for any interviews of any kind.

Hell, remember when Chan Gailey wasn't "officially fired"? He was essentially removed from 1 Arrowhead, but he was still the OC in name for a bit.

If you're working on a buyout with an individual who currently possesses no say or sway within your company, common sense says that the guy should probably be at home. Literally.

You don't use the company dime to give him a trip for ATL for any reason. None. That defies common sense on all levels.

Maybe his contract stipulates he has to be involved. If so Clark would be in breach of contract if he was not present during interviews.

Rugby Thompson 01-02-2013 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9269408)
I 1000% disagree that the Cardinals can fix their atrocious line in one offseason as well as find a QB in one offseason. They are a mess, much like we are. And I think finding 3-4 des really isn't that difficult of a proposition.

The Cardinals also have to compete with the 49ers and Seattle, 2 teams that will constantly be better than they are for the next 3-4 years without question.

The rams too are going to be a threat, that's going to be a tough division. He would have more success in KC, all you really have to worry about is denver

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2013 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9269402)
I agree. It would seem like Pioli hasn't been officially fired because of buyout negotiations.

But this has absolutely no connection for why he'd be present or along for any interviews of any kind.

Hell, remember when Chan Gailey wasn't "officially fired"? He was essentially removed from 1 Arrowhead, but he was still the OC in name for a bit.

If you're working on a buyout with an individual who currently possesses no say or sway within your company, common sense says that the guy should probably be at home. Literally.

You don't use the company dime to give him a trip for ATL for any reason. None. That defies common sense on all levels.

You can bash Fescoe's tweet all you want, but if I'm Clark, and I'm looking to get rid of Pioli as cheaply as possible and I know that Scott's buddy Dimitroff could possibly have an opening - and I'm going to ATL to interview HC candidates - you're goddamn right I put him on the plane.

No one even knows if Pioli was in the interview, they just assume it.

He could just have easily been discussing a position with Dimitroff while Clark and the posse were doing interviews.

But sure, let's all jump off the deep end.

Mother****erJones 01-02-2013 03:55 PM

I was hoping Clark would do to Pioli what Jimmy was doing to Karen in Goodfellas: Keep walking there, keep going lol trying to get her whacked

tooge 01-02-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 9269411)
Maybe his contract stipulates he has to be involved. If so Clark would be in breach of contract if he was not present during interviews.

He's there to carry Clarks bags and open his door. Maybe toss his salad right before bed.

DJ's left nut 01-02-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269345)
Really? So finding three starting offensive lineman is the same as finding three starting defensive lineman? Finding a RB or two late in the draft is the same as finding a #1 and #2 receiver? In which universe do you live?

Arizona can easily fill their offensive line and running back holes in one offseason. Whether it's Kolb or a second rounder or Alex Smith or Joe Flacco, the Cards are poised to reach the playoffs much more quickly than the Chiefs, which have holes everywhere along with a lack of depth.

I think you're overstating problems to fit an agenda here.

3 teams found immediate starting RBs in the draft last season, only 1 of which found that one late in the draft. Yes, finding a late-round RB is quite hard, especially when you also have a shit offensive line.

And how do you figure the Chiefs need to find 3 D-linemen? If they move to a 4-3, they'll need at most 1. If they stay in a 4-3, they'll probably only need 1 (Poe's going to get a shot and frankly he probably deserves it). Jackson will be an adequate stopgap, especially if properly coached.

And yes, it is absolutely difficult to just re-set your O-Line, easily as difficult as D-lineman (it's no easier to find a LT than it is to find a RDE). Sure, you can just draft someone and throw them in there...but there's a better than average chance that they suck.

Moreover, why is the Cardinals QB issue so quickly dismissed while the Chiefs one is not? Why is it easy for the Cards to just go get Alex Smith or Joe Flacco and not easy for KC? We have plenty of cap space and the Bidwells are hardly Dan Snyder. If that's the route that Reid wants to go, it will be no easier for AZ to turn that trick than it would be for KC.

C'mon - you're understating the AZ holes and overstating the KC ones. These are two extremely similar situations and the Chiefs are playing in a weaker division. I don't see any reason to believe one has a clearer shot to the playoffs than the other apart from the 'inflection' you use when discussing respective weaknesses.

TEX 01-02-2013 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MGRS13 (Post 9269384)
We can root all we want to. Pioli is with Clark doing interviews, not looking for a job. If Clark was going to fire him Pioli wouldn't be along for the ride. Not only will Pioli be the GM next year he is getting his say on who the head coach is. We will all have to wait another year to "start over"..... again.

Well I agree that Pioli will be the GM next year. I have held that opinion throughtout this season and especially now thathe's still there. However, I don't feel he's getting much of a say, if any, as to who the next HC will be. In any case - having Pioli around in any capacity is a bad idea.

penguinz 01-02-2013 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tooge (Post 9269417)
He's there to carry Clarks bags and open his door. Maybe toss his salad right before bed.

http://www.gamerevolution.com/images...ie_monster.jpg

BigCatDaddy 01-02-2013 03:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9269377)
Not by fans. That's for sure.

Fans thought it might be Clausen, but we saw how scouts viewed him.

Clausen was in the Bradford draft.

DaneMcCloud 01-02-2013 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 9269408)
I 1000% disagree that the Cardinals can fix their atrocious line in one offseason as well as find a QB in one offseason. They are a mess, much like we are. And I think finding 3-4 des really isn't that difficult of a proposition.

The Cardinals also have to compete with the 49ers and Seattle, 2 teams that will constantly be better than they are for the next 3-4 years without question.

Dude, they could sign Alex Smith to compete with Kolb, take Joeckel at 8 or 9, then grab the best running back in the 2nd round, a guard in the third, a TE in the 4th, another guard in the 5th, another RB in the 6th and sign a starter here or there for their offensive line.

That is MUCH easier than finding a ****ing true Nose Tackle, starters and depth at the 5 tech, a starting safety opposite Berry, a starting ILB next to DJ (who IS aging, BTW), possibly a #1 receiver and definitely a #2 receiver, a reliable TE, etc. AND a franchise QB.

I've watched Arizona on many occasions and I'm actually shocked they fired Whiz. He's put competitive teams on the field with freaking five different QB's. Rod Graves failed Arizona IMO, not Whiz.

And they're closer than you'd think.

TEX 01-02-2013 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dave (Post 9269400)
:facepalm:

I've been telling you Dave, don't shrug off the fact that Pioli is still around as being meaningless. You just might get that link you asked me to provide for you last week before the season ended...

DeezNutz 01-02-2013 03:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigCatDaddy (Post 9269422)
Clausen was in the Bradford draft.

Of course he was. Sorry about that. Selected by the same ****ing team, no less. Dropped the ball completely on that.

bevischief 01-02-2013 03:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269414)
You can bash Fescoe's tweet all you want, but if I'm Clark, and I'm looking to get rid of Pioli as cheaply as possible and I know that Scott's buddy Dimitroff could possibly have an opening - and I'm going to ATL to interview HC candidates - you're goddamn right I put him on the plane.

No one even knows if Pioli was in the interview, they just assume it.

He could just have easily been discussing a position with Dimitroff while Clark and the posse were doing interviews.

But sure, let's all jump off the deep end.

Too late already happened...

DeezNutz 01-02-2013 03:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269414)
You can bash Fescoe's tweet all you want, but if I'm Clark, and I'm looking to get rid of Pioli as cheaply as possible and I know that Scott's buddy Dimitroff could possibly have an opening - and I'm going to ATL to interview HC candidates - you're goddamn right I put him on the plane.

No one even knows if Pioli was in the interview, they just assume it.

He could just have easily been discussing a position with Dimitroff while Clark and the posse were doing interviews.

But sure, let's all jump off the deep end
.

Who is doing this? This is a message board, and we're discussing news. This is exactly what someone tried to pull on htimsqquuae earlier today, and he had to explain that he wasn't worked up at all. Just "talking."

BigCatDaddy 01-02-2013 04:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9269430)
Of course he was. Sorry about that. Selected by the same ****ing team, no less. Dropped the ball completely on that.

You're still right though. I remember telling Dane that Kaepernick would go before Cam right before he told me to go **** my mother.

Marcellus 01-02-2013 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269427)
Dude, they could sign Alex Smith to compete with Kolb, take Joeckel at 8 or 9, then grab the best running back in the 2nd round, a guard in the third, a TE in the 4th, another guard in the 5th, another RB in the 6th and sign a starter here or there for their offensive line.

That is MUCH easier than finding a ****ing true Nose Tackle, starters and depth at the 5 tech, a starting safety opposite Berry, a starting ILB next to DJ (who IS aging, BTW), possibly a #1 receiver and definitely a #2 receiver, a reliable TE, etc. AND a franchise QB.

I've watched Arizona on many occasions and I'm actually shocked they fired Whiz. He's put competitive teams on the field with freaking five different QB's. Rod Graves failed Arizona IMO, not Whiz.

And they're closer than you'd think.

Sounds like you need to head to AZ for an interview. :D

TimeForWasp 01-02-2013 04:01 PM

Will it be cheaper to order our banners ahead of time?
"Fire the Walrus" SaveOurChiefsAgain.com

Fansy the Famous Bard 01-02-2013 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269414)
You can bash Fescoe's tweet all you want, but if I'm Clark, and I'm looking to get rid of Pioli as cheaply as possible and I know that Scott's buddy Dimitroff could possibly have an opening - and I'm going to ATL to interview HC candidates - you're goddamn right I put him on the plane.

No one even knows if Pioli was in the interview, they just assume it.

He could just have easily been discussing a position with Dimitroff while Clark and the posse were doing interviews.

But sure, let's all jump off the deep end.

Scott lining up a job with his Canadian buddy ain't gonna help Clark with the money he's gonna owe.

Messier 01-02-2013 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 9269428)
I've been telling you Dave, don't shrug off the fact that Pioli is still around as being meaningless. You just might get that link you asked me to provide for you last week before the season ended...

Again, why not say Pioli will be back when the question was plainly asked? Hunt is planning for Pioli to be gone. Why he isn't I don't know. But when your answer to, will Pioli be back as GM? is, there are still changes to be made, it doesn't sound good for Pioli.

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2013 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bevischief (Post 9269433)
Too late already happened...

And people say I'm negative...

Holy shit.

I want the guy fired too, but I'm not going to ignore common sense either.

It's easy to say, "hey, Clark - admit you ****ed up and fire the guy, it's just money."

There's not a person here that wouldn't try to limit the financial damages before making a move like this.

Marcellus 01-02-2013 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269444)
And people say I'm negative...

Holy shit.

I want the guy fired too, but I'm not going to ignore common sense either.

It's easy to say, "hey, Clark - admit you ****ed up and fire the guy, it's just money."

There's not a person here that wouldn't try to limit the financial damages before making a move like this.

If I understand correctly because of the buy out clause it cost $5MM to keep him and $7.5MM to fire him?

If I heard that right, and thats the case, I would let him sit in the corner sucking his thumb before I pay him an extra $2.5MM to fire him and let him go get another job.

DJ's left nut 01-02-2013 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269427)
Dude, they could sign Alex Smith to compete with Kolb, take Joeckel at 8 or 9, then grab the best running back in the 2nd round, a guard in the third, a TE in the 4th, another guard in the 5th, another RB in the 6th and sign a starter here or there for their offensive line.

That is MUCH easier than finding a ****ing true Nose Tackle, starters and depth at the 5 tech, a starting safety opposite Berry, a starting ILB next to DJ (who IS aging, BTW), possibly a #1 receiver and definitely a #2 receiver, a reliable TE, etc. AND a franchise QB.

I've watched Arizona on many occasions and I'm actually shocked they fired Whiz. He's put competitive teams on the field with freaking five different QB's. Rod Graves failed Arizona IMO, not Whiz.

And they're closer than you'd think.

The Chiefs could tag Bowe, re-sign Albert, Sign Alex Smith to compete with Quinn, draft a CB in the 2nd, a SS in the 3rd, an 3-4DE or 4-3 OLB in the 4th, an ILB in the 4th as well with their Carr pick, a TE in the 5th and STILL have their first rounder to use on Geno if that's the route they so chose.

Yes, it is absolutely that easy for this team. When you just say "look - this is what the Cardinals could do" I can easily counter with "Look - this is what the Chiefs could do" and get to the same result.

They're in the exact same damn spot. You're just passing off the Cardinals problems as having easy solutions but in reality, many of the Chiefs problems aren't any different.

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2013 04:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 9269435)
Who is doing this? This is a message board, and we're discussing news. This is exactly what someone tried to pull on htimsqquuae earlier today, and he had to explain that he wasn't worked up at all. Just "talking."

You've been here long enough to know which posters are "just talking" and which posters are shitting their pants.

-King- 01-02-2013 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9269450)
The Chiefs could tag Bowe, re-sign Albert, Sign Alex Smith to compete with Quinn, draft a CB in the 2nd, a SS in the 3rd, an 3-4DE or 4-3 OLB in the 4th, an ILB in the 4th as well with their Carr pick, a TE in the 5th and STILL have their first rounder to use on Geno if that's the route they so chose.

Yes, it is absolutely that easy for this team. When you just say "look - this is what the Cardinals could do" I can easily counter with "Look - this is what the Chiefs could do" and get to the same result.

They're in the exact same damn spot. You're just passing off the Cardinals problems as having easy solutions but in reality, many of the Chiefs problems aren't any different.

:clap:

ToxSocks 01-02-2013 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269427)
Dude, they could sign Alex Smith to compete with Kolb, take Joeckel at 8 or 9, then grab the best running back in the 2nd round, a guard in the third, a TE in the 4th, another guard in the 5th, another RB in the 6th and sign a starter here or there for their offensive line.

That is MUCH easier than finding a ****ing true Nose Tackle, starters and depth at the 5 tech, a starting safety opposite Berry, a starting ILB next to DJ (who IS aging, BTW), possibly a #1 receiver and definitely a #2 receiver, a reliable TE, etc. AND a franchise QB.

I've watched Arizona on many occasions and I'm actually shocked they fired Whiz. He's put competitive teams on the field with freaking five different QB's. Rod Graves failed Arizona IMO, not Whiz.

And they're closer than you'd think.

If the Cards are closer than we think, than the Chiefs are closer than you think. We have a True Nose Tackle, Poe actually did quite well for a rookie, adn only stand to get better. Why are you dismissing that?

Why are you dismissing Kendrick Lewis, who is marginal, but not noting Marginal Cardinals players?

You keep saying the Cards QB situation is easy to fix, but the Chief's isnt? The same options are available to both clubs, except we'll be in a better position come draft time.

You mention how DJ is "aging" but make no mention on how the Cardinals players (Adrian Wilson???) are aging.

LT's are easy to find now?

5th round OL prospects are "Fixes" now?

Dane, this has "grass is always greener" written all over it.

These are two teams in very similar positions.

One is not "clearly" in a better position than the other.

Mother****erJones 01-02-2013 04:06 PM

That would be funny if Clark brought him to atlanta to talk to Dmitroff for an opening

OnTheWarpath15 01-02-2013 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 9269449)
If I understand correctly because of the buy out clause it cost $5MM to keep him and $7.5MM to fire him?

If I heard that right, and thats the case, I would let him sit in the corner sucking his thumb before I pay him an extra $2.5MM to fire him and let him go get another job.

Report today that an extension was signed back in June or July - so we're talking potentially another 2-3 years at anywhere between $5-8M per.

We could be talking about $20M+

bricks 01-02-2013 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Carlota69 (Post 9267272)
I just saw it on his Facebook status...

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 9269308)
The Chiefs have a number of holes that can't be filled in one offseason. Their defense is in major flux and they need help not only on the defensive line but ILB and safety. They have issues at WR, LT, QB and TE and need depth everywhere.

Arizona's defense has played well. There's no question about their scheme. The help they need, outside of QB, can be easily upgraded in the draft. They're much closer to competing.

The 2013 Chiefs are the 2008 Chiefs before the draft. What happens this April will have a huge impact over the next four years. They're teetering on the brink of being irrelevant for four more years if they **** up.

Arizona is not much closer to competing. Both teams are pretty equal as far as talent goes. The difference between the Chiefs and Cardinals was coaching. Plain and simple. Chiefs just happened to have the black version of Rich Kotite coaching them. I'm glad Romeo is gone. He was as disastrous it could get as far as coaching goes.

TLO 01-02-2013 04:06 PM

On ESPN they just said somebody believes there is a 95 percent chance that he will end up in Arizona. I don't know who was reporting it.

Chief Roundup 01-02-2013 04:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9269450)
The Chiefs could tag Bowe, re-sign Albert, Sign Alex Smith to compete with Quinn, draft a CB in the 2nd, a SS in the 3rd, an 3-4DE or 4-3 OLB in the 4th, an ILB in the 4th as well with their Carr pick, a TE in the 5th and STILL have their first rounder to use on Geno if that's the route they so chose.

Yes, it is absolutely that easy for this team. When you just say "look - this is what the Cardinals could do" I can easily counter with "Look - this is what the Chiefs could do" and get to the same result.

They're in the exact same damn spot. You're just passing off the Cardinals problems as having easy solutions but in reality, many of the Chiefs problems aren't any different.

This.

Some people think that Chiefs players suck while every other teams players are good.

Mother****erJones 01-02-2013 04:07 PM

Add the coaching staff to the 20 m

Marcellus 01-02-2013 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 9269459)
Report today that an extension was signed back in June or July - so we're talking potentially another 2-3 years at anywhere between $5-8M per.

We could be talking about $20M+

Mother****er, I hadn't heard that. Clark has to be pissed at himself.

The Bad Guy 01-02-2013 04:07 PM

How are they signing Smith?

He's not going to be traded in division.

I also think Poe is going to be a fine NT.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.