![]() |
Quote:
Sent from my LG-H918 using Tapatalk |
I'm at my maddest at Alex Smith when he doesn't take chances. It was a bad game for him. But he's not usually that wildly inaccurate. On most games, those are completions. I'd rather that than chances he doesn't take. Alex deserves a lot of blame for losing this but I'm generally not worried about this type of Alex Smith being a regular thing. He made a few errant throws, but putting us in any position at all to win the game at all was superhuman given what we had.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
It's literally the only thing they do really well, and the Chiefs have won a ton of games because of it. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You're actually making an argument for Alex Smith right now. He is the QB version of "bend-but-don't-break". And it is not sustainable: "The same is true for defenses, which appear to be even more random from year to year than offenses -- correlations across the board are lower. Just 30.8 percent of a team's points allowed rank can be explained by its rank in points allowed per red zone trip. And 7.4 percent of a team's points allowed rank is explained by its rank last year. The red zone year-on-year comparison accounts for just 2.4 percent of performance. It's almost entirely random." http://cdn.espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/p...ns-2016-season |
Quote:
This is the most rational and logical approach. Did anyone expect the Chiefs to go undefeated? For as poorly as the Chiefs and Alex in particular played they managed to lose by 6 and that's with Andy Reid making the goofiest call I've ever seen at the nfl level. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
That being said, ALEX HAS TO HIT Robinson. Inexcusable to throw that ball out of bounds. Anywhere In bounds and that's a td.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Quote:
It's pretty interesting to see the defense get pigeonholed for losses when they are by the simplest definition performing at an above-average level. |
Here's more:
The poster boy for all of this would be the Legion of Boom in Seattle. The Seahawks have retained many of their stars on defense, but their red zone performance has oscillated wildly. In 2013, the Seahawks allowed the league's fewest points per possession and kept up their historic dominance inside the 20, allowing the fewest points per red zone trip. In 2014, they were second in points allowed per possession ... but fell all the way to 30th in points allowed per red zone trip, maintaining their high ranking in overall performance by keeping teams from reaching the red zone. And then last year, the Seahawks were consistent as can be, finishing fourth in both points allowed per possession and points allowed per red zone trip. |
Quote:
|
it's one game dawgs, chill yer berries, didn't expect to go undefeated this season anyway
Steelers were always a bad matchup |
Quote:
|
Quote:
mahomes 2018 |
Quote:
the chiefs offense not getting a first down in the 1st half was not a factor in the TOP? WE STOPPED THEM FROM SCORING. How in gods name do you assign the TOP blame to the defense when the offense doesnt make a 1st down? The TOP is on the offense....the offense could not do shit with the ball..... the defense didnt work? come on we held them scorless most of the second half...the defense did what was asked of them. The defense did enough for us to win that game. period. full stop. the bend not break worked...they punched themselves out....we had the chance to KO them be honest dude pitt offense scored 17 points...thats acceptable.... the net 11 points the chiefs offense scored...NOT |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.