ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs release WR Jeremy Maclin (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=308075)

RunKC 06-07-2017 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906153)
I didn't cherry pick anything.

The question was whether Alex Smith limits receivers.

Judging by the fact that Tyreek Hill only had 7 receptions that traveled longer than 10 air yards last year, the answer is yes, not to mention that almost half of his receptions came behind the line of scrimmage last year.

We will not see Reek reach his full potential until Mahomes is the QB.

And?

He's still going to push for 1,000 yards and 8 TD's this season unless he gets hurt.

The Franchise 06-07-2017 12:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KranzDictum (Post 12906176)
You mean on only 61 catches, he was targeted 83 times but only caught 63 of those. A lot of that is on alex for being inaccurate downfield though.

So if he gets 40 more targets he should be close to 900 yards and 90 catches but he doesn't have another downfield threat to protect him so he will get the respect that Macklin used to get.

It is going to be hard for him to have a 1300 yard season without a 2nd option at WR to take some of the heat off him, will also be hard if alex won't throw it deep and allow him to use his speed to run by guys downfield. Teams can put a LB and Safety on fake gronk and then still double Hill until someone else proves they are worth covering.

The real question is what will the base formation be? 12? 13? Reid had 3 and sometimes even 4 TE's out there at times last year, I bet that continues until they can find a QB who is willing and accurate enough to throw downfield.

Fake Gronk? He tore up your #1 defense pretty ****ing good.

RealSNR 06-07-2017 12:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Danguardace (Post 12906152)
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="https://www.youtube.com/embed/gS0vB_6p3So" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

"Somebody who's trying to take care of his family."

Okay, so we should enjoy what we have of Demarcus Robinson right now, because he's going to make somebody pay out the ass for him when he's done with his rookie deal. And that's whether he's good or shitty. Doesn't matter.

BlackOp 06-07-2017 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12906056)
Hard to imagine DAT sticking. Robinson is lauded for his run after catch ability, and Chesson has some return experience as well. I expect one of those two to take over duties.

I have a feeling the Donks would pick-up DAT if KC releases him...their return game was putrid.

ThaVirus 06-07-2017 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12906078)
Wow Hill is gonna be a very good WR.



http://www.arrowheadpride.com/platfo...-gadget-player



Dude is killing elite CB's with separation.


Good Lord, just lob it up to him on a fly and he'll beat the defense to it nine times out of ten.

KranzDictum 06-07-2017 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BlackOp (Post 12906190)
I have a feeling the Donks would pick-up DAT if KC releases him...their return game was putrid.

They drafted 2 guys to take on the 3rd and 4th WR spots as well as help with returns.

DAT isn't a true anything, just like mccluster before him. He has a chance to stick one more year unless kc signs a vet WR.

KranzDictum 06-07-2017 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 12906213)
Good Lord, just lob it up to him on a fly and he'll beat the defense to it nine times out of ten.

You need a QB who can at least place the ball downfield to give him a chance to run under it.

That is why they moved up to draft a guy in the top 10

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 01:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 12906179)
And?

He's still going to push for 1,000 yards and 8 TD's this season unless he gets hurt.

We will see.

thabear04 06-07-2017 01:23 PM

No deal with the Bills on his way to visit the Ravens.

notorious 06-07-2017 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12906052)
Nah

I hope you are right.

ct 06-07-2017 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12905912)
I like Hill....but you know that's not how it works. Hill, as our #1, is going to start getting safeties rotated over the top and he's going to see a bunch of #1 CBs. His stats WILL go up because of the number of targets he's going to get....but it's not like you can just automatically just double his stats. Especially with Smith as QB.

and because of that, i'm gonna make sure i get kelce @TE on my fantasy team. man is gonna FEAST this year!

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 01:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by notorious (Post 12906289)
I hope you are right.

The Chiefs had several issues on offense last year:

1. Lack of a true #1 WR
2. Loss of starting left guard
3. Wearing down of Spencer Ware
4. Injuries to Charcandrick West
5. Ankle injury to Mitchell Schwartz (which he played through)
6. Kelce's immaturity
7. Demetrius Harris and his hands of stone
8. No viable TE behind Kelce

The forum is completely out of touch with how the NFL views Alex Smith that it's laughable. Everything is his fault, regardless of whether or not he leads the offense to 44 points in a playoff road loss or he leads the offense to only 16 points in a home playoff loss.

There's no doubt that he had a bad year in 2016, but to pretend like he's the only one is ludicrous. Schwartz, the "savior" at right tackle struggled mightily for most of the season. Parker Ehinger, who was clearly better than Zach Fulton, was lost in Game 5.

Demetrious Harris continually dropped perfectly placed passes, many of which would have been big gainers. DAT disappeared. Maclin was nothing short of awful. Spencer Ware disappeared against the Texans and was a non-factor by December. Charcandrick West was hobbled in training camp and never displayed the speed and vision that made him the Chiefs leading rusher in 2015.

Reid and Dorsey drafted a RB in the 3rd round that will likely be the starter by mid-season and elevated two second year wide receivers to starters, while cutting their most experienced wide receiver on the roster. They extended their starting right guard and brought in a talented TE that's seen few snaps during his NFL career.

The bottom line is that all of these moves, if successful, will aid the QB and if Hill becomes a true #1 and they get production from their running game and second tight end, the running lanes will once again be available for Alex Smith, which is a necessary part of his game.

I think it's more likely than not that Smith returns to his 2015 level of play. If that happens, and the Chiefs can avoid injuries to their best pass rushers, this team will compete for the AFC crown.

If not, they move on to Mahomes next year and STILL have a very young and talented team. But considering the NFL gave the Chiefs a record six Prime Time games, the general feeling is that the Chiefs under Smith will be very, very good this season.

Keep in mind, even with the loss of Houston, Bailey, Howard, Ehinger, March and DJ, this team lost two games by 2 points that had they won, would have put them at 14-2, the best record in the league.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 01:55 PM

Quote:

Reid and Dorsey took a gamble this offseason in drafting a RB in the 3rd round that will likely be the starter by mid-season
LMAO

I bet he doesn't have 200 yards rushing this year.

What a ludicrous statement.

The Franchise 06-07-2017 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906356)
LMAO

I bet he doesn't have 200 yards rushing this year.

What a ludicrous statement.

ROFL. I'll take that bet.

ct 06-07-2017 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12906040)
Probably the same way it affected Desean Jackson. He'll be used in special teams on a limited basis. He'll be a part time special team's returner and someone else will get the brunt of the work.

they didnt' pull back jackson's return opportunities til a bit later in his career. when he was still "young, dumb and full of " as it goes, they still used him up. I expect KC will do the same, at least this year.

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 01:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906356)
LMAO

I bet he doesn't have 200 yards rushing this year.

What a ludicrous statement.

Actually, I phrased that wrong and corrected.

And FWIW, you're a ****ing moron.

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 01:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12906358)
ROFL. I'll take that bet.

Why?

The little mother****ing piece of shit will just reneg, like he always renegs.

Low class, dishonorable, LOSER.

The Franchise 06-07-2017 01:57 PM

Bet me Clay. Hunt has more than 200 rushing yards next season. What do you want?

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 01:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906356)
LMAO

I bet he doesn't have 200 yards rushing this year.

What a ludicrous statement.

You know what's ludicrous?

The suggestion of cutting Tyreek Hill and claiming he'd have no impact.

That wasn't you trolling, that was you not understanding the game of football, despite 200,000 posts.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12906363)
Why?

The little mother****ing piece of shit will just reneg, like he always renegs.

Wrong. I'm currently honoring a bet.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12906361)
Actually, I phrased that wrong and corrected.

And FWIW, you're a ****ing moron.

There's absolutely no way Hunt is our starting running back at any point this year barring massive injuries.

ToxSocks 06-07-2017 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906394)
There's absolutely no way Hunt is our starting running back at any point this year barring massive injuries.

He doesn't have to be the starter to break 200.

RunKC 06-07-2017 02:13 PM

Clay is wrong about 99% of Chiefs related content. Tyreek Hill, Sean Smith, Pat Mahomes. Clay has been predicting that the Chiefs are an 8-8 at best team for 5 years and every year it's the same egg that sits on his face with a plate of crow that sits in front of him.

It's confirmed. Kareem Hunt and Pat Mahomes will now be awesome bc Clay hated them.

The Franchise 06-07-2017 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906388)
Wrong. I'm currently honoring a bet.

Then bet me.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 02:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12906403)
He doesn't have to be the starter to break 200.

Ware/West will be 1-2 on the depth chart.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 02:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12906409)
Then bet me.

$50?

The Franchise 06-07-2017 02:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906412)
$50?

Kareem Hunt goes over 200 yards rushing?

$50 for you if he doesn't.

$50 for me if he does.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12906422)
Kareem Hunt goes over 200 yards rushing?

$50 for you if he doesn't.

$50 for me if he does.

Works for me, bud.

Baby Lee 06-07-2017 02:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12906352)
The Chiefs had several issues on offense last year:

1. Lack of a true #1 WR
2. Loss of starting left guard
3. Wearing down of Spencer Ware
4. Injuries to Charcandrick West
5. Ankle injury to Mitchell Schwartz (which he played through)
6. Kelce's immaturity
7. Demetrius Harris and his hands of stone
8. No viable TE behind Kelce

The forum is completely out of touch with how the NFL views Alex Smith that it's laughable. Everything is his fault, regardless of whether or not he leads the offense to 44 points in a playoff road loss or he leads the offense to only 16 points in a home playoff loss.

There's no doubt that he had a bad year in 2016, but to pretend like he's the only one is ludicrous. Schwartz, the "savior" at right tackle struggled mightily for most of the season. Parker Ehinger, who was clearly better than Zach Fulton, was lost in Game 5.

Demetrious Harris continually dropped perfectly placed passes, many of which would have been big gainers. DAT disappeared. Maclin was nothing short of awful. Spencer Ware disappeared against the Texans and was a non-factor by December. Charcandrick West was hobbled in training camp and never displayed the speed and vision that made him the Chiefs leading rusher in 2015.

Reid and Dorsey drafted a RB in the 3rd round that will likely be the starter by mid-season and elevated two second year wide receivers to starters, while cutting their most experienced wide receiver on the roster. They extended their starting right guard and brought in a talented TE that's seen few snaps during his NFL career.

The bottom line is that all of these moves, if successful, will aid the QB and if Hill becomes a true #1 and they get production from their running game and second tight end, the running lanes will once again be available for Alex Smith, which is a necessary part of his game.

I think it's more likely than not that Smith returns to his 2015 level of play. If that happens, and the Chiefs can avoid injuries to their best pass rushers, this team will compete for the AFC crown.

If not, they move on to Mahomes next year and STILL have a very young and talented team. But considering the NFL gave the Chiefs a record six Prime Time games, the general feeling is that the Chiefs under Smith will be very, very good this season.

Keep in mind, even with the loss of Houston, Bailey, Howard, Ehinger, March and DJ, this team lost two games by 2 points that had they won, would have put them at 14-2, the best record in the league.

I usually summarize with 'it's a team game.' But if anyone has any confusion over what I mean by that, . . . this.

DJ's left nut 06-07-2017 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12906358)
ROFL. I'll take that bet.

Given his history, it's a bet worth taking just because Clay made it.

Yeah, Hunt will get 200. Hell, West had almost 300 last year and he was injured and/or shite for most of the season.

I'm not convinced Hunt will end up the #1, but he'll damn sure end up the #2. West isn't going to be able to fight him off.

ct 06-07-2017 02:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 12906213)
Good Lord, just lob it up to him on a fly and he'll beat the defense to it nine times out of ten.

who does that sound like? yup.

ct 06-07-2017 02:50 PM

SERIOUSLY PEOPLE, QUIT QUOTING THE ****ING TROLLS!!

some of us have them on ignore for a reason, they should be ignored

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12906469)
Given his history, it's a bet worth taking just because Clay made it.

Yeah, Hunt will get 200. Hell, West had almost 300 last year and he was injured and/or shite for most of the season.

I'm not convinced Hunt will end up the #1, but he'll damn sure end up the #2. West isn't going to be able to fight him off.

Unless Ware is injured in TC or early, I expect him to start, with Hunt gradually upping his touches until mid-season, when he likely takes over as the starter.

Having Ware healthy in December and January would go a long way in the Chiefs success.

The Franchise 06-07-2017 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906439)
Works for me, bud.

Deal. I'll send you rep for it so it's marked.

That $50 will be going towards a new Mahomes jersey....so it won't be a total loss for you.

Easy 6 06-07-2017 03:04 PM

Chiefs release Maclin
 
Wow, pretty shocking stuff, I can only assume Reid and co are looking to the future with this move... not to mention he looked like ass last year

I would be even more shocked if he didnt end up back in Philly, they're anything but loaded at WR and he could step right in with Jeffrey to give them a decent starting duo

The Franchise 06-07-2017 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12906495)
Wow, pretty shocking stuff, I can only assume Reid and co are looking to the future with this move... not to mention he looked like ass last year

I would be even more shocked if he didnt end up back in Philly, they're anything but loaded at WR and he could step right in with Jeffrey to give them a decent starting duo

I know they're just names....but they have a TON of WRs at this point. I don't see it.

He'll choose between either Buffalo or Baltimore.

Easy 6 06-07-2017 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12906500)
I know they're just names....but they have a TON of WRs at this point. I don't see it.

He'll choose between either Buffalo or Baltimore.

IIRC they drafted two guys and signed Jeffrey, seems pretty thin considering Agholor (sp?) looks bad... seems like Pederson could maybe use a vet who knows the system

But who knows, definitely been seeing a lotta talk about Buffalo around the webs

The Franchise 06-07-2017 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12906507)
IIRC they drafted two guys and signed Jeffrey, seems pretty thin considering Agholor (sp?) looks bad... seems like Pederson could maybe use a vet who knows the system

But who knows, definitely been seeing a lotta talk about Buffalo around the webs

They have Torrey Smith as well.

ToxSocks 06-07-2017 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906411)
Ware/West will be 1-2 on the depth chart.

I see. So you just like being wrong on purpose.

Easy 6 06-07-2017 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pestilence (Post 12906510)
They have Torrey Smith as well.

Ah yep, forgot about him... too bad for Maclin, Philly would've been a great fit for him

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12906527)
I see. So you just like being wrong on purpose.

Charcandrick West was a huge part of this team's best season in 2015.

I see a huge hypocritical double standard where people are insisting Alex Smith can "return to form" but a far younger player can't.

And to suggest Hunt could leapfrog TWO spots...well, that's just true lunacy.

It's not like Ware and West are old or even close to it. They're both 25. Unless Kareem Hunt lights the world on fire in preseason, or there's a big injury, he'll start the year 3rd on the depth chart.

Hunt wasn't picked to be this team's starter this season...he was a depth pick.

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 03:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906551)
Hunt wasn't picked to be this team's starter this season...he was a depth pick.

Wrong, as usual

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12906558)
Wrong, as usual

http://www.espn.com/blog/kansas-city...or-kareem-hunt

Quote:

None of this means Hunt will play, or play a lot, this season. For now, as he’s learning his assignments, Hunt is third into the lineup at practice behind Ware and Charcandrick West.

He has much to prove before he’ll be given playing time, mainly that he can be effective as a runner in the NFL and that he can adequately handle pass protection.
Oh, then there's CJ Spiller...it's going to be a dogfight at RB.

staylor26 06-07-2017 03:42 PM

Wtf is so ludicrous about saying Hunt will be the starter by mid season?

Even non-Chiefs fans in the fantasy world are predicting this.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12906569)
Wtf is so ludicrous about saying Hunt will be the starter by mid season?

A third round rookie who runs a 4.65 beating out a guy who was top 10 in the NFL in yards after contact last year seems like fantasy.

staylor26 06-07-2017 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906577)
A third round rookie who runs a 4.65 beating out a guy who was top 10 in the NFL in yards after contact last year seems like fantasy.

Funny because I remember you saying Hunt's 40 time wasn't an issue before.

You realize Ware is no faster, if not slower, correct? He's also proven he can handle a full time workload unlike Ware who never even did it in colllege and clearly struggled with it last year.

Hunt was one of the best RB's in college football at yards after contact too.

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906560)
http://www.espn.com/blog/kansas-city...or-kareem-hunt



Oh, then there's CJ Spiller...it's going to be a dogfight at RB.

CJ Spiller?

LMAO

“You could see that where we were positioned at that particular round, we had to go up or else we would have not have gotten that running back, so we decided to go up,” said Dorsey in a press conference to explain the Chiefs picks on day two. “I was sitting there and I said, ‘We have to go up and get this running back. Otherwise, we’re gonna miss out. Take out the top tier running backs, this was the next best guy.”

Dorsey traded the Chiefs’ third round pick (No. 104 overall), their fourth-round pick (No. 132) and their seventh-round pick (No. 245) to move up 18 spots in the third round with the Vikings.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 12906582)
Funny bc I remember you saying Hunt's 40 time wasn't an issue before.

It's not an issue. I still think he could be a good player.

I just think it's ludicrous to pencil him in as the starter. This isn't a Jamaal Charles pick we're dealing with. He's not an elite physical talent.

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906577)
A third round rookie who runs a 4.65 beating out a guy who was top 10 in the NFL in yards after contact last year seems like fantasy.

Idiot. Troll.

John Dorsey didn't trade 3 draft picks for a "depth" player.

Good ****ing god.

staylor26 06-07-2017 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12906588)
It's not an issue. I still think he could be a good player.

I just think it's ludicrous to pencil him in as the starter. This isn't a Jamaal Charles pick we're dealing with. He's not an elite physical talent.

Check my edit. You're wrong.

You realize Ware is no faster, if not slower, correct? He's also proven he can handle a full time workload unlike Ware who never even did it in colllege and clearly struggled with it last year.

Hunt was one of the best RB's in college football at yards after contact too.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 03:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12906589)
Idiot. Troll.

Agree to disagree.

Have a nice, Dane McCloud9.

Easy 6 06-07-2017 03:55 PM

1) Kareem Hunt was praised up and down by pro scouts

2) Way too much is being made of his 40 time

3) He will be starting by midseason

Kiimo 06-07-2017 04:03 PM

Wait wait wait the Kareem Hunt will be third on the depth chart and won't get 200 yards this year post wasn't a joke?

That's like...a serious prediction?

That's like betting it won't rain five times this year. That's the easiest 50 bucks you're ever going to earn.

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 04:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Kiimosabi (Post 12906614)
Wait wait wait the Kareem Hunt will be third on the depth chart and won't get 200 yards this year post wasn't a joke?

That's like...a serious prediction?

That's like betting it won't rain five times this year. That's the easiest 50 bucks you're ever going to earn.

It's called Trolling

O.city 06-07-2017 05:03 PM

Hunt will end up a good 1 2 punch with ware

ToxSocks 06-07-2017 05:11 PM

If Spiller looks anywhere as good as he and Dorsey say he does, then Spiller makes the roster over West.

Ware/Hunt/Spiller.

Spiller becomes your new Jet Sweep guy now that Reek is at the Z.

ToxSocks 06-07-2017 05:11 PM

Hell, maybe they keep West and dump DAT.

O.city 06-07-2017 05:19 PM

Yeah I'm doubtful on spiller but if he's got whatever back, he'd be a nice addition

TigeRRUppeRRcut 06-07-2017 05:29 PM

Frank Gore ran a 4.6 and so did Hunt.

Clay has ZERO understanding about football.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-07-2017 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12906676)
Hell, maybe they keep West and dump DAT.

Regardless of who they keep, that part right there is a WONDERFUL idea.

DJ's left nut 06-07-2017 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12906706)
Frank Gore ran a 4.6 and so did Hunt.

Clay has ZERO understanding about football.

Gore ran a 4.55 and he did so on a re-built knee that he never truly fully recovered from. Gore was effective, yes, but he was never the same explosive player he was before his knee sploded. Gore has never been a fast back despite timing nearly a full 10th faster than Hunt did (nice rounding trick there, ass).

Don't try to argue that Hunt isn't slow - by NFL runningback standards, he is. And that was after cutting weight. He's unlikely to be any faster than that 4.62 and could, in fact, end up a bit worse.

If you want to try to argue that he can be a good runningback despite not being terribly explosive, I'll listen. But don't try to argue that the guy is fast because by NFL standards, he just isn't.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 05:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerUppercut (Post 12906706)
Frank Gore ran a 4.6 and so did Hunt.

Clay has ZERO understanding about football.

:facepalm:

Nowhere have I said that Hunt can't be a good RB in the NFL.

I just have serious doubts that a player with his particular physical skillset is going to come in and claim a starting job on a playoff team his rookie year.

You guys can't handle a little nuance apparently.

Kiimo 06-07-2017 05:45 PM

Hunt was aiming for a 40 in the 4.4-4.5 range and expected to get there. I think he just ran a bad time and being 8 pounds overweight probably didn't help.

He's going to get a ton of usage.

KChiefs1 06-07-2017 06:37 PM

The British POV:
https://youtu.be/wkmmAaiybJs




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-07-2017 06:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KChiefs1 (Post 12906854)
The British POV:
https://youtu.be/wkmmAaiybJs




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

What a nice lad! Thanks for sharing.

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Detoxing (Post 12906674)
If Spiller looks anywhere as good as he and Dorsey say he does, then Spiller makes the roster over West.

Ware/Hunt/Spiller.

Spiller becomes your new Jet Sweep guy now that Reek is at the Z.

I'd say there's a 1% chance Spiller makes the squad.

Sweet Daddy Hate 06-07-2017 07:01 PM

Did we release De Useless yet?

staylor26 06-07-2017 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12906729)
Gore ran a 4.55 and he did so on a re-built knee that he never truly fully recovered from. Gore was effective, yes, but he was never the same explosive player he was before his knee sploded. Gore has never been a fast back despite timing nearly a full 10th faster than Hunt did (nice rounding trick there, ass).

Don't try to argue that Hunt isn't slow - by NFL runningback standards, he is. And that was after cutting weight. He's unlikely to be any faster than that 4.62 and could, in fact, end up a bit worse.

If you want to try to argue that he can be a good runningback despite not being terribly explosive, I'll listen. But don't try to argue that the guy is fast because by NFL standards, he just isn't.

I actually compared Hunt to Gore (after the injuries), but I don't think people realize how good Gore was before them.

That guy was better than McGahee and Portis. He used to come in and rack up 100 yards in the 4th like it was nothing as a freshman.

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 12906891)
Did we release De Useless yet?

Why? He's Ty Hill's backup.

He's on a rookie deal so he's cheap.

I don't get the hate.

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 07:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12906729)
But don't try to argue that the guy is fast because by NFL standards, he just isn't.

He's certainly not JC or CJ2k fast. Not even close.

But he was soft hands, has very good vision and didn't miss a beat at the Senior Bowl. Priest Holmes wasn't the fastest guy in the league, especially after two torn ACL's, but his vision and hands were extraordinary.

He's far more talented than Ware or West and I expect him to be a big contributor in 2017.

milkman 06-07-2017 07:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 12905853)
Well shit, if you want to dig that deep it's Pioli's fault for leaving exactly zero roster depth.

Dorsey's approach isn't exactly secret; horizontal roster building. He wants depth stacked deep across the roster (as opposed to Pioli's stars and scrubs rosters). So he's been using a ton of draft capital to build that depth.

The problem is that when the depth wasn't already there, if you miss on someone (and you will), it creates a hole that you can't backfill as easily as you'd like.

As for the Carr issue - really, if Dorsey didn't take Carr because he had Smith already, that's on Dorsey. Smith's extension was after the '14 draft - the Chiefs weren't married to Smith yet and Dorsey's the final say. Reid's position was wholly reasonable coming into the 2013 season - he's a guy that just got ****ing fired and is taking over a team that experienced a fan mutiny mere months ago. He couldn't go into the 2013 season with no friggen quarterback. So the Smith move had to be made - it just did. And bark and complain all you want, but 2 second rounders for a guy that's given you credible quarterback play for 5 years is actually a pittance. That trade worked out well.

Dorsey can't hide behind Reid here - if he wanted Carr, he should've taken Carr. At that point you don't extend Smith in August of '14 and his iffy '14 season is probably enough to spark the QB move.

You can't blame Reid for Dorsey passing on Carr. Dorsey had a similar roadmap in front of him to what he has now and he paid much more dearly to bring in Mahomes. Dorsey just didn't have the juevos to make the move at the time.

I don't believe it had anything to do with juevos.

I think it had to do with trust.

Andy Reid believed he could get more out of Alex than he actually could.
Dorsey trusted that he would.

Easy 6 06-07-2017 07:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12906923)
Andy Reid believed he could get more out of Alex than he actually could.
Dorsey trusted that he would.

These two sentences could sum up sooo many arguments that go on around here

Its no ones fault, its everyones fault, hate to say it but it is what it is, no regime is perfect... they both knew we could win with Smith, but maybe Reid believed he could win more with him, that he could coax a new pinnacle out of Smith

DaneMcCloud 06-07-2017 07:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12906923)
Andy Reid believed he could get more out of Alex than he actually could.
Dorsey trusted that he would.

Oh, just **** off. This team was a laughing stock when Dorsey and Reid were hired.

Since then, this team has won double digit games and has SIX Prime Time games scheduled this year.

You, like most of CP, doesn't get it.

This is CLARK HUNT'S plan and it's FINALLY being realized.

He made a major misstep with Pioli and has rectified it.

saphojunkie 06-07-2017 07:46 PM

It's also entirely possible that Dorsey liked Derek Carr and wanted to draft him, but Reid didn't like that he shits himself versus the rush.

Mahomes under pressure is a miracle to behold.

If I'm not mistaken - the numbers last year were night and day when Carr was pressured.

milkman 06-07-2017 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12906960)
Oh, just **** off. This team was a laughing stock when Dorsey and Reid were hired.

Since then, this team has won double digit games and has SIX Prime Time games scheduled this year.

You, like most of CP, doesn't get it.

This is CLARK HUNT'S plan and it's FINALLY being realized.

He made a major misstep with Pioli and has rectified it.

What the **** is your ****ing problem?

I didn't say anything negative or derogatory here.

I simply made an observation of the kind of relationship that exists between Dorsey and Reid.

KranzDictum 06-07-2017 07:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 12906960)
Oh, just **** off. This team was a laughing stock when Dorsey and Reid were hired.

Since then, this team has won double digit games and has SIX Prime Time games scheduled this year.

You, like most of CP, doesn't get it.

This is CLARK HUNT'S plan and it's FINALLY being realized.

He made a major misstep with Pioli and has rectified it.

Oh the heights of success! Dare to Dream!

If you think of it though a slight decline from the heady days when Reid made the NFC Championship game 4 years in a row.

threebag 06-07-2017 08:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12902774)
Longer than you, kid.

Mahomes has a better chance at being a HOF QB than you being anything more than a piece of shit.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 09:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 12907022)
Mahomes has a better chance at being a HOF QB than you being anything more than a piece of shit.

In that case go ahead and put him in the HOF now, because I'm pretty damn successful.

Hammock Parties 06-07-2017 09:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 12906971)
What the **** is your ****ing problem?

He's Dane.

If you disagree with him, he acts like a total dick.

Are you new here?

Halfcan 06-07-2017 09:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 12907164)
He's Dane.

If you disagree with him, he acts like a total dick.

Are you new here?

ROFL


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:44 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.