|
Fisher was the LT for one of the best pass-blocking teams in the game this year. And our struggles in the run game had little do to with the stretch plays, etc... that he would've been heavily involved in.
Fisher was a big time asset this season and will continue to be for the foreseeable future. He was the clear best choice for 1.1 and the extension he got will be a bargain for every season he plays under it. Fisher is making lemons into lemonade. Shit draft year, but Dorsey did a damn fine job with the cards he was dealt. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
NFL officials are ass-hats, and the first to be offended when the use of technology is suggested to help "fill in the gaps" they choose to not be looking at. I hope Karma has them all catch AIDS! Oh, "the game would be too long." Yeah, lord knows more commercial breaks is the last thing those money-grubbing whores want a chance at. |
Quote:
Eh....I think we just saw his last great year because he didn't have to go a full season and he pretty much spent all of 2015 on the bench. That gave that knee plenty of time to rest and firm up. But if you're signing him to a sizeable deal, you're rolling with him as the starter and I think you're going to get seriously diminishing returns. I'd rather see another mid-rounder (4thish) allocated to OG. Fulton has plateaued (at best) and it's probably time to upgrade there if at all possible. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Which is probably his death knell with Reid. |
Can somebody explain to me the benefit of keeping Foles and cutting Smith?
I understand bringing in a highly drafted rookie to redshirt, but why Foles? He's as much a known commodity as Smith is, and simply isn't as good. |
Also, it perfectly encapsulates the impotent rage of ChiefsPlanet that their most popular ideas of how to improve at QB is to "get rid of Smith," followed by "I have no idea."
|
Quote:
Even if he's as good as Smith, Foles has a $10 million dollar clause in his contract that pretty much forces the Chiefs to renegotiate his deal. Foles won't be cheap next year unless the FA market forces him to be cheap. Mostly it's just the nuts who think Smith is terrible and want anyone but him. |
Quote:
Smith has started 136. He's not even in the same stratosphere as far as "known commodities" go. And to be honest, his first 36 games shit all over Smith's first 36 games. You want to see what you truly have in Foles and save a bunch of money at the QB position before drafting a kid in 2018? Go with Foles. **** it. You have nothing to lose. This team doesn't have a shot at the SB next season, and Foles looked fine in relief duty last year. He had the highest QB rating, highest YPA, highest TD%, lowest INT% on the team. |
Also, **** Brad Kaaya. I don't want anything to do with that asshole
|
Quote:
|
After his first 36 starts, Alex Smith had a 32-38 TD-INT ratio and a 69 QB rating and a 13-23 record.
He improved to "second only to Tom Brady and Aaron Rodgers" 100 starts later. But Nick Foles, who is standing at 56-27/88.1/20-16 in the same categories...can't improve. Just admit you have an unhealthy obsession with game managers. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
| All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:40 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
