Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 16208483)

Exactly. Hill is irreplaceable and you keep the trio going. Just ****ing absolutely mind blowing dumb.

Originally Posted by comochiefsfan (Post 16208432)

John Dorsey would've NEVER allowed it to get to this point.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16208493)

The Chiefs weren’t getting multiple first round picks for Hill. Not with him wanting a deal to make him the highest paid WR.

And we weren’t trading with the Jets if Hill didn’t want to go there.

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16208484)

More upset? I don't know.

The package of picks they got back is awful. Don't like it at all.

But Hill's contract with the Dolphins is RIDICULOUS. And then you add the fact that the Chiefs nurtured him like you mention and well, yeah, I don't like his side of it either.

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16208439)

I don’t think the Jets offer was going to happen. I’m fine with the trade. Just use those picks and the newly gained cap space to build a defense.

Originally Posted by ShowtimeSBMVP (Post 16208472)

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">More Tyreek Hill contract details: The $72.2 million becomes fully guaranteed at the start of the 2023 league year. The other $52.535 million is fully guaranteed at signing.</p>&mdash; Adam Schefter (@AdamSchefter) <a href="https://twitter.com/AdamSchefter/status/1506676546311962631?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 23, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>


Wow

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 16208487)

can someone create our draft picks/order in its entirety (as it stands RN?)

Originally Posted by New World Order (Post 16208468)

Well, our gm better start drafting some weapons because Hill is gone and Kelce will be 33 this year

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16208489)

It's the 4ths that bug me.

29 and 50 isn't a bad start, but for YEARS this board has justified bad decisions with these late 1st round picks as 'its virtually a 2nd anyway' and now we're supposed to pretend like it has the value that the Raiders pick had that they shipped to GB?

If 29 is the 'top' asset, there needs to be more ancillary pieces to justify it. And friggen 4th round picks ain't that.

You use 4th rounders to move up 6 spots in the 2nd. You don't use them to put a deal over the top for a HoF ****ing pass catcher.

That needed to be, at WORST, a 2 next year and honestly I'd have given up a 3 or something this season to see that be one of their 1sts next year.

It's just bad return. You can't get less than the Packers got for Adams and somehow we did.

Veach blinked. Wouldn't be the first time.

Originally Posted by stevegroganfan (Post 16208458)

Congratulations for a move the Patriots under Belichick would have made 10 out of 10 times. Great medium to long term deal for the Chiefs if KC just does a decent job with the additional cap space and plethora of picks. It values Hill more than Adams and when you factor in Hill's punt returning ability, he should be valued a little more. Hill will probably age better than Adams since he takes less big hits and he is already one year younger but one injury to Hill could obviously change everything.

Dolphins made much more sense for Hill than the Jets. He will be the big star even over their QB which most people think of as someone more like an average QB. Lower taxes than NY. Warm weather perhaps more important as he ages. Arguably better night life than even NY. Great place to live if you are rich.

Long term this trade helps the Bills/Patriots/Jets since Dolphins lost so much cheap draft capital but it does make the Dolphins better in the short term.