ChiefsPlanet
Page 13 of 14 « First 39101112 13 14
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football WR Wes Welker has been suspended four games for use of amphetamines (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=286164)

vailpass 09-10-2014 05:14 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 10900705)
This is stupid. They should encourage the use not prevent it.
Yep.

listopencil 09-10-2014 05:59 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 10900705)
This is stupid. They should encourage the use not prevent it.


Is HGH unhealthy over time or does it actually help you construct a healthy body as you use it with a sensible diet and a reasonable workout plan? I don't really fully understand how it works. I'm wondering if it should be on the banned list or not.

BigMeatballDave 09-10-2014 06:17 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Count Zarth (Post 10879604)
He'll have more yards in 12 games than any of our WRs get in 16 games.
Way to step out on a limb, there.

Look at you. Making a bold prediction about an elite WR.

philfree 09-10-2014 06:22 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10901079)
Is HGH unhealthy over time or does it actually help you construct a healthy body as you use it with a sensible diet and a reasonable workout plan? I don't really fully understand how it works. I'm wondering if it should be on the banned list or not.

Yeah and at 53 years of age if can help me with no bad side effects then I want some.

penguinz 09-10-2014 06:33 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10901079)
Is HGH unhealthy over time or does it actually help you construct a healthy body as you use it with a sensible diet and a reasonable workout plan? I don't really fully understand how it works. I'm wondering if it should be on the banned list or not.
If taken properly and not abused it is very safe. It does not build muscle like roids but does help your body recover and repair much quicker.

Mile High Mania 09-11-2014 10:22 AM
Either way, Welker needs to sit... I'm fine with him coming back for week 3, but given the defense, it's likely best that he sits his noggin out of that game too.

ODESSABRONC 09-11-2014 11:29 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mile High Mania (Post 10902704)
Either way, Welker needs to sit... I'm fine with him coming back for week 3, but given the defense, it's likely best that he sits his noggin out of that game too.
He has a four game suspension. I know it is possible Welker could be back sooner but that is only if the NFL was able to get the rule put him changed. That's also contingent on the NFL retroactively shortening his suspension.

listopencil 09-12-2014 06:43 PM
ENGLEWOOD, Colo. -- With the terms of a new drug policy now in place, wide receiver Wes Welker returned to the Denver Broncos Friday night and is eligible to play Sunday against the Kansas City Chiefs if the team chooses to put him in the lineup, a source told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter.

http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?story...rc=desktop&wjb

Coochie liquor 09-12-2014 06:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by listopencil (Post 10906691)
ENGLEWOOD, Colo. -- With the terms of a new drug policy now in place, wide receiver Wes Welker returned to the Denver Broncos Friday night and is eligible to play Sunday against the Kansas City Chiefs if the team chooses to put him in the lineup, a source told ESPN NFL Insider Adam Schefter.

http://m.espn.go.com/nfl/story?story...rc=desktop&wjb
This is so stupid. I he wasn't on the Dung-keys, and they weren't trying to gift wrap him a SB he would have to serve his full suspension as he did it before the rule changed. I don't know how a Dung-keys fan can even be proud if they happen to win a SB this year. Oh wait yes I do.... Cuz they're Dung-keys fans!!

mikeyis4dcats. 09-12-2014 08:17 PM
I just don't see how this should be retroactive.

MagicHef 09-12-2014 08:23 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coochie liquor (Post 10906707)
This is so stupid. I he wasn't on the Dung-keys, and they weren't trying to gift wrap him a SB he would have to serve his full suspension as he did it before the rule changed. I don't know how a Dung-keys fan can even be proud if they happen to win a SB this year. Oh wait yes I do.... Cuz they're Dung-keys fans!!
Denver going to the super bowl depends on Welker being available from weeks 2-4?

Rain Man 09-12-2014 08:30 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10907062)
Denver going to the super bowl depends on Welker being available from weeks 2-4?

If he gets suspended, the Broncos will lose market share among 14 to 17 year-old teen girls in the high-income suburban geek market segment. Given the spending power of that segment, a Broncos setback could put them behind Johnny Manziel given his domination of the Texas roofie-buying 21 to 24 male market.

So yes, losing Welker from Weeks 2 through 4 could cost Denver a Super Bowl.

Coochie liquor 09-12-2014 09:50 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagicHef (Post 10907062)
Denver going to the super bowl depends on Welker being available from weeks 2-4?
It gives them the extra weapon earlier. And their schedule is as hard as ours. You think it's not an advantage?? Plus what Rainman said!!

vailpass 09-12-2014 10:12 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeyis4dcats. (Post 10907041)
I just don't see how this should be retroactive.
It was part of what the NFLPA bargained for...

Pasta Little Brioni 09-12-2014 11:51 PM
League gets more pathetic by the day. Oh well he is a soft player on a charmin soft team.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:57 PM.
Page 13 of 14 « First 39101112 13 14
Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.