ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Other Sports Big 10 Report: Conference Realignment (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=227561)

kepp 06-07-2010 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805373)
Basketball is just a nice little gem that some of us keep in our back pocket.

Actually, its more like that huge, over-packed wallet that tips you over to one side.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805535)
I'm not simply subtracting. Yes I'm making guestimations but when you look at the schools I listed they have HUGE separation between football and overall revenue.

Where's that coming from? tennis??

It's obviously CBB.

Do you guys not fill out office pools or something? Why are you pretending basketball doesn't exist?

Are you disregarding the specific numbers I've just listed for KU? Football makes more money than basketball at KU. Fact.

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by duncan_idaho (Post 6805544)
It's coming from donations, general budget allocations from universities, NCAA disbursements, etc. And yes, college basketball is the second-biggest money-maker... but it's clearly and distinctly No. 2.

If it wasn't, college hoops would be driving expansion.

It's certainly not all coming from basketball.

You didn't read my post. College basketball is making all it can.

College football isn't. There is more to be made based on cable television subscriptions. More people watch 11 games a year then they do 36 games per capita.

Getting the TV networks into cable subscriptions that's what it is. Why is this so hard to get?

MU is being invited for cable subscribers, not football. We've been over this.

MU is getting helped because of people living in Missouri. Many of which couldn't care less about the Tigers.

vailpass 06-07-2010 08:42 PM

Just got this piece of news from the SEC office — the revenue distribution for the 2009-10 fiscal year. It will make every conference save the Big Ten jealous … or depressed.

Total: $209 million.

According to the league, that’s the highest total in SEC history and represents a 57.7 percent increase from the $132.5 million distributed in 2008-2009.

Average per school: $17.3 million.

That’s about double (maybe a bit more than double) what the Pac-10 distributes to its schools and does not include what the schools generate from their local media deals.


Football TV: $109.5 million.

(Big 12 is in the $60 million range, I believe, while the Pac-10 in the 40s.)

Bowls: $26.5 million.

Football championship game: $14.5 million.

(You can see why Pac-10 commish Larry Scott is looking into a title game of his own.)

Basketball TV: $30 million

SEC tournament: $5 million

NCAA tournament: $23.5 million.

http://blogs.mercurynews.com/college...fallen-behind/

KcMizzou 06-07-2010 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805554)
Are you disregarding the specific numbers I've just listed for KU? Football makes more money than basketball at KU. Fact.

I think you can consider yourself disregarded.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by KcMizzou (Post 6805568)
I think you can consider yourself disregarded.

No shit.

This is an amazing display in the face of irrefutable evidence. But, but, but...

Bambi 06-07-2010 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805554)
Are you disregarding the specific numbers I've just listed for KU? Football makes more money than basketball at KU. Fact.

I don't know what those numbers are?

Are they after expenses?

Is that gross or net?

kepp 06-07-2010 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6805572)
No shit.

This is an amazing display in the face of irrefutable evidence. But, but, but...

It's actually a lot like the ku fans that were calling in to 810 this afternoon:

"But our basketball program is top 5..."
"I can't fathom that we'd be left out with our basketball program..."
etc, etc, etc

vailpass 06-07-2010 08:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805576)
I don't know what those numbers are?

Are they after expenses?

Is that gross or net?

dude.

kepp 06-07-2010 08:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805576)
I don't know what those numbers are?

Are they after expenses?

Is that gross or net?

I'm Ron Burgandy?

kepp 06-07-2010 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6805065)
Blair-Shannon my Freshman year, then moved to a house near the corner of East Monroe and South Kimbrough, just a couple blocks from JQH Arena.

The house and the parties were epic, my grades, however, were not.

Thus, I'm back in school many, many years later.

:D

Ah, you were in the plush, upscale dorm. I was in Freddy...the ghetto. But we had a lot of fun there.

Sure-Oz 06-07-2010 08:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kepp (Post 6805577)
It's actually a lot like the ku fans that were calling in to 810 this afternoon:

"But our basketball program is top 5..."
"I can't fathom that we'd be left out with our basketball program..."
etc, etc, etc

There were alot of those on 610 not understanding how this shit is working. Atleast the KU fans on here know wtf the deal is, $$$ period. "we got basketball" doesn't mean shit in this instance.

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 08:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805552)
CBS and TNT just paid $10.8 billion, that's billion with a "B" to broadcast the NCAA Men's Basketball Tournament. The game doesn't need defending.

Over 14 years. To be split by ALL schools that identify as D-I basketball schools (there are over 300). Even with 100 percent PURE profit, that deal chips in a mere $2.5 million a year/team (on average).

10.8 billion is a nice number. But you have to put it into context to really understand it.

duncan_idaho 06-07-2010 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wickedson (Post 6805560)
You didn't read my post. College basketball is making all it can.

College football isn't. There is more to be made based on cable television subscriptions. More people watch 11 games a year then they do 36 games per capita.

Getting the TV networks into cable subscriptions that's what it is. Why is this so hard to get?

MU is being invited for cable subscribers, not football. We've been over this.

MU is getting helped because of people living in Missouri. Many of which couldn't care less about the Tigers.

I "get it." I've "gotten it" for a long time.

I was at the forefront of people on this board talking about Big 10 expansion. I've been stumping from the beginning that this is a deal strictly about demographics and cable TV sets.

DeezNutz 06-07-2010 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 6805578)
dude.

LMAO. That's the sound of me ending this conversation.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.