ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Royals 2014 Royals Repository (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=279729)

BlackHelicopters 03-07-2014 12:59 PM

I can't believe I am saying this, but Hoch was valuable to this team last year . He succeeded where he was asked to succeed. Even though our bullpen is deep, I feel this is a major loss.

Fansy the Famous Bard 03-07-2014 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by theelusiveeightrop (Post 10471996)
I can't believe I am saying this, but Hoch was valuable to this team last year . He succeeded where he was asked to succeed. Even though our bullpen is deep, I feel this is a major loss.

Only because we are paying him $5 mil to do nothing. I have no doubt he will be replaceable.

penguinz 03-07-2014 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 10472027)
Only because we are paying him $5 mil to do nothing. I have no doubt he will be replaceable.

does not matter if he makes $5m or $500k. it is still a loss.

BlackHelicopters 03-07-2014 01:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 10472027)
Only because we are paying him $5 mil to do nothing. I have no doubt he will be replaceable.

Can only hope you are right on your replacement theory.

Fansy the Famous Bard 03-07-2014 01:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 10472080)
does not matter if he makes $5m or $500k. it is still a loss.

He's in a position that we will be able to replace his production internally. The loss of production from a monetary standpoint definitely matters when you are the Royals.

tk13 03-07-2014 02:01 PM

Hoch posted a sub-2 ERA and had 82 K in 70 IP. Those are great numbers. While he is overpaid... I'd say it's unlikely someone else steps up and pitches quite that well. Hope I'm wrong.

To be fair, there's no guarantee Hoch himself would repeat those numbers either.

CaliforniaChief 03-07-2014 02:04 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Dayton Moore on his latest talks with Ervin Santana: “I don’t think it’s anything that we’re going to be able to work with.&quot; Status quo.</p>&mdash; Andy McCullough (@McCulloughStar) <a href="https://twitter.com/McCulloughStar/statuses/442022820348829696">March 7, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

ChiTown 03-07-2014 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 10472126)
Hoch posted a sub-2 ERA and had 82 K in 70 IP. Those are great numbers. While he is overpaid... I'd say it's unlikely someone else steps up and pitches quite that well. Hope I'm wrong.

To be fair, there's no guarantee Hoch himself would repeat those numbers either.

A far more salient point, IMO.

BlackHelicopters 03-07-2014 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 10472126)
Hoch posted a sub-2 ERA and had 82 K in 70 IP. Those are great numbers. While he is overpaid... I'd say it's unlikely someone else steps up and pitches quite that well. Hope I'm wrong.

To be fair, there's no guarantee Hoch himself would repeat those numbers either.

Hope you are wrong ,too.

CaliforniaChief 03-07-2014 02:09 PM

<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>One reason Brad Penny was released: He injured his non-throwing hand punching a wall on Thursday, source says.</p>&mdash; Andy McCullough (@McCulloughStar) <a href="https://twitter.com/McCulloughStar/statuses/442028361892655105">March 7, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

LMAO At least he hit one thing he aimed for.

Fansy the Famous Bard 03-07-2014 02:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 10472126)
Hoch posted a sub-2 ERA and had 82 K in 70 IP. Those are great numbers. While he is overpaid... I'd say it's unlikely someone else steps up and pitches quite that well. Hope I'm wrong.

To be fair, there's no guarantee Hoch himself would repeat those numbers either.

You can't expect a guy with a track record in 800+ innings of a 5+ ERA ball to repeat his anomaly season. the guy's WHIP was cut in half last season from the norm... that's great, he had a great year... but to expect that to all of a sudden be his norm is mindbogglingly insane.

BlackHelicopters 03-07-2014 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CaliforniaChief (Post 10472149)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>One reason Brad Penny was released: He injured his non-throwing hand punching a wall on Thursday, source says.</p>&mdash; Andy McCullough (@McCulloughStar) <a href="https://twitter.com/McCulloughStar/statuses/442028361892655105">March 7, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

LMAO At least he hit one thing he aimed for.

Walls are big and easy to hit.

tk13 03-07-2014 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 10472157)
You can't expect a guy with a track record in 800+ innings of a 5+ ERA ball to repeat his anomaly season. the guy's WHIP was cut in half last season from the norm... that's great, he had a great year... but to expect that to all of a sudden be his norm is mindbogglingly insane.

Why not? It was different last year because he wasn't starting, he wasn't trying to pace himself. He was able to go sling it. Now maybe he wouldn't post a sub-2 ERA, but he could've still been effective.

Fansy the Famous Bard 03-07-2014 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tk13 (Post 10472164)
Why not? It was different last year because he wasn't starting, he wasn't trying to pace himself. He was able to go sling it. Now maybe he wouldn't post a sub-2 ERA, but he could've still been effective.

he could've been effective... not arguing that... But the royals are in no shortage of quality relievers.

The point you're avoiding is that he's replaceable at a fraction of the cost. (I was vehemently against him being on the roster last year.. imo he is all that is wrong with Dayton Moore)

What really sucks from a discussion standpoint is that we'll probably never know reagarding Hoch in the future... He'll come back from TJ Surgery but we won't be able to tell if last season was or wasn't a fluke definitively. :(

WhawhaWhat 03-07-2014 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zeke (Post 10472174)
The point you're avoiding is that he's replaceable at a fraction of the cost. (I was vehemently against him being on the roster last year.. imo he is all that is wrong with Dayton Moore)

You are assuming that if the Royals didn't spend $5 mil on Hochevar that they would have spent it somewhere else.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:39 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.