ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Funny Stuff New Conference re-alignment thread (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=249847)

patteeu 09-29-2011 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7952962)
This travel stuff cracks me up.

If there are 12 teams in two divisions BYU and WVU would make the trip once every four years since they'd be in different divisions.

And sitting in a plane an extra hour is not a deal breaker.

I agree that it's not a deal breaker and not nearly as big a deal as some would make out of it, but to be fair, football isn't the only sport that would be affected by the travel issues.

DJ's left nut 09-29-2011 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7952962)
This travel stuff cracks me up.

If there are 12 teams in two divisions BYU and WVU would make the trip once every four years since they'd be in different divisions.

And sitting in a plane an extra hour is not a deal breaker.

No kidding.

We're talking an hour, maybe 2, in additional travel time on any given weekend.

The travel tripe means nothing.

HemiEd 09-29-2011 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 7952873)
They aren't.

There are way WAY too many things that would have to fall into place, most of which are very much opposite of the character of the parties involved, for me to believe this will actually happen.

But if it does, I'm convinced it's because Gary Pinkel's open frustration has the fanbase riled up and the BOC has taken notice. Like I said when I first heard him say it a month or so ago - Gary Pinkel is not one to launch shots across the bow. If he's saying this, he's very VERY angry about it.

And Pinkel holds a hell of a lot of sway right now.

As he should, he has delivered, and improved that program dramatically. If he could just figure out how to beat the Sooners, there would be no stopping them.

|Zach| 09-29-2011 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 7953001)
As he should, he has delivered, and improved that program dramatically. If he could just figure out how to beat the Sooners, there would be no stopping them.

Did it last year.

They just have to keep improving and putting themselves in cyclical positions to be contenders.

HemiEd 09-29-2011 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnchiefsguy (Post 7952867)
And apparently twitter is all abuzz now because the Mizzou Lacrosse coach was fired. I have to admit, I don't recall knowing that Mizzou had a Lacrosse team.

ROFL

vailpass 09-29-2011 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7952962)
This travel stuff cracks me up.

If there are 12 teams in two divisions BYU and WVU would make the trip once every four years since they'd be in different divisions.

And sitting in a plane an extra hour is not a deal breaker.

Say what you will but geographic proximity makes for stronger ties and fiercer rivalries in college ball.

An extra hour on the plane you say? What about the swim teams and lacrosse teams and all the other teams that don't have that kind of air travel budget?

HemiEd 09-29-2011 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by |Zach| (Post 7953014)
Did it last year.

They just have to keep improving and putting themselves in cyclical positions to be contenders.

I missed that, kudos to him. Then he lost to the Huskers and TT on the road, but a very good season.

Stewie 09-29-2011 02:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7953024)
Say what you will but geographic proximity makes for stronger ties and fiercer rivalries in college ball.

An extra hour on the plane you say? What about the swim teams and lacrosse teams and all the other teams that don't have that kind of air travel budget?

It's no longer about rivalries. It's about going somewhere that seems stable.

As for the other sports travel, they already travel 1000s of miles. I'm not an expert, but I'd imagine that Iowa State women's softball flies to Lubbock every once in a while and vice versa.

vailpass 09-29-2011 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7953032)
It's no longer about rivalries. It's about going somewhere that seems stable.

As for the other sports travel, they already travel 1000s of miles. I'm not an expert, but I'd imagine that Iowa State women's softball flies to Lubbock every once in a while and vice versa.

So glad I'm B10 where we don't have to say shit like that.
SEC might not agree with it either.

Stewie 09-29-2011 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7953115)
So glad I'm B10 where we don't have to say shit like that.
SEC might not agree with it either.

The old rivalries die, but Nebraska moving to the Big 10 and aTm to the SEC doesn't create any great rivalry interest. Colorado to the PAC is really boring. It's money for money's sake.

I was listening to an interesting point on the radio today that said this isn't over. The small guys in the big conferences will feel the heat. That is, why would Northwestern or Miss. State remain parts of those conferences? Tradition is no longer an issue. It's TV contracts that's the end game.

vailpass 09-29-2011 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7953184)
The old rivalries die, but Nebraska moving to the Big 10 and aTm to the SEC doesn't create any great rivalry interest. Colorado to the PAC is really boring. It's money for money's sake.

I was listening to an interesting point on the radio today that said this isn't over. The small guys in the big conferences will feel the heat. That is, why would Northwestern or Miss. State remain parts of those conferences? Tradition is no longer an issue. It's TV contracts that's the end game.

You mean the old Big8 rivalries die and I think that sucks. The rest of the country still has their tradition.
Why wouldn't Northwestern remain B10? Whoever asked that is a dumbass.

mnchiefsguy 09-29-2011 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7953184)
The old rivalries die, but Nebraska moving to the Big 10 and aTm to the SEC doesn't create any great rivalry interest. Colorado to the PAC is really boring. It's money for money's sake.

I was listening to an interesting point on the radio today that said this isn't over. The small guys in the big conferences will feel the heat. That is, why would Northwestern or Miss. State remain parts of those conferences? Tradition is no longer an issue. It's TV contracts that's the end game.

Where is Northwestern or Miss. State going to go to get a better TV deal than what they have now?

Stewie 09-29-2011 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 7953194)
You mean the old Big8 rivalries die and I think that sucks. The rest of the country still has their tradition.
Why wouldn't Northwestern remain B10? Whoever asked that is a dumbass.

It was strictly a financial question about small schools in big conferences that aren't successful in athletics, but are protected by being a part of the conference. Would the Big 10 dump Northwestern if they could get Notre Dame? Would the SEC dump Miss. State if they could get Texas?

The point being made was if it's all about TV, why would these conferences bat an eye at dumping irrelevant programs?

Saulbadguy 09-29-2011 03:21 PM

The University of Chicago has a standing invite to the Big 10.

Titty Meat 09-29-2011 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stewie (Post 7953184)
The old rivalries die, but Nebraska moving to the Big 10 and aTm to the SEC doesn't create any great rivalry interest. Colorado to the PAC is really boring. It's money for money's sake.

I was listening to an interesting point on the radio today that said this isn't over. The small guys in the big conferences will feel the heat. That is, why would Northwestern or Miss. State remain parts of those conferences? Tradition is no longer an issue. It's TV contracts that's the end game.

You don't think Nebraska/Iowa, Nebraska/OSU could be good?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:30 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.