![]() |
The only reason I could entertain this as possible is I think Mahomes, Reid and Veach are all getting antsy to get back to the MVPat offense.
There’s a world where I could see Veach adding another weapon in an attempt to force that issue. That said, I don’t think it’s likely nor makes much sense. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I think we are just an LT away from this again, Mahomes just needs like +1 more second on average to throw. Don't know if we need a $25M WR to make this happen, but Veach knows best |
Quote:
Now if Veach is able to fix LT and RB while also finding a way to add DK Metcalf then I’m not going to say no to that either. |
Quote:
BUT I was more saying a DK trade screams Veach and how he likes to make bold splashy moves. If LT wasn’t an issue I could see him already trading for DK. Would it really surprise anyone if Veach, Signs Stanley AND trades for DK? I mean would it really? |
Quote:
I hope he goes all in like he never has before and we just fist the rest of the league. I really feel like it just might happen. |
Quote:
I like what you are suggesting....but one question: What if the price for Metcalf was a 3rd or 4th this year? I have seen some reports saying that the best Seattle could hope for was a 3rd or 4th. There is still the issue of finding cap space.... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I was thinking the same thing. 1 legitimate superstar far outweighs 3 unknown could be goods. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
DK Metcalf is not coming. You guys need to get over this nonsense.
|
I will do you one better: Luther Burden falls to 31, we draft him, then trade up to nab Judkins in rd 2 and use the rest of the draft on defense.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Metcalf is a pipe dream and a move like that probably closes the Chiefs window more than it opens it because its going to cost you draft capital which is you best way to manage the cap and its going to cost you some of your home grown talent because you are going to pay Metcalf instead of a guy like Karlaftis, and suddenly you look an awful lot like the Bengals...
Paying WRs 30M a year is no longer in vogue. Look at the 49ers. Teams are trying to trade away these contracts. Look at the Bengals, I don't know what the hell they are doing with Chase and Higgins, but its stupid. There are WRs that come out every year in the draft and contribute, or quickly become emerging stars. Hell unlike LT, college developes WRs all the time. Why over pay when you don't have to |
Quote:
but DK is not coming either. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:36 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.