ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football Aiyuk to the Steelers? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=354392)

Marcellus 08-08-2024 07:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17620377)
When we do that with Hardman "he's a worthless gadget player who can only get yards when you design a play to get him the football..."

When the 49ers do that with Deebo he's better than Aiyuk and an elite offensive weapon.

I am...puzzled.

Do gadget yards count or not, fellas?

We really comparing Hardman to a guy who had a season (16 game season) with almost 2,000 combined yards, 1400 of them receiving, and 15 total TD's? Really we doing that?

He had 12 total TDs last year in 15 games as well.

Come on man.

O.city 08-08-2024 07:43 AM

Deebo is a glorified RB that gets his yards around the LOS. He's a good player, but he's not really a guy you want at WR in a traditional offense.

staylor26 08-08-2024 07:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marcellus (Post 17621157)
We really comparing Hardman to a guy who had a season (16 game season) with almost 2,000 combined yards, 1400 of them receiving, and 15 total TD's? Really we doing that?

He had 12 total TDs last year in 15 games as well.

Come on man.

You're missing the point entirely dude.

And if it's all about production, why don't you post Aiyuk and Deebo's stats the last couple of years? :hmmm:

RunKC 08-08-2024 07:50 AM

Deebo is a lot like Rice. Great YAC ability, gadget role can be used with hmm, but he’s not gonna burn DB’s deep very often.

He’s not a good route runner either. McDuffie was running his routes for him in the SB. That’s embarrassing for a WR

ThaVirus 08-08-2024 08:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17620352)
Wait - this is a real debate?.

Yes. I wouldn’t argue that Aiyuk isn’t the more prototypical WR. He is 6’ with a 6’8” wingspan. If he didn’t have such mediocre speed I’d say he was basically created in a lab to be a WR.

But when you’re asking “who’s the better WR?”, you can’t just hand waive a bunch of elite qualities Deebo has that makes him the better player overall.

The argument doesn’t need to be rehashed here but bullet points:

-Aiyuk is clearly the fourth option on a star-studded offense, behind Deebo.

-Deebo’s last two seasons, when Aiyuk rose to prominence, have been marred by injury (not a coincidence, IMO).

-Deebo has a 1,400 receiving yard season under his belt. You don’t get that by catching a bunch of dump offs and swing passes all season. He can clearly run big boy routes and separate.

The major issue with this debate is simply timing, I think. Deebo has been heavily injured the last two seasons and Aiyuk is coming off of a career year. At their best, I think Deebo is the better player and I think many would agree.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 17620377)
When we do that with Hardman "he's a worthless gadget player who can only get yards when you design a play to get him the football..."

When the 49ers do that with Deebo he's better than Aiyuk and an elite offensive weapon.

I am...puzzled.

Do gadget yards count or not, fellas?

I’ve actually come around on Hardman. He’s helped us win three Super Bowls now. He is a bit of a disappointment but ultimately a pretty decent 2nd round pick overall.

Though I will say that the cases are different. Deebo has been a stud for San Fran since his rookie year. He’s clearly a leader on his team to this day.

Meanwhile Hardman struggled to crack the starting lineup. He did come in behind Tyreek and Sammy at WR in addition to basically being the fifth option after Kelce and whichever RB we were starting so I’ll give him some leeway there. But even when Sammy was hurt and/or left the team/RBs came and went, it seemed like the coaches turned to Pringle and Robinson more than Hardman.

They’ve both got injury concerns but for different reasons so it’s kind of a wash there.

Hardman also has a career year of 693 receiving yards to Deebo’s 1,405. In additions to that 1,400 receiving yards, Deebo contributed 350 rushing yards and 8 rushing TDs. At his best, Hardman really was just an elite gadget guy who might be good for an occasional big catch downfield once every few games while Deebo was a featured weapon.

staylor26 08-08-2024 08:33 AM

Quote:

Aiyuk is clearly the fourth option on a star-studded offense, behind Deebo.
He's been their leading receivier the last 2 years, so no matter how many times you say this, it's not remotely true.

There's not a single WR1 on any team that is their "fourth option".

It is embarrassing that you would try to argue that he's behind Kittle too. That's just ****ing reeruned.

O.city 08-08-2024 08:50 AM

The 9ers had Deebo in the backfield alot the past few years. He's never been a traditional WR.

staylor26 08-08-2024 08:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 17621242)
The 9ers had Deebo in the backfield alot the past few years. He's never been a traditional WR.

"But but but versatility!"

O.city 08-08-2024 08:57 AM

Don't get me wrong, I like Deebo. Good player, would love him here with Andy.

But if I want a WR that can really run a route and get open? Nah.

Sassy Squatch 08-08-2024 08:58 AM

Not sure why we're hand waving away the durability issue. It's a constant issue with him.

staylor26 08-08-2024 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sassy Squatch (Post 17621250)
Not sure why we're hand waving away the durability issue. It's a constant issue with him.

It's almost as if his skill set is less valuable because he has to take more of a pounding, like a RB.

mr. tegu 08-08-2024 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 17621208)
-Deebo has a 1,400 receiving yard season under his belt. You don’t get that by catching a bunch of dump offs and swing passes all season. He can clearly run big boy routes and separate.

Besides that being a huge outlier season for him, that’s literally exactly what they were. Over 50% of his 1400 receiving yards, 768, were YAC that season. His average depth of catch, 8.3, was LESS than his average YAC, 10.

In that same offense this past season Aiyuk had 1342 yards but only 382 YAC. His depth of catch was 12.8. A Quick Look at other top receivers guys shows similar percentages for YAC and depth of target on big seasons.

staylor26 08-08-2024 09:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mr. tegu (Post 17621257)
Besides that being a huge outlier season for him, that’s literally exactly what they were. Over 50% of his 1400 receiving yards, 768, were YAC that season. His average depth of catch, 8.3, was LESS than his average YAC, 10.

In that same offense this past season Aiyuk had 1342 yards but only 382 YAC. His depth of catch was 12.8. A Quick Look at other top receivers guys shows similar percentages for YAC and depth of target on big seasons.

This is why him continuing to bring up his 1,400 yard season is reeruned. No, having a 1,400 yard season under his belt does not automatically mean he's a route runner that can separate consistently. Imagine being that ****ing lazy to think you can just point to 1,400 yards and think you proved something.

ToxSocks 08-08-2024 09:13 AM

I imagine the 49ers will be parting ways with Deebo after the season. So acting like its an either or thing, "which would you rather keep" is kinda meh. I expect them both gone. He carries a $24M cap charge next season.

Hoover 08-08-2024 09:13 AM

I think it’s crazy that the 49ers have one year left in their window with a cheap rookie QB and instead of every being on board to win a Super Bowl, they are demanding trades or holding out for big contracts. We are blessed. Hell the Chris Jones crap last year sucked but wasn’t this bad.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:17 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.