ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Football WR Wes Welker has been suspended four games for use of amphetamines (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=286164)

Marco Polo 09-10-2014 12:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10900169)
Every 2014 league year suspension will be reviewed, if deal is approved. Josh Gordon failed his drug test in 2013, so wait and see on him.
— Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) September 10, 2014
<SCRIPT charset=utf-8 src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" async></SCRIPT>

I have Welker and Gordon stashed on my fantasy team so hoping for both.

Frosty 09-10-2014 12:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsandO'sfan (Post 10900169)
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" lang="en"><p>Every 2014 league year suspension will be reviewed, if deal is approved. Josh Gordon failed his drug test in 2013, so wait and see on him.</p>&mdash; Ian Rapoport (@RapSheet) <a href="https://twitter.com/RapSheet/status/509765654426427392">September 10, 2014</a></blockquote>
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>

This is kind of bullshit, imo. The penalty for breaking the rules should be whatever was in place at the time the rules were broken.

Old Dog 09-10-2014 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 10900184)
This is kind of bullshit, imo. The penalty for breaking the rules should be whatever was in place at the time the rules were broken.

concur

Garcia Bronco 09-10-2014 12:36 PM

I also concur

Dinny Bossa Nova 09-10-2014 12:50 PM

Welker is not going to play?

Hang on, man. Lemme do some rithmatic.






















We're still ****ed.

Dinny

staylor26 09-10-2014 01:12 PM

I just don't see how the NFL can let a bunch of suspended players back on the field after this Ray Rice fiasco.

saphojunkie 09-10-2014 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 10900184)
This is kind of bullshit, imo. The penalty for breaking the rules should be whatever was in place at the time the rules were broken.

This attitude just baffles me, except that it has to just be that none of the players are Chiefs.

penguinz 09-10-2014 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dinny Blues (Post 10900239)
Welker is not going to play?

Hang on, man. Lemme do some rithmatic.






















We're still ****ed.

Dinny

Your and idiot. It is ciphering not rithmatic.

Frosty 09-10-2014 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 10900303)
This attitude just baffles me, except that it has to just be that none of the players are Chiefs.

Why? It's the way the law works. If they legalize pot, they don't just open the jails and let everyone convicted for dealing pot go. I don't see why this should be different. They broke the "laws" (rules) that were in place at the time so should pay the penalty that was in place at the time. I would feel that way no matter who it was.

ThaVirus 09-10-2014 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Frosty (Post 10900334)
Why? It's the way the law works. If they legalize pot, they don't just open the jails and let everyone convicted for dealing pot go. I don't see why this should be different. They broke the "laws" (rules) that were in place at the time so should pay the penalty that was in place at the time. I would feel that way no matter who it was.


I understand your point, but disagree.

I think anyone serving a punishment for a "crime" that is deemed no longer criminal should have their punishment lifted.

ct 09-10-2014 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ThaVirus (Post 10900575)
I understand your point, but disagree.

I think anyone serving a punishment for a "crime" that is deemed no longer criminal should have their punishment lifted.

If this were his 1st offense or even 1st suspension (as the policy doesn't suspend for 1st offense), but given this as a 3rd offense, even if very low amount on the test, I don't see a full lifting of the suspension. Best case, my guess is reduced to 8 games. Just my own opinion.

I'm also puzzled why welker's suspension is even being brought up. He didn't test positive for pot, why are we even talking about him?

Hear me out on this last one. If they are going to review all 2014 suspensions, most assume it will be under the approach of 'were we too harsh?' However, consider the very fresh Ray Rice fiasco. I could very easily see Greg Hardy getting SMACKED down hard, very very hard!! If they are going to review for possible lightening of suspensions, they should also review for increasing suspensions under the strengthened domestic violence policy.

vailpass 09-10-2014 03:23 PM

NFL: we want to test for hgh
NFLPA: we want higher thresholds for other drugs in return and we want it retroactive

Negotiation in process

notorious 09-10-2014 03:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10900691)
NFL: we want to test for hgh
NFLPA: we want higher thresholds for other drugs in return and we want it retroactive

Negotiation in process

This.

penguinz 09-10-2014 03:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by vailpass (Post 10900691)
NFL: we want to test for hgh
NFLPA: we want higher thresholds for other drugs in return and we want it retroactive

Negotiation in process

This is stupid. They should encourage the use not prevent it.

notorious 09-10-2014 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by penguinz (Post 10900705)
This is stupid. They should encourage the use not prevent it.

This, too.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:36 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.