Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8780812)

Thank you.

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8780776)

If it makes you feel better, then sure. Go ahead and make one.

I'm supporting Stanzi because he's the best QB on the roster. That's all. I wanted us to suck for Luck. Then I wanted us to trade up for RGIII. Then I wanted us to trade up for Tannehill. My desire to find a legitimate 1st round QB is well-documented.

Starting Stanzi either gets us better production than Cassel, or it gets us more losses than Cassel. More losses get us a better shot at a real QB (since this franchise has demonstrated it doesn't give a flying **** about trading up to get the right guy). If it goes the other way, then we have an upgrade from Cassel.

People who oppose this kind of astound me. But it's not my problem or responsibility to make them understand. So whatever. They can keep on thinking another 27:7 season from Cassel will get us a playoff win. I'd rather be more realistic.

Originally Posted by TEX (Post 8780814)

IF Stanzi really is the "Best QB on the roster" then we are in DEEP, DEEP $HIT this season. :hmmm:

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8780696)

And if this guy ballsacks it up in preseason. Can we have an excuse thread for him?

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 8780835)

We've been making excuses for our starter for 30 ****'n years.

Why not the b/u as well?...

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8780776)

If it makes you feel better, then sure. Go ahead and make one.

I'm supporting Stanzi because he's the best QB on the roster. That's all. I wanted us to suck for Luck. Then I wanted us to trade up for RGIII. Then I wanted us to trade up for Tannehill. My desire to find a legitimate 1st round QB is well-documented.

Starting Stanzi either gets us better production than Cassel, or it gets us more losses than Cassel. More losses get us a better shot at a real QB (since this franchise has demonstrated it doesn't give a flying **** about trading up to get the right guy). If it goes the other way, then we have an upgrade from Cassel.

People who oppose this kind of astound me. But it's not my problem or responsibility to make them understand. So whatever. They can keep on thinking another 27:7 season from Cassel will get us a playoff win. I'd rather be more realistic.

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8780840)

Can't support the draft position argument before the season even starts But another thing that really bothers me about our QB situation is that we're getting to a point where we're going to waste the careers of DJ, Hali, Flowers, etc.

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 8780840)

Can't support the draft position argument before the season even starts But another thing that really bothers me about our QB situation is that we're getting to a point where we're going to waste the careers of DJ, Hali, Flowers, etc.

Not listing Bowe on purpose, obviously.

Originally Posted by Rausch (Post 8780842)

Kind of like DT, Shields, and Gonzo?...

Originally Posted by Reerun_KC (Post 8780843)

So many careers have been wasted in KC... They are just added to a long list of players...

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 8780825)

WTF is HIT? That's not a value of dollars, or any other currency.

You're allowed to type "shit", you do know that, right?

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8780845)

Whose career has been "wasted" in Kansas City?

Originally Posted by DaneMcCloud (Post 8780845)

Whose career has been "wasted" in Kansas City?