I'd be pissed too. He should have came out after his 2006 season. He had almost identical numbers to what sanchez had. His one year of college experience was enough to warrant him a top 3 pick huh? But what do you know, he fell off the next year which could happen to Sanchez.

I want to see a qb do good for more than one year before I give him 70 million dollars and the reigns to an NFL team.

Exactly. He says focusing on "glamour positions" is stupid because you're missing pieces, yet it's smart to focus solely on the o-line until it's completely invincible. That's not even possible.

Build the team AS A TEAM.

Thanks for the insults but quite honestly, I've stated my case for Sanchez and Stafford numerous times in this forum and I'm pretty sure that most people are sick of me reiterating myself at every turn.

I know I am.

So in brief, never pass on a potential franchise QB. Sanchez is extremely accurate and smart, has ideal size and athleticism and despite your "one year" claim, he was at USC for four full years. Furthermore, the guy was like the #1 overall player his recruiting year. He has the tools and the brains to be a franchise player.

In that case, there is no possible reason to pass on him. If you think Cassel's good after NEVER starting at USC, then you wait until Sanchez hits the NFL.

Lights out.

Not arguing with you. It is a good call to pick a qb in the first round......if he deserves to be drafted there. Sanchez cannot be the third player selected in a football draft. I refuse to believe he is worthy. Maybe a mid first, but never a 3rd pick. One year shouldn't get you that far.

Well gee. Maybe it's not all about college stats?

:doh!: He's only had one season starting on the football team. Sorry I have to clear it up for you, I thought you'd be smart enough to figure it out. And yeah, he's been at USC for 4 years, yet never started until this year. After you're redshirted, you should start your redshirt freshman year.

I believe that Scott Pioli is probably working on a way to bring Matt Cassell to KC to be our QB.

I dont care what anybody says, New England was a dangerous team to play at the end of the year, it took them time to adjust to Matt.

Yeah, I'm sure he's a leader and will make this offense the #1 offense. Hell, he'll probably switch up and be D end on defensive series!! Sanchez is superman!!

You've missed the point. I mentioned Leinart because HE RETURNED TO USC FOR ANOTHER YEAR. How much did that extra year of experience help him?

You post over at WPI....don't you.

Not at USC.

And as for Leinart, he was drafted by Dennis Green to play in the West Coast offense. He was fired and the new offense is a vertical offense, not Leinart's strong point.

The Cardinals should not have drafted him if they thought there was a chance they'd fired Dennis Green. Square peg, round hole.

Leinart will still be a productive, if not highly successful NFL QB.

I believe that as always, you are incorrect.

He started three games in 2007 and played in several others, also.

What ever helps you sleep at night mr sarcastic. Why is Sanchez so highly rated? I understand Stafford, but Sanchez? Why?

LMAO