![]() |
Has KU been invited to the B1G yet? ACC?
Mountain West? Missouri Valley? |
Nothing will happen anytime soon I don't think but my gut tells me it will be the B1G.
lol at Mountain West or Missouri Valley, they'd stay in the Big 12 and expand before they did that I'm seeing a lot of smoke on twitter that KU is moving back towards investing big money in the football stadium again and that it is because of the B1G |
Quote:
Stupidity reigns supreme in the now defunct Big 12. |
Quote:
American Conference? What’s that? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I mean, even if we haven't been nationally competitive recently there's still the possibility that we could build up to it in the future and being in the SEC makes that possible, long-term. If we had stayed in the Big 12 we might have ended up in the B1G eventually, but we could also have ended up in a mid major conference like KSU or ISU probably will, and that would have been fatal to any aspirations of being a national champion one day, or even just a program with a national profile. I don't think there is any argument that it was the right move, that has been pretty much settled with the Big 12 breaking up in mid-air |
Quote:
A decade later, perhaps the B1G would have been a better fit into terms of competitiveness (had they come calling), but the SEC realignment might help and of course it's better to pull the trigger when the SEC comes calling than wait it out. Quote:
|
Quote:
I honestly don't care much about football, but I get it. I'm really fine with going to the Big East at last resort (if no B1G or ACC) since they are a basketball major. Maybe we could then go football only in MTN West or something - but really - who cares about KU football. |
I mean, I care about football. It would be really fun to have the program get revived with Leipold and then play meaningful games against teams like Michigan.
2008 was a blast. Those games against MU in Arrowhead were incredible. |
Quote:
That is all. |
Are you talking about basketball and Kentucky
|
Quote:
UK's bench some years could probably finish top 3 in that conference. And that's an arbitrary metric, of course, but a metric that a conference could be proud of by saying a large number of teams routinely make the tournament. |
Quote:
Doesn’t mean as much as a title, though. I view Calipari’s legacy at Kentucky as disappointing if he does not win another title. |
Quote:
|
PAC releases statement that they are not pursuing expansion at this time.
|
Quote:
I don’t care about bids. All I care about is titles. B12 has 3 schools with basketball titles(OK St., KU, Baylor). SEC has 3(Florida, UK, Arkansas). I don’t see the difference? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
The real test will be if/when the Big12 moves to expand. Schools that vote no to expansion likely know they have a new home.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
A team winning one title 50 years ago does not equal sustained recent success. Gonzaga hasn't won a title but has been one of the top programs for the last 20 years - UTEP has a title. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
I really really don't want some Rupp Rafters idiotic conference argument to mosey on over |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
They need to add BYU and Boise State (with the requirement of changing the field), and then UCF and Houston (if the Texas schools will allow it) or Cincinnati (if they won’t). It’s not perfect. But it has potential.
|
Quote:
Amazon has reached out to the Big12 about picking up their media rights. But they want the Big12 to expand to 14-16 schools. They are in a position where media foot print doesn’t matter, like it did to the B1G the last round. They just want fanbases/streamers. They can make a ton of money from advertising their own products of said schools and making the sale on shirts and what not. They also want more sports fans subscribing because they are picking up Thursday night football, and now trying for Sunday Ticket. But to get to 14, I’d add BYU, Cincinnati, UCF, Houston, Memphis, and Cincinnati. The crazy part is that’s suddenly the most competitive conference. Other than Kansas, there’s a lot of good football teams. And there’s no Alabama, Clemson, Oklahoma, Ohio State to just run the table most years. It wouldn’t have the top 1-2 schools that every other conference has, but outside that top to bottom it’s better. Unfortunately to the media the top school is what makes a conference. |
Quote:
Gotta get Cinci in there twice for good measure. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I’m a BYU guy, so I’d love to see them get their foot in the door. I’d love expansion by six. I’m not a fan of Memphis. But I suppose it could make regional sense. Colorado State could be good, projecting into the future. There are good things going on there. But it wouldn’t get anyone excited now. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
In the grand scheme I think this is a test for Amazon, where in the next wave of media contracts they try to take on as much of college football as they can, and same with NFL. |
Time to Expand the Big 12 to the Big 16!
It's time, time to get what you can while you can, before it's too late! This includes going after some programs hard to get the TV markets.
West Division - Plus TV Market BYU - SLC Boise State - Well, Boise and most of the Mtn Zone CU / Co State - Denver ( I prefer CU over Co St.) Seriously doubt CU would, less $$ Baylor - Waco, Austin, Central Tx. KSU - Not much, western Ks, Wichita and some KC KU - Same as KSU but a bigger national draw. TCU - Dallas/Ft Worth Tx Tech - West Texas East Division - PLus TV Market ISU - Des Moines OSU - Oklahoma & Texas Houston - Houston, East Tx Memphis - Memphis UC - Cincinnati West Virginia - ? You tell me, but good football & Basketball UCF - Orlando USF - Miami You can have 4 pods, BYU,Boise St,CU,Tx Tech KU,KSU,TCU,Baylor Houston,ISU,OSU,Memphis UCF,USF,WV, Cincy IMHO, it's all coming down to Super Conferences and the teams that don't move now is going to have a hard time landing into a competitive conference from top to bottom in football and basketball. Will it happen? Nope, just because, that's why. Would this be the best fit for the current 8 schools in the B12 ? I think so, but to get 8 more schools to jump all at once, going to take a very big sales job by somebody. So what am I missing here on this take ? It's not the SEC, but I think those 16 schools would give them a legitimate chance at claiming # 3 behind the SEC at times based on how good the recruiting goes. The Big10 will still be a step in front on the # 2 conference. So the fight for # 3 is ACC,Pac 12 and whatever can come about with the B12 ( err 16? ). You can possibly change up ISU for TCU in the divisions & pods. |
West Virginia would be DC and NoVA.
|
KU owns KC and Wichita, with a national following. They won't be in the Big 12 when this is over.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1aL7oCSx4JE |
Big 12 should trade Kansas to the BIG 10 for Nebraska
I mean Nebraska will do anything to win again right? |
The overriding sentiment that I'm hearing from various ties to Lawrence is that KU to the Big 10 can basically be considered a done deal at this point.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Nothing is going to happen until the OuuT mess gets figured out. When they are officially leaving, what the consequences will be, and so on. Everyone assumes OuuT are gone after this year, but the SEC’s media contract with ESPN doesn’t start until 24. Does CBS really want to fork out cash to pay for two schools that colluded with ESPN go outbid CBS? |
Quote:
There are nearly 3 times as many basketball games. |
I hope it doesn’t come to expansion, but if it does I’d go to 14. I think there’s 5 schools they can add that are better than a decent amount of P5 schools, my 6th has some history of being better. I’d add BYU, Cincinnati, Memphis, Houston, UCF, and Boise St. Take the risk of being the first conference to go to streaming. Amazon would likely pay more than Fox/CBS/ESPN. It also opens the door for Amazon to buy other conferences rights in the next wave 10 or so years down the road.
Top to bottom that’s a very competitive conference and would have a lot of good games. The obvious problem is there’s no blue blood at the top, since in this day and age the only thing that matters about a conference is it’s top 1-2 schools. |
With all the uncertainty surrounding the remnants of the Big12 I would be pretty surprised if many schools would be willing to gamble their future and jump on board
|
It'll become the Big Leftover complete with other conferences scraps
|
Quote:
Definitely will no longer be a Power 5 (4 now). KU will still probably suck at Football unless a miracle occurs. |
Quote:
|
Max Olson on Twitter-
The Big 12's current preference in expansion discussions is adding four members, sources tell @TheAthletic. BYU, UCF, Cincinnati and Houston are considered the leading contenders. Still a lot of work to be done. |
Quote:
Still would rather just shut down the Big 12. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
How are people this stupid still? Read the thread, slaver-U fans
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
Sad truth is KU's football can't get worse, but our basketball program will continue to bring in more viewers than probably both your football programs combined. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Those are some long flights, and the Big 12 already made scheduling concessions for WV so they could play 2 teams in the same week without having to go all the way back to WV in between. |
Quote:
|
ROFL KU fans still trying to hate on MU and it's a decade after they left the Big howevermany
Looks like the smartest decision ever now uncertainty makes you cranky, try a snickers |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Mizzouche sports is too irrelevant to hate. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:07 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.