ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Who should we trade for if Rice is out?

ChiefsPlanet (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)

- Nzoner's Game Room (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)

- -

Who should we trade for if Rice is out? (https://www.chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=355220)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dunerdr (Post 17748576)

Why should the worst nfc team care about sending Dionte to us?

No idea. Just read somewhere the other day that they weren't interested in trading Diontae to us. Thought I read it here on CP. Maybe it was just a rumor.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Megatron96 (Post 17748570)

Possibly. Though Williams didn't look good the other night. And he has injury issues. Thought I heard that Diontae wouldn't be traded to KC?

If Veach could make the above happen, great. Not going to hold my breath though.

Pittsburgh refused to trade Johnson to KC in the offseason, but Carolina likely wouldn’t have that same hesitation.

Also Veach’s former salary cap guru, Brandt Tilis, is Carolina’s Executive VP of Football Operations… that could help facilitate a deal.

I would take MVS and add him to the PS. I would cut Moore outright and trade for Diontae Johnson if possible. I have heard Hyatt from the Giants could be an option as well. Personally, I like what we have currently and if nothing happens then I am cool with it. However, if we were to get D. Johnson on a good deal then that only works in our favor "currently." We don't know when Hollywood or Pacheco will be available this season if at all. In Veach I trust.

Quote:

Originally Posted by smithandrew051 (Post 17748334)

Chris, I’m very concerned with our QB situation in 2039.

Our next QB is likely in 2nd grade right now. Haven’t heard of a pro ready second grader out there, who will be available at pick 32.

Very nervous.

Pfft. We will be picking 36 or 40.

Expansion teams.

As much as I'd like our Chiefs to make a big splashy trade for Tyreek or even Hopkins, seems to me we'd be just fine bringing MVS back and upgrading Ross. We're undefeated, currently, and assuming M. Brown returns for the playoffs we'll get a nice fresh addition for the final stretch. Hoping for more, but not like we're hurting too hard.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 17748562)

I don’t think anybodys saying we need to go “all in.” Just that we can take a chance or two. there are way more uncertainties in the future. What if we’re saving up for a future that doesn’t include Andy Reid or features a massively regressed mahomes. I’m not saying that will happen, but it is way more uncertain tomorrow than it is today.

I trust Andy to not let someone new screw it up. We’ve seen with guys like shady McCoy and leveon that if they don’t work, we aren’t going to use them. It’s all upside. There is such a low bar a sub has to clear. So while we may be fine without changing, if a move allows you to upgrade from a bad piece to a halfway decent one, is a small extra hurdle down the road all that bad? It’d be one thing if we’re talking about subbing average for great. We’re talking about replacing bad with “not bad.”

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gary Cooper (Post 17748568)

They don't need to mortgage the future. Neither the Bills nor Jets did that by acquiring Adams or Cooper. If the price is a 3rd rounder or worse to improve your SB chances this year, you take it. If Hollywood Brown was coming back soon, that's a different story. But we don't have that news unfortunately. If they're comfortable with Juju and Worthy as their top two WRs the rest of 2024, that's fine. It's just too risky IMO. If teams want a 2nd rounder or better because it's the Chiefs, then Veach should say no.

I’m not arguing that they shouldn’t trade for a receiver, but more giving up multiple picks for someone like a Tyreek. The Adams and Cooper deals would have been fine.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 17748603)

I’m not arguing that they shouldn’t trade for a receiver, but more giving up multiple picks for someone like a Tyreek. The Adams and Cooper deals would have been fine.

Yeah, multiple picks would be pushing it.

Veach should’ve tried to get Cooper, maybe he did, things like that we won’t know about.

Quote:

Originally Posted by neech (Post 17748620)

Veach should’ve tried to get Cooper, maybe he did, things like that we won’t know about.

Pretty sure I read somewhere in here that Veach did make an offer, but was outbid.

Quote:

Originally Posted by tredadda (Post 17748603)

I’m not arguing that they shouldn’t trade for a receiver, but more giving up multiple picks for someone like a Tyreek. The Adams and Cooper deals would have been fine.

Thats fair. Yeah we don’t need to go all in. We need to get someone within reason.

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 17748524)

Oh I was thinking it would lower the price of a draft pick for a WR or earn a draft pick in return. Carolina looks like the could use a good RB and if it meant Sending a 4th or 5th in exchange for Johnson (instead of an 3rd) and possibly a 5th or 6th back. That’s a win.

TSN seems to think we will trade Perine

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/...bd03ff8def7624

Quote:

Originally Posted by DenverChief (Post 17748650)

TSN seems to think we will trade Perine

https://www.sportingnews.com/us/nfl/...bd03ff8def7624

God I hope not. HB is the one position where we have depth. I get that the guy isn't a bit play waiting to happen but he's solid. He was a big part of why we lost to the Bangles that year.

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 17748636)

Thats fair. Yeah we don’t need to go all in. We need to get someone within reason.

You get one chance, if you're lucky, to win 3 straight super bowls. You absolutely go all in.

ESPN Suggests:

"Chiefs: D Hopkins
Titans: 5th RD Pick

Chiefs: M Sanders
Panthers: Conditional 6th RD Pick"

...I'm game for Hopkins, but happy with our RB squad.

Hopkins is old...they won't do that.

Johnson makes too much sense. It makes no sense why the Panthers wouldn't trade an impending FA in a year they're going no where, but bad teams stay bad for a reason.