ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Chiefs hire Steve Spagnuolo as new defensive coordinator (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=320876)

In58men 01-25-2019 10:31 AM

BleedingRed taught me “In Pioli We Trust”

staylor26 01-25-2019 10:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 14071786)
You seemed pretty excited in them pics u sent me

LMAO

The Franchise 01-25-2019 10:33 AM

I posted it last page....but I'll add it to the top of this page because I think it's a good article by Terez.

https://sports.yahoo.com/chiefs-andy...084228411.html

Quote:

Kansas City Chiefs coach Andy Reid did not try to reinvent the wheel amid pressure to hire a great defensive coordinator who can help maximize Patrick Mahomes’ championship window during the otherworldly quarterback’s rookie deal.

Instead, by hiring Steve Spagnuolo on Thursday, Reid tried to recapture the past, one filled with blitzing, aggression and — much to the pleasure of many Chiefs fans who had tired of the team’s often-passive 3-4 defensive scheme under Bob Sutton — lots of 4-3 fronts.

Critics of the move will point to Spagnuolo’s flaws. They’ll start with his roller-coaster history as a defensive coordinator, where for all of his Himalaya-like up seasons there were some equally porous down seasons. They’ll also talk about his age (59) and how he has made a lot of money during a career that included three seasons as an NFL head coach, making some wonder if he’ll grind the same way a young, first-time coordinator would.

Throw in the fact that Spagnuolo runs a 4-3 defense — which wouldn’t figure to jibe with the strengths of a team that has run a 3-4 system for over a decade — and it’s fair to wonder if he can get the unit up to speed before 2020, when the Chiefs’ salary-cap situation will be more congested due to the massive extension Mahomes will likely command the moment they can extend him (after the 2019 season).

While those concerns are fair — and Reid, 60, has surely been coaching long enough to understand them — Reid dismissed them and hired Spagnuolo anyway, for two main reasons.

Reason No. 1: Reid trusts the guy
The Chiefs came a defensive stop short of beating Reid’s archrival, Bill Belichick, and the New England Patriots in the AFC championship game. A win would have sent Reid to only his second Super Bowl in his 20 years as an NFL head coach.

Reid’s defensive coordinator during that Super Bowl season of 2004, when he was head coach of the Philadelphia Eagles, was the great Jim Johnson, whose brilliant, progressive blitz schemes from the 4-3 front allowed Reid to do what he did best, and focus fully on offense.

You know who was else on that staff? Spagnuolo, who was the linebackers coach under Johnson and spent eight years as an assistant under Reid before he was hired to run the New York Giants’ defense in 2007. So there’s a comfortable familiarity here for Reid, who prefers to promote from within when possible.

And that matters, though Spagnuolo’s results in his six seasons as a defensive coordinator since then have been decidedly mixed. His defenses have ranked an average of 18th in points per game, 19th in yards allowed and 17th in sacks, numbers that are largely close to (or even below) what Sutton has accomplished the past six years in Kansas City (ninth in points per game, 11th in sacks and 20th in yards allowed).

But while Spagnuolo has led some stinky defenses — particularly in 2012 and 2015, when his groups finished 30th or worse in points and yards allowed — when Spagnuolo’s defenses have been good, they’ve shown the ability to be championship good.


Unlike Sutton, who has twice had his passive, zone-heavy defenses absolutely dissected in the playoffs by the Patriots, Spagnuolo’s aggressive, pressure-heavy defense single-handedly ruined the Patriots’ perfect 2007 season in the Super Bowl with a masterful gameplan, one Reid hopes Spagnuolo can one day cajole from the league’s 31st-ranked defense the next time they face Brady and Belichick in the playoffs.

Reason No. 2: The 4-3 fits the new talent
It’s worth noting that Spagnuolo’s three best units — his 2007, 2008 and 2016 Giants — have all been powered by strong front sevens that the Chiefs might be better equipped to replicate.

The Chiefs spent three of their six 2018 NFL draft picks on players who could upgrade their front seven, and in retrospect, it’s probably not a coincidence that all three of them — defensive tackle Derrick Nnadi, defensive end Breeland Speaks and linebacker Dorian O’Daniel — were originally projected to be ideal fits in a 4-3 scheme during the draft process.


For instance, the 6-foot-3, 285-pound Speaks — a second-round pick who struggled to turn the corner as a 3-4 outside linebacker this season — projects as an ideal “power-based” end in Spagnuolo’s 4-3 scheme, someone who can reduce down between the tackle and tight end and defeat blocks to the run side with his power.

The 6-1, 220-pound O’Daniel was limited to a nickel or dime linebacker role in Sutton’s 3-4 scheme, but now the former third-round pick has the look of an ideal every-down weakside “run-and-hit” linebacker, while the run-stuffing Nnadi (6-1, 312 pounds), another third-round pick, held up fine as a 3-4 nose but could potentially clog the middle as the powerful one- or zero-technique Spagnuolo needs to make his zone-blitz scheme sing.

Even one more of the Chiefs’ acquisitions last offseason — middle linebacker Anthony Hitchens — is a better fit in the 4-3 scheme. Hitchens thrived as a versatile run-and-chase 4-3 linebacker in Dallas before signing a monster five-year, $45 million free-agent deal with the Chiefs last March. Hitchens often seemed tentative in the middle of the Chiefs’ 3-4 scheme, but a return to the 4-3 should do him some good.

But wait, there’s more!
Dee Ford ranked seventh in sacks (13) and fifth in pressures (29) as a 3-4 outside linebacker this season, but he put his hand in the dirt nearly every play in college and has the look of a 4-3 “rush” end, where quickness off the edge and pass-rush skill is mandatory in Spagnuolo’s system.

Meanwhile, it’s also easy to see emerging third-year pro Chris Jones — whose juice off the snap and long arms helped him rank third in sacks (15½) and fifth in pressures (29) this season — thriving as a three-technique gap-shooter in Spagnuolo’s system, a new role that could mitigate his occasional tendency to freelance vs. the run.

That’s six positions in the front seven filled with potentially solid positional fits, a tally that doesn’t include edge rusher Justin Houston (whose large salary makes him a cap risk, though he may return) and two younger players who need to prove themselves in Reggie Ragland (a classic 3-4 inside linebacker) and defensive end Tanoh Kpassagnon (who might not be explosive enough to be a “rush” end or stout enough to play the “power” side).

That leaves only strong-side linebacker as a position needing immediate attention, and considering the Chiefs possess four top-100 picks in this year’s draft and enough cap space to make some free-agent additions, it’s safe to say the reinforcements Spagnuolo needs to make the most of the 2019 defense are likely on the way.

So yes, there will be pressure on the Chiefs’ new defensive coordinator, someone who is potentially staring at his last opportunity to coordinate an NFL defense. After sitting out this past season — a trip to the coaching wilderness most coaches would rather avoid — if Spagnuolo fails to build a unit good enough to help Mahomes reach the Super Bowl, it will be hard to earn another gig like this.

Given his 20-plus years in the NFL, there’s no chance Spagnuolo doesn’t know that. And Reid, whose Hall of Fame candidacy will likely come down to whether he can build a defense good enough to win that elusive Super Bowl title as a head coach, is betting on it.

dlphg9 01-25-2019 10:33 AM

BleedingRed taught me that it isnt considered cheating if you let your dog lick peanut butter off your nuts cuz its your dog.

dlphg9 01-25-2019 10:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 14071796)
I posted it last page....but I'll add it to the top of this page because I think it's a good article by Terez.

https://sports.yahoo.com/chiefs-andy...084228411.html

Anyway you can get an audio book of this? BleedingBlood cant read through all his tears

BleedingRed 01-25-2019 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dlphg9 (Post 14071797)
BleedingRed taught me that it isnt considered cheating if you let your dog lick peanut butter off your nuts cuz its your dog.

I can link 17 scientific studies that proves me right on this issue

BleedingRed 01-25-2019 10:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by In58men (Post 14071789)
BleedingRed taught me “In Pioli We Trust”

HAHA Impossible! I was only stalking this site back then!

-King- 01-25-2019 10:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 14071748)
Yes it is. And average defense is going to get owned by Brady just like our D was owned by Brady. We need a defense that can stand up and make key stops and hold a lead against playoff caliber teams and Tom Brady.

So an average defense would get raped by Tom Brady just like how our 31st ranked defense did? That literally makes no sense. How isn't going from 31st ranked defense to the 16th ranked defense a major improvement?

BleedingRed 01-25-2019 10:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14071821)
So an average defense would get raped by Tom Brady just like how our 31st ranked defense did? That literally makes no sense. How isn't going from 31st ranked defense to the 16th ranked defense a major improvement?

it would be IF it happened, TBD......

-King- 01-25-2019 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14071829)
it would be IF it happened, TBD......

Sure. But IF it happens, we're the best team in the NFL and it's not even close really.

philfree 01-25-2019 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14071821)
So an average defense would get raped by Tom Brady just like how our 31st ranked defense did? That literally makes no sense. How isn't going from 31st ranked defense to the 16th ranked defense a major improvement?


Yes. It makes no sense to think that an average D is good enough to stop Brady with the game on the line.

The Franchise 01-25-2019 11:00 AM

You don't need a defense to completely shut down Brady. You need a defense that can stop him 2-4 times a game and allow your offense to get and hold the lead.

staylor26 01-25-2019 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 14071871)
Yes. It makes no sense to think that an average D is good enough to stop Brady with the game on the line.

A better defense gets another stop or two at some point in the game which makes it irrelevant whether they would’ve been able to on the last series.

O.city 01-25-2019 11:02 AM

Just build a good defense. Not one that we hope is just good enough, just a ****ing good solid d

staylor26 01-25-2019 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14071890)
Just build a good defense. Not one that we hope is just good enough, just a ****ing good solid d

That’s obviously the goal, but it’s going to be difficult to make it “good” in his first year.

Maybe it will be by playoff time though.

RunKC 01-25-2019 11:05 AM

All I can say is thank ****ing god Sutton’s package defense is gone.

2 DL, Houston, Ford and only Hitchens with a “money backer”.

And people wonder why we got ran on?!

-King- 01-25-2019 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 14071871)
Yes. It makes no sense to think that an average D is good enough to stop Brady with the game on the line.

If Ford lines back 5 inches, we win the game only allowing 24 points and forcing Brady into 3 interceptions.

That's the difference of a player just lining up 5 inches back. Just that small one change. But yet you think if a major change like the defense going from 31st to 16th wouldn't make a difference in performance?

O.city 01-25-2019 11:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14071900)
That’s obviously the goal, but it’s going to be difficult to make it “good” in his first year.

Maybe it will be by playoff time though.

If it’s taking this long then the front office needs some changes

staylor26 01-25-2019 11:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14071919)
If it’s taking this long then the front office needs some changes

So you expect a good defense week 1?

Sorry, but you’re likely to be disappointed if these are your expectations.

The Franchise 01-25-2019 11:11 AM

An average defense in year one for this defense would be a ****ing win.

O.city 01-25-2019 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14071925)
So you expect a good defense week 1?

Sorry, but you’re likely to be disappointed if these are your expectations.

Why not?

They’ve got the draft and the whole offseason

philfree 01-25-2019 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14071888)
A better defense gets another stop or two at some point in the game which makes it irrelevant whether they would’ve been able to on the last series.

In theory but these games all come down to the end and an average D isn't going to be good enough to stop a guy like Brady at the end of the big game. I guess you have to define average too. Average at what? Yards, points, red zone.

saphojunkie 01-25-2019 11:17 AM

People don't realize how historically bad our defense was.

staylor26 01-25-2019 11:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14071933)
Why not?

They’ve got the draft and the whole offseason

If they’re even average week 1 that’s a huge improvement.

Like I said, yea they should be good come playoff time, but I don’t expect it right away.

philfree 01-25-2019 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14071905)
If Ford lines back 5 inches, we win the game only allowing 24 points and forcing Brady into 3 interceptions.

That's the difference of a player just lining up 5 inches back. Just that small one change. But yet you think if a major change like the defense going from 31st to 16th wouldn't make a difference in performance?

It's a game of inches. Good Ds control the inches when it counts the most. Rankings? 16h ranked? I think I'd set my bar higher in an attempt to win it all.

RaidersOftheCellar 01-25-2019 11:23 AM

So, Spagnuolo inherited a poor defense in 07 and immediately made it good. And it continued to be good the next season. Then, he inherited a poor defense in NO and turned it into the worst D in the league with a bullet. Next, he inherits a bad NYG defense and again turns it into the worst in the league. But the following year he got it into the top 10. Then back down to 31.

What does this all mean?

Is he a good defensive mind who had terrible personnel at times? Or is a mediocre coach who needs great players to produce?

mcaj22 01-25-2019 11:23 AM

Don't expect a good defense but I expect a defense that at least can stop a couple 3rd and longs from being converted throughout a game.

That's how low the bar is set right now. Stop one 3rd and long conversion and the Chiefs win.

-King- 01-25-2019 11:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 14071955)
It's a game of inches. Good Ds control the inches when it counts the most. Rankings? 16h ranked? I think I'd set my bar higher in an attempt to win it all.

So you think we need a top 10 defense to win it all? Wasn't the point if having a franchise QB that we don't need to be perfect in all the other areas of the team?

Name a better team than the chiefs if we have a 16th ranked defense instead of the 31st.

O.city 01-25-2019 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14071950)
If they’re even average week 1 that’s a huge improvement.

Like I said, yea they should be good come playoff time, but I don’t expect it right away.

I would imagine they’re going to pour a lot of resources into the d

If they do that I expect it to be good

staylor26 01-25-2019 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar (Post 14071960)
So, Spagnuolo inherited a poor defense in 07 and immediately made it good. And it continued to be good the next season. Then, he inherited a poor defense in NO and turned it into the worst D in the league with a bullet. Next, he inherits a bad NYG defense and again turns it into the worst in the league. But the following year he got it into the top 10. Then back down to 31.

What does this all mean?

Is he a good defensive mind who had terrible personnel at times? Or is a mediocre coach who needs great players to produce?

It means talent >>>> coaching

But at least we know if we give him talent, he will get the most out of it.

RaidersOftheCellar 01-25-2019 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 14071944)
People don't realize how historically bad our defense was.

In what way? They were 24th in points allowed and also in points per play, I believe. Which is a more telling stat than yards/game. You can't compare their yards per game to teams with ball control offense.

To me, it's been the same sh*t the last three years. Not historically bad, but bad. Only difference is they got more turnovers in 2016, and last year they were on the field more due to a quick-score offense.

FringeNC 01-25-2019 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar (Post 14071983)
In what way? They were 24th in points allowed and also in points per play, I believe. Which is a more telling stat than yards/game. You can't compare their yards per game to teams with ball control offense.

To me, it's been the same sh*t the last three years. Not historically bad, but bad. Only difference is they got more turnovers in 2016, and last year they were on the field more due to a quick-score offense.

They were historically bad in first downs surrendered per game.

staylor26 01-25-2019 11:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14071974)
I would imagine they’re going to pour a lot of resources into the d

If they do that I expect it to be good

If they go out and get somebody like PP, Thomas, or Ramsey along with the draft being mostly D like we expect then yes I expect them to be good.

I’m not sure we get an elite secondary player though.

O.city 01-25-2019 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14071985)
If they go out and get somebody like PP, Thomas, or Ramsey along with the draft being mostly D like we expect then yes I expect them to be good.

I’m not sure we get an elite secondary player though.

I think they will. I’m not sure who but I’m guessing they go after someone.

I’ll say Earl Thomas will be high on their list.

I love Ramsey but I just don’t know what it will take

RaidersOftheCellar 01-25-2019 11:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14071974)
I would imagine they’re going to pour a lot of resources into the d

If they do that I expect it to be good

They're going to use virtually the entire draft on D and likely sign a few free agents. If they make the right moves, it could absolutely be good next year. Hell, I think it could be pretty good just by putting it in the hands of someone who knows how to adjust and get the most out of the talent.

Not sure if Spaggy is that guy.

RaidersOftheCellar 01-25-2019 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 14071984)
They were historically bad in first downs surrendered per game.

Well, again, stats like that have a lot to do with having an offense that consistently scores quickly.

It's not common to have an electric offense and a statistically great defense.

philfree 01-25-2019 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by -King- (Post 14071971)
So you think we need a top 10 defense to win it all? Wasn't the point if having a franchise QB that we don't need to be perfect in all the other areas of the team?

Name a better team than the chiefs if we have a 16th ranked defense instead of the 31st.

I think that the mentality of average is good enough is a losing mentality. We better try and build the best D we can and hope it's good enough to make the big stops at the big moments.

mcaj22 01-25-2019 11:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14071990)
I think they will. I’m not sure who but I’m guessing they go after someone.

I’ll say Earl Thomas will be high on their list.

I love Ramsey but I just don’t know what it will take

Dee Ford for Ramsey swap

The Franchise 01-25-2019 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 14072027)
Dee Ford for Ramsey swap

Why would the Jags make that trade?

JakeF 01-25-2019 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 14072017)
I think that the mentality of average is good enough is a losing mentality. We better try and build the best D we can and hope it's good enough to make the big stops at the big moments.

Absolutely. Shooting for 'just good enough' leaves you open to something going wrong ruining your season. During a football season, something will go wrong so you need to be better than average to cover for it.

BryanBusby 01-25-2019 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 14072030)
Why would the Jags make that trade?

They wouldn't and the idea that they would even think about it is funny

crayzkirk 01-25-2019 11:48 AM

Hoping for average? How about hoping for a defense that can force the other team to do something other than what it wants? Personally, I'd much rather see the defense die by the big play than by 1000 paper cuts. I believe the problem was the players and the system. The message was stale and many of the players looked like they were allergic to tackling.

Is the talent really that much worse than other teams?

O.city 01-25-2019 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mcaj22 (Post 14072027)
Dee Ford for Ramsey swap

Probably have to be ford and one of our 2nds atleast to get that done

BryanBusby 01-25-2019 11:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 14072054)
Probably have to be ford and one of our 2nds atleast to get that done

Smh

The Jaguars have too much money invested in the Defense as it is and are really lacking on Offense. How is Dee Ford gonna help balance that out?

O.city 01-25-2019 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BryanBusby (Post 14072058)
Smh

The Jaguars have too much money invested in the Defense as it is and are really lacking on Offense. How is Dee Ford gonna help balance that out?

They aren’t or won’t want Ford was just saying in general for that to work

O.city 01-25-2019 11:55 AM

The jags are probably gonna need to unload some of the defensive players so there’s a place you could get some value

BigRedChief 01-25-2019 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14071698)
The staylor Sutton/Nelson experience



















The above post was in 2017, BTW



Another 2017 gem





Called his shot on the 2018 D personnel above.



That's from November

Insert Owned gif

RaidersOftheCellar 01-25-2019 12:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by crayzkirk (Post 14072050)
Hoping for average? How about hoping for a defense that can force the other team to do something other than what it wants? Personally, I'd much rather see the defense die by the big play than by 1000 paper cuts. I believe the problem was the players and the system. The message was stale and many of the players looked like they were allergic to tackling.

Is the talent really that much worse than other teams?

I think the talent is well below Baltimore's, but comparable to the middle of the pack.

They're a couple players and an appropriate scheme away from top 10.

dlphg9 01-25-2019 12:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by philfree (Post 14072017)
I think that the mentality of average is good enough is a losing mentality. We better try and build the best D we can and hope it's good enough to make the big stops at the big moments.

How is that a losing mentality? All we need to win a SB is an average D, hell we were inches from being in the SB with a pretty terrible D. **** I hate when people feel like they need to say stupid shit like that "we better try and build the best D we can". No ****ing shit sherlock? You expecting the Chiefs to say "well we did just enough to be average on defense, so we decided to use this draft on
a few guys to help get you through security at the games and a couple of administrative assistants to get Andy's coffee, ever since Brett was promoted Andy's had to get his own"?

chiefzilla1501 01-25-2019 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RaidersOftheCellar (Post 14071960)
So, Spagnuolo inherited a poor defense in 07 and immediately made it good. And it continued to be good the next season. Then, he inherited a poor defense in NO and turned it into the worst D in the league with a bullet. Next, he inherits a bad NYG defense and again turns it into the worst in the league. But the following year he got it into the top 10. Then back down to 31.

What does this all mean?

Is he a good defensive mind who had terrible personnel at times? Or is a mediocre coach who needs great players to produce?

It could be that he's a Romeo guy. Terrible at managing players (too nice of a guy) but can do fine if a quality head coach keeps the locker room together. Can't blame him for the bountygate disaster in New Orleans. Don't think you can blame him for mcadoo losing the entire locker room in 2017. He seems to me like a good defensive mind, average scheme, good at coaching players but terrible at managing them.

BossChief 01-25-2019 12:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BleedingRed (Post 14071665)
I can concede things like that, but you have to look at the whole picture here. We are not going to switch from 3-4 to 4-3 in one year like nothing happened.

Yes. We are.

And we will improve because of simply that aspect...regardless of who coordinates the defense. I’m not a fan of the specific hire, but I definetely see how his style and the base defense are better fits for the talent on this team.

BossChief 01-25-2019 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 14071652)
I'm not. You're saying he had a $200m offseason as if they brought in a ton of players. He basically netted 2... Or 2.5 to be fair... Players to a 32 ranked defense. If we add 2 superstars and jump 30 spots id take that in a heartbeat.

JalenRamsey and Collins and a bunch of draft picks chosen to replace high priced stars in the next 2 seasons and LETS GOOOOO

RunKC 01-25-2019 12:55 PM

Why do people like Landon Collins? Dude had one good year and he can’t cover TE’s.

O.city 01-25-2019 01:00 PM

Yeah I’m not big on giving him big money

I’d rather sign Earl Thomas or Amos

saphojunkie 01-25-2019 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JakeF (Post 14072031)
Absolutely. Shooting for 'just good enough' leaves you open to something going wrong ruining your season. During a football season, something will go wrong so you need to be better than average to cover for it.

I highly doubt anyone in the organization is aiming for average.

saphojunkie 01-25-2019 01:05 PM

Also, this team needs to let Dee Ford walk. If you really want to spend on an edge defender, there are younger, more accomplished, more well-rounded pass rushers.

And who would like to see KC bring back David Irving?

Sassy Squatch 01-25-2019 01:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RunKC (Post 14072224)
Why do people like Landon Collins? Dude had one good year and he can’t cover TE’s.

Just acknowledging the very real chance that Spagnuolo would want him on this defense.

chiefzilla1501 01-25-2019 01:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 14072217)
JalenRamsey and Collins and a bunch of draft picks chosen to replace high priced stars in the next 2 seasons and LETS GOOOOO

Ramsey is budding up with tyreek. Maybe he's doing some recruiting for us. One things for damn sure... Regardless of how anyone feels about Xs and O's he can flat out coach DB's. Groomed lito sheppard, Landon Collins, Jimmy Smith, Aaron Ross, Corey Webster when they were just pups. Our secondary is going to be really good at some point.

Titty Meat 01-25-2019 01:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 14072264)
Ramsey is budding up with tyreek. Maybe he's doing some recruiting for us. One things for damn sure... Regardless of how anyone feels about Xs and O's he can flat out coach DB's. Groomed lito sheppard, Landon Collins, Jimmy Smith, Aaron Ross, Corey Webster when they were just pups. Our secondary is going to be really good at some point.

I hope he fires Thomas.

Sassy Squatch 01-25-2019 01:15 PM

The entire defensive side of the ball (sans Mike Smith) needs to be fired. Make Britt Reid into an assistant if you absolutely have to. Andy Heck should also be shown the door.

chiefzilla1501 01-25-2019 01:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Titty Meat (Post 14072271)
I hope he fires Thomas.

Yeah, I could see him firing Thomas but keeping Harris (he coached Harris in Philly). This is the one positions group that doesn't matter to me, because no matter what, I think Spagnuolo will trump any coaching we have. We'll be good at DB no matter who's the official DBs assistant.

Mecca 01-25-2019 01:23 PM

Thomas retired the day Sutton was fired, did you all miss that?

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-25-2019 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14072294)
Thomas retired the day Sutton was fired, did you all miss that?

Link?

Sassy Squatch 01-25-2019 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14072294)
Thomas retired the day Sutton was fired, did you all miss that?

Source? I've seen this posted, but there's never been a link.

ShowtimeSBMVP 01-25-2019 01:25 PM

https://www.chiefs.com/team/coaches-roster/

They updated the DC and Thomas is still on coaching staff

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-25-2019 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by staylor26 (Post 14071733)
Funny how Hamas went that far back and still couldn’t find me saying Nelson was “good” or that Gase was a “QB guru”. You know, the two things I challenged him on in the post he quoted.

LMAO

Because I was making a broader point. You're a homer. Always have been. You'll view these personnel decisions through a homer's lens because you always pump sunshine on these mediocre to bad players and coaches first.

You've said that you never overrate Chiefs players, which is just absolute bullshit. Looking at the secondary alone, one can find examples of Nelson, Gaines, and Russell, among others. You were probably one of the last holdouts on Mike Catapano for ****'s sake.

You talk now about how bad Sutton was once Spagnuolo is on board, but in November you were making fun of people for stating that the defense was bad. You claimed that Sutton could scheme his way out of problems, then blamed him for an inability to adjust only after he was fired.

Regarding Nelson: You've been routinely overrating him for years because you're unable to admit that you're wrong about him. You crowed about him being a nickel corner (Narrator: he wasn't), talked about him having good/solid years (he didn't).

Just admit that you see everything through rose-colored glasses and it would be a hell of a lot easier to respect you.

Regarding Gase: you claimed that the got the most out of Tannehill (false, go look at his stats) and that Cutler had the best QBR of his career under Gase (which was also false, it was never higher than his fifth best).

Hammock Parties 01-25-2019 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Showtime (Post 14072303)
https://www.chiefs.com/team/coaches-roster/

They updated the DC and Thomas is still on coaching staff

Marty said he was retiring.

It'll probably take a few days.

BryanBusby 01-25-2019 02:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Showtime (Post 14072303)
https://www.chiefs.com/team/coaches-roster/

They updated the DC and Thomas is still on coaching staff

Thomas is the only coach on that page where you can't click to get a bio or at least some **** you blurb. Pretty telling.

wheeler08 01-25-2019 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 14072280)
The entire defensive side of the ball (sans Mike Smith) needs to be fired. Make Britt Reid into an assistant if you absolutely have to. Andy Heck should also be shown the door.

In relation to Heck, has the colts fired offensive line coach gotten a job anywhere yet? Biggest shock in offseason so far to me. They say he was an asshole but it was the most improved O line in history. Quinton Nelson took up for him after he was fired and he’s their best player.

dlphg9 01-25-2019 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14072393)
Because I was making a broader point. You're a homer. Always have been. You'll view these personnel decisions through a homer's lens because you always pump sunshine on these mediocre to bad players and coaches first.

You've said that you never overrate Chiefs players, which is just absolute bullshit. Looking at the secondary alone, one can find examples of Nelson, Gaines, and Russell, among others. You were probably one of the last holdouts on Mike Catapano for ****'s sake.

You talk now about how bad Sutton was once Spagnuolo is on board, but in November you were making fun of people for stating that the defense was bad. You claimed that Sutton could scheme his way out of problems, then blamed him for an inability to adjust only after he was fired.

Regarding Nelson: You've been routinely overrating him for years because you're unable to admit that you're wrong about him. You crowed about him being a nickel corner (Narrator: he wasn't), talked about him having good/solid years (he didn't).

Just admit that you see everything through rose-colored glasses and it would be a hell of a lot easier to respect you.

Regarding Gase: you claimed that the got the most out of Tannehill (false, go look at his stats) and that Cutler had the best QBR of his career under Gase (which was also false, it was never higher than his fifth best).

Staylor was full on Alex homer wasnt he? Like on the same level as Sandy if I can recall correctly.

Nothing wrong with being a homer Staylor. Just admit you thought Bartee and Warfield was one of the best CB duos youve ever watched play and all will be forgiven.

Sassy Squatch 01-25-2019 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 14072419)
Marty said he was retiring.

It'll probably take a few days.

Marty also said Sutton was retiring. He was relieved of his duties, a nicer way of saying he was fired.

Mecca 01-25-2019 02:34 PM

PFF thinks Steven Nelson is good...I'm not sure why.

staylor26 01-25-2019 02:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 14072393)
Because I was making a broader point. You're a homer. Always have been. You'll view these personnel decisions through a homer's lens because you always pump sunshine on these mediocre to bad players and coaches first.

You've said that you never overrate Chiefs players, which is just absolute bullshit. Looking at the secondary alone, one can find examples of Nelson, Gaines, and Russell, among others. You were probably one of the last holdouts on Mike Catapano for ****'s sake.

You talk now about how bad Sutton was once Spagnuolo is on board, but in November you were making fun of people for stating that the defense was bad. You claimed that Sutton could scheme his way out of problems, then blamed him for an inability to adjust only after he was fired.

Regarding Nelson: You've been routinely overrating him for years because you're unable to admit that you're wrong about him. You crowed about him being a nickel corner (Narrator: he wasn't), talked about him having good/solid years (he didn't).

Just admit that you see everything through rose-colored glasses and it would be a hell of a lot easier to respect you.

Regarding Gase: you claimed that the got the most out of Tannehill (false, go look at his stats) and that Cutler had the best QBR of his career under Gase (which was also false, it was never higher than his fifth best).

I’m such a homer that I picked the Chargers to win the division this year.

I never once said Sutton was great or anything. I liked him because he did a good job early on, but after a second year of this shit it’s hard to defend. I’ve already said I still believe the problem was talent for the most part. I don’t believe I’ve even commented much on his adjustments the past couple years outside of the game because it was so blatantly bad. All I’ve said is that after another playoff loss like we had, he had to go. His defense has grown stale and it’s clearly time for a change.

I think Spags is an upgrade, and he clearly is. I didn’t say it was tremendous and I didn’t say he alone will fix everything. We need talent just as much as we would’ve if Sutton wasn’t fired or we hired somebody else.

If I’m guilty of anything when it comes to players, it’s being bullish on prospects I liked coming out because I don’t like to be wrong. I take a lot of pride in my eye for talent. Gaines, Nelson, Catapano, etc. are guys I liked as prospects. The fact that they were on my team might add a little to that, but that’s the context you’re missing about me.

You only see what I’m wrong about though. Since you like digging up old shit go back and look at how much I pimped guys like Chris Jones, Kareem Hunt, Travis Kelce before the draft. I was one of the few left defending Ford till this year because I liked him also.

When it comes to evaluating talent we all swing and miss, though I’d argue that Nelson for a 3rd rounder is hardly a huge miss with the second contract he’s about to get. You guys can laugh all you want, but he still wasn’t that bad at all this year when you look at how much he was targeted, completion % against, and QBR. The guy was playing on an island and basically our #1 corner. We asked way too much of him. If we had a legit #1 he would’ve been a nice corner to have on a rookie deal this year.

Do I almost always lean on the optimistic side of all things Chiefs? Yes absolutely, but that’s just a matter of philosophy more than anything. I can’t believe how many people spend all this time talking about a team that makes them miserable. I’ve been through so much heartbreak as a fan in general that I’m not scared to be disappointed.

As for Gase, you’re being completely moronic and completely ignoring context like you continuously do when it doesn’t fit your argument. Tannehill never once played more than 13 games under Gase (he was out 50 ****ing % of the time dude seriously), he missed an entire season one year, and it’s not fair to make those comparisons based on stats that really aren’t THAT far off. The bottom line is the one year Tannehill at least played 13 the Dolphins were 10-6 and made the playoffs despite being in Brady/BB’s division.

All of this context has already been laid out for you but you won’t acknowledge that it’s legitimate because you’re an unreasonable person. What have I said that unreasonable about Sutton, Nelson, Spags, anybody? You know what’s unreasonable? Calling Spags an “atrocious” hire then naming John Pagano as the first experienced guy on your list. Stupid ****.

Chris Meck 01-25-2019 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14072496)
PFF thinks Steven Nelson is good...I'm not sure why.

Nelson's such a frustrating player to watch. Usually in decent position but with the worst possible ball awareness. Thus, PI, and toast.

I really don't want to see him again next year. Unless he's in a different uniform.

Mecca 01-25-2019 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 14072516)
Nelson's such a frustrating player to watch. Usually in decent position but with the worst possible ball awareness. Thus, PI, and toast.

I really don't want to see him again next year. Unless he's in a different uniform.

Before the Pats game they were talking about him on PFF as one of the better CB's in the league because his % against is like 53 which is really good in todays game.

And I'm just like...I watch this guy, he's not good.

Chris Meck 01-25-2019 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14072529)
Before the Pats game they were talking about him on PFF as one of the better CB's in the league because his % against is like 53 which is really good in todays game.

And I'm just like...I watch this guy, he's not good.


yeah man. I don't know how those stats are possible. I mean, he does NOT pass the eye test. Somehow they're not factoring in all his PI calls or something.

Sassy Squatch 01-25-2019 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 14072535)
yeah man. I don't know how those stats are possible. I mean, he does NOT pass the eye test. Somehow they're not factoring in all his PI calls or something.

That's what it has to be.

pugsnotdrugs19 01-25-2019 02:45 PM

Ideally, we need Houston to knock off $5M+ in cap charges this year, and Berry doing the same would be nice... something to essentially pay for Ford’s tag if that’s the direction they want to go.

**** this is tough. The Ford tag or lack thereof is critical to this offseason.

Mecca 01-25-2019 02:49 PM

Berry take a paycut, hold on while I have to catch my breath from laughing so hard.

pugsnotdrugs19 01-25-2019 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 14072556)
Berry take a paycut, hold on while I have to catch my breath from laughing so hard.

I don’t think he’s going to, but he ****ing should after this past season.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.