![]() |
1 Attachment(s)
Body descriptors tend to be really bad. I propose that all online dating, game design, and other sites go with my simple four-dimensional system.
Enter one of five fat levels: 1 - Little or no fat at all. 2 - No excess fat. 3 - Minor excess fat. 4 - Notable excess fat. 5 - Significant excess fat. Enter one of five muscle levels: 1 - Very little muscle, no definition. 2 - Minor muscle with no definition. 3 - Moderate muscle with minor definition. 4 - Large muscle with notable definition. 5 - Very large muscle with significant definition. Enter one of five frame types: 1 - Very narrow. 2 - Somewhat narrow. 3 - Moderate. 4 - Moderately broad. 5 - Very broad. Enter one of five heights: 1 - Significantly shorter than average 2 - Somewhat shorter than average 3 - Roughly average 4 - Somewhat taller than average 5 - Significantly taller than average You can then plot the measures on a radar plot and understand exactly how the person is built. I've provided three examples below. |
Quote:
... I think? |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Men win points for honesty. |
Quote:
Secret internet fatty. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Pretty awesome the girls didn't just up and leave like those guys did though. |
You've really gotta watch the "fat chick" angles too, I'm learning. Nothing worse than thinking you're meeting up with a hot chick and then finding out she's a true SIF
Posted via Mobile Device |
You go hoggin DP?
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
When I saw this thread title yesterday, at first I thought it was a body type someone wanted for our draft picks.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:24 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.