ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Alex Smith = Playmaker (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=280264)

Rams Fan 01-04-2014 08:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10342059)
Would you take 2 runs for 5 yards over 1 run for 0 yards and a fumble for 7 points to the other team? I'd REALLY like to know.

I'd rather have 2 runs for 5 yards obviously. But I'd trust Trent Richardson-even if he is a bust- in the 4th quarter of a playoff game over Cyrus Gray.

Imon Yourside 01-04-2014 08:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10342059)
Would you take 2 runs for 5 yards over 1 run for 0 yards and a fumble for 7 points to the other team? I'd REALLY like to know.

It's not like we lost the 2nd guy in the race for MVP and our QB stepped up bigtime to get us 44 points..nope not at all..didn't happen.

Imon Yourside 01-04-2014 08:35 PM

I remember a game from 2004..where we were asking for just 1 punt...well I think we got exactly one punt....we should set our standards higher. just sayin'

Easy 6 01-04-2014 08:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10341948)
Our offensive line wasn't even particularly good today.

Alex was under a ton of pressure.

If you weren't impressed by this you have unrealistic standards for QB play.

Well which ****ing group are you in, exactly?

Did he play good enough to win it or not... no equivocating necessary, a yes or no will suffice.

Hammock Parties 01-04-2014 08:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10342131)
Well which ****ing group are you in, exactly?

Did he play good enough to win it or not... no equivocating necessary, a yes or no will suffice.

Do you see any negative posts from me tonight?

BigMeatballDave 01-04-2014 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10342140)
Do you see any negative posts from me tonight?

You nailed it on Sutton.

laughsatyou907 01-04-2014 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10342140)
Do you see any negative posts from me tonight?

Damage control. You have looked like a fool all season long. You are a moron, but even morons know how to capitalize on a situation.

Hammock Parties 01-04-2014 08:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 10342161)
You nailed it on Sutton.

Thank you.

Sean Smith was also a ghost today.

Mav 01-04-2014 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by laughsatyou907 (Post 10342163)
Damage control. You have looked like a fool all season long. You are a moron, but even morons know how to capitalize on a situation.

No. He had no reason to take this position. Even I value this as sincere.

SAUTO 01-04-2014 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10342140)
Do you see any negative posts from me tonight?

it was a yes or no ****ing question.


just ****ing answer it dude

laughsatyou907 01-04-2014 08:42 PM

Passing Cmp/Att Yds Ints Tds
A.Luck 29/45 443 3 4
A.Smith 30/46 378 0 4

cdcox 01-04-2014 08:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by scott free (Post 10341832)
ITS. ON. THE DEFENSE.

You snotnosed twentysomething... 44 points but the offense lagged here and there... SO ****ING WHAT.

I'm looking at you cdcox, you're a good man... but blaming this on the offense is straight up bullshit, 44 points! In the playoffs!... if you're blaming Smith, you're just being bullish and obtuse about your original thoughts.

I'm not blaming Smith or the offense for this loss. They had a great game and put us in position to win. The loss is on the defense.

The Colt's defense did not play well enough to win either. But they won because their offense was productive enough to overcome that.

I do lament that we scored 6 points off of the last 6 drives of the game, including one that started in their territory with an interception. I lament that many other teams would have taken more advantage of those 6 drives and would be celebrating now. We didn't have to be helpless while our defense melted down.

jd1020 01-04-2014 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 10342188)
it was a yes or no ****ing question.


just ****ing answer it dude

Why should he have to answer a question from a person who can't comprehend what he is reading?

Hammock Parties 01-04-2014 08:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 10342188)
it was a yes or no ****ing question.


just ****ing answer it dude

The answer is clearly yes.

SAUTO 01-04-2014 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jd1020 (Post 10342203)
Why should he have to answer a question from a person who can't comprehend what he is reading?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pam Oliver's Forehead (Post 10342208)
The answer is clearly yes.

at least clay understood...


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.