OK, break it down by start.

Priest: 136 total yards per start. 1.1 TD per start.

Davis: 115.4 yards per start. .844 TD per start.

You lose.

lol...denial much?...

all it takes is 15 seconds of reading to see we havent come close to running out of arguments in favor of TD... the reasons are countless... exactly how many times has holmes been nominated as a semi finalist for the HOF?...

and i guess the butt hurt thing depends on where you're sitting... becuz all i am reading are butt hurt chiefs fans trying to grasp at haterade reasons TD isnt that good... a lot more disses at TD on this thread than disses from Broncos fans towards Holmes...

in large, we arent dissing Holmes or discrediting him too much, instead we're just reminding of TDs dominance...

sorry, but the ones "butt hurt" are you chierfs fans...

Terrel Davis was autographing bottles of his BBQ in my Safeway the other day. That was weird.

Priest has not been nominated for the HOF because he retired in 2007 you ****ing moron.

lol...we can spin stats however we want...

i think its hilarious how you feel you get to be the determiner of what stat wins and loses this argument...

if you wish i can show you stats that show that drew bledsoe was better than joe montana... shall i?...

He maybe considered,but when I say he has no chance that means he aint getting in. Players are considered for the HOF all the time some of them will never get in= no chance= Terrell Davis. Does it make since now,genius?

ahh, that's sweet. A kc fan who cherry picks his stats to prove a point.

Davis was good, there's no denying it. But he wasn't HOF good. Had he managed to make it through another two or three productive seasons, we wouldn't be having this discussion. But he didn't, so he's not.

Next up, Knowmo tells us why Jim Leonahrd will make everyone forget about Brian Dawkins.

Ok moron, let me essssplain this to you so you can "grasp the idea." If a player is "considered" for the HoF it means he "has a chance" to get into the HoF.

but carry on, I know you have a hard time understanding basic logic.

yea lets see how much that will matter when he is elgible...:)

Did you tell him Priest Holmes was going to the Hall before he was? You should have, just to see these tards come running out of the cookie aisle to tell you what a moran you are, and to lick his feet.

I'm not trying to discredit Davis... I think his two great seasons were two of the greatest seasons any RB has ever had... but is that enough to get in the HOF?

Curtis Martin just got in without winning a Super Bowl. Career achievement surely measures into it. Certainly Priest didn't get as many playoff games... but TD wouldn't have had very many playoff games either if his defense never forced a punt. Blaming him for that is completely flawed. Especially in that one game he had a better statistical performance than Davis ever did in any playoff game.

Also, Priest is at least among the greats statistically in scoring.

E. Smith
Tomlinson
M. Allen
Faulk
Jim Brown
Payton
Riggins
Alexander
B. Sanders
F. Harris
C. Martin
E. Dickerson

Those are the RB's ahead of Priest in TDs. He's in the top 25 all time in TDs. And depending on what Shaun Alexander does... all of those guys are or will be in the HOF. And if you include WR's, the same thing will eventually likely be true. Depends on Cris Carter and Tim Brown.

There's a legit chance Priest might end up the only guy currently in the top 25 TD's all-time to not be in the HOF. Terrell Davis is 109th all time in TDs. But he does have the two rings. So you're pretty much putting him in the HOF for two seasons. It's an interesting debate.

Priest averaged more yards per start, more TDs per start, playing with less talented players at the skill positions, at QB, and on defense. Chiefs' line was probably slightly better than Denver's.

Bottom line, the difference between the two players is negligible.

It's a bit like comparing Montana and Marino. They were both great QBs, one won SBs because he played on better teams.

Terrell was the G.O.A.T. I get it now,I have finally seen the light! He has been "considered" 4 times now! He's never got in,but he's been "CONSIDERED"! And being "considered" is as good as being in there! /end sarcasm.

By kc logic, the bolded part should discredit Priest, right? I mean c'mon, you can't have it both ways.