ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs Stafford or Sanchez? (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=200332)

Chiefnj2 01-14-2009 08:34 PM

Sanchez will be on the bench his entire first year.

Chiefnj2 01-14-2009 08:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5391604)
Sanchez has faced a lot of pressure and taken a lot of hits.

He isn't surrounded by the talent that Bradford was, and he plays in a pro set.

Sanchez hasn't faced all that much pressure. How many games was USC down where Sanchez had to bring them back?

08/30/08 @ Virginia W 52-7
09/13/08 9 Ohio St. W 35-3
09/25/08 @ 18 Oregon St. L 21-27
10/04/08 10 Oregon W 44-10
10/11/08 Arizona St. W 28-0
10/18/08 @ Washington St. W 69-0
10/25/08 @ Arizona W 17-10
11/01/08 Washington W 56-0
11/08/08 California W 17-3
11/15/08 @ Stanford W 45-23
11/29/08 Notre Dame W 38-3
12/06/08 @ UCLA W 28-7
01/01/09 + 8 Penn St. W 38-24

He's a hell of a prospect, but almost all of the Bradford criticisms apply to Sanchez. He just doesn't have enough experience to justify a top 10 pick.

LOCOChief 01-14-2009 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mecca (Post 5391385)
He knows that he will be picked apart in workouts and tape study....


Not hardly. Your saying he's holding out because he fears the criticism? But your joking right?

If SB was on the list, he'd be my pick, but I'd be curious to see how either Sanchez or Stafford would develope. I'll bet the three will play quite a few NFL games when all said and done.

ChiefsCountry 01-14-2009 09:42 PM

When is Frankie going to come in and say they are both 4th round picks.

Mr. Arrowhead 01-14-2009 09:47 PM

anybody knows what Sanchez projects as

FringeNC 01-14-2009 09:49 PM

I'll go on record now as saying Pioli will pick neither of them, and trade down.

Sweet Daddy Hate 01-14-2009 09:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FringeNC (Post 5391900)
I'll go on record now as saying Pioli will pick neither of them, and trade down.

"Meh" on you! Meh I say!:D

DrRyan 01-14-2009 10:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ChiefsCountry (Post 5391469)
Elway and Favre would like to disagree with that.

So now CP posters are already comparing Stafford to Elway and Favre because he has a strong arm? Premature much?

Ultra Peanut 01-14-2009 10:08 PM

Sanchez is like Lex Luger's nickname, but a Stafford is fine also.

rolstrol 01-14-2009 10:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 5391742)
Sanchez will be on the bench his entire first year.

Stafford will likely be on the bench as well.

Gravedigger 01-14-2009 10:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Arrowhead (Post 5391894)
anybody knows what Sanchez projects as

On Scout's Inc 32 Sanchez is at 11 and Stafford is 12 or 13. I hate to say it but Pioli does like to trade down, if Sanchez or Stafford is sitting there at 3 and some team wants to jump up badly enough I think he might pull the trigger mostly because I don't know how he will evaluate the two of them, but I know he doesn't like high picks. The highest he ever drafted was 6th with Richard Seymour.

SAUTO 01-14-2009 10:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5391444)
In Stafford's case, I think it is just a question of maturity.

He's got a strong arm, and like many young QBs with a strong, feels that he can make plays that aren't there.

Some kids grow out of that, and Stafford seems to have a good head on his shoulders, so I think he will learn.

some dont though(see brett farve)

milkman 01-14-2009 10:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 5392079)
some dont though(see brett farve)

Yeah, I said Favre is a dumbass.

SAUTO 01-14-2009 10:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by milkman (Post 5392091)
Yeah, I said Favre is a dumbass.

just saw that post sorry.

KChiefs1 01-14-2009 10:55 PM

I voted Sanchez because USC has produced better NFL QB's than Georgia.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.