ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs *****The George Karlaftis Thread***** (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=343615)

The Franchise 10-20-2022 11:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16543406)
Here you go, O. I think this article was written specifically for you.

https://heavy.com/sports/kansas-city...proposed-trade

A 2nd and 3rd for a 33 year old DE? No ****ing thanks.

Chris Meck 10-20-2022 11:52 AM

all of these threads just make me really, REALLY glad that none of you are in charge of The Kansas City Chiefs.

zigbazah 10-20-2022 02:27 PM

jury is still out on george. i wasn't thrilled with the pick, but the tools are there to be sharpened. has has as many pressures as any other rookie, he just needs the end product.

kcclone 10-20-2022 02:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by zigbazah (Post 16543825)
jury is still out on george. i wasn't thrilled with the pick, but the tools are there to be sharpened. has has as many pressures as any other rookie, he just needs the end product.

It doesn’t help Karlaftis that he has Frank Clark on the opposite side.

I think Karlaftis will be a very solid player. Maybe not great, but good. Hopefully we can find a counterpart next year in the draft or free agency.

Frank is worthless 90% of the time.

JPH83 10-20-2022 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 16543263)
Drake Jackson has 4 sacks and 8 pressures in fewer than half the number of snaps as Karlaftis.

And that's not a knock on Karlaftis as much as it demonstrates the need for genuine depth and complementary skill-sets on the line.

It galls the absolute shit out of me that Veach and company thought they could get away with adding 1 player to a DL that was obviously not good last season.

Yep. There were options to double-dip at DT as well as DE. I mean I'm entirely fine building from the back but just baffling that so many picks went that way after he indentified DL as a need.

htismaqe 10-20-2022 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JPH83 (Post 16543941)
Yep. There were options to double-dip at DT as well as DE. I mean I'm entirely fine building from the back but just baffling that so many picks went that way after he indentified DL as a need.

Because he identified the backfield as being a need too and he saw players there that fit the defense?

I mean, I highly doubt he said **** it and just drafted whoever he felt like, consequences be damned.

JPH83 10-20-2022 03:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Meck (Post 16543500)
all of these threads just make me really, REALLY glad that none of you are in charge of The Kansas City Chiefs.

I mean about 85% of CP sees Clark is s**t, so hell I'd give them a decent shot at improving this DL.

JPH83 10-20-2022 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by htismaqe (Post 16543943)
Because he identified the backfield as being a need too and he saw players there that fit the defense?

I mean, I highly doubt he said **** it and just drafted whoever he felt like, consequences be damned.

This is in the whole 10D chess category people convinced themselves of suggesting Veach had publicly identified DL as a need, but secretly it was a cunning plan to throw people off while he built an elite secondary.

Sure, he had a plan, it probably shifted as it met reality, as it should, and we ended up with Dunlap and Karlaftis, which is patently not enough.

TEX 10-20-2022 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Dawg (Post 16543438)
We had 2 1 picks and have gotten jack shit from either of them this far. That sucks.

Yes it does. We have had better contributions from our 7th rounders thus far.

Sassy Squatch 10-20-2022 03:37 PM

I'm still baffled why Cook was such a priority in the second. We already had 2 starting caliber S on the roster, and if they've already given up on Thornhill there's a long ****ing line of guys more deserving of that treatment on the roster.

Hammock Parties 10-20-2022 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16543955)
I'm still baffled why Cook was such a priority in the second. We already had 2 starting caliber S on the roster, and if they've already given up on Thornhill there's a long ****ing line of guys more deserving of that treatment on the roster.

WORST franchise in PRO SPORTS

The Franchise 10-20-2022 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16543955)
I'm still baffled why Cook was such a priority in the second. We already had 2 starting caliber S on the roster, and if they've already given up on Thornhill there's a long ****ing line of guys more deserving of that treatment on the roster.

Because Spags likes to play 3 safeties. And we all saw what happens when that 3rd safety is complete shit.

Sassy Squatch 10-20-2022 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hammock Parties (Post 16543956)
WORST franchise in PRO SPORTS

Oof. Grindr date bailed on you recently? You've been incredibly horny for attention these past couple days.

RunKC 10-20-2022 03:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Superturtle (Post 16543955)
I'm still baffled why Cook was such a priority in the second. We already had 2 starting caliber S on the roster, and if they've already given up on Thornhill there's a long ****ing line of guys more deserving of that treatment on the roster.

Spags system runs 3 safeties. This was our 3rd safety last year. I think this is pretty self explanatory

https://youtu.be/PINgtQpxik4

Sassy Squatch 10-20-2022 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Franchise (Post 16543958)
Because Spags likes to play 3 safeties. And we all saw what happens when that 3rd safety is complete shit.

Taking a quick glance through our snap counts and I'm not seeing this system where 3 safeties are playing even close to a majority of the time. We play our nickel corner a lot more.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.