![]() |
Quote:
Now lots of you are like, of course they beat the ravens duhh. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
What the **** is wrong with you? |
Quote:
That game was far more about how badly Baltimore shit themselves than the Titans being great. |
Quote:
So correcting you on your analysis gets under your skin, eh? I guess i gave you that positive rep for no reason. You ARE thin skinned afterall... |
Quote:
Quote:
I mean, the 3 of us had legit convos about this leading up to the game, but i guess that never happened. Apparently. |
[QUOTE=Detoxing;14730162]
Quote:
There's absolutely no reason for you to act like this. Why is it so important to you to throw a tantrum about the fact that I was pretty early on the 'watch out for Tennessee train'? Why does that make so angry? Why do you feel the need to exaggerate and nitpick and try to bend things around? Why does the fact that I said they were legit MANY weeks ago seem like chest beating? The only thing I've been beating my chest about is THAT THE CHIEFS ARE GOING TO WIN THE WHOLE ****ING THING. I'M DRIVING THE BUS MOTHER****ER. That's the only chest beating I'm doing. You know why I like to point out the times I have been right? BECAUSE DIPSHITS LIKE YOU INSISTED I WAS A ****ING MORON. And then when I'm right, yeah, you bet your ass I'm going to point it out. Sorry that hurts your bleeding vagina. I was right. About Spags, about Clark, about Mahomes, about Bienemy, about Hardman, about Honey Badger, about Ward, about ****ing KPASS for ****'s sake, about DEE ****ING FORD, and yeah, I was pretty early on the watch out for Tennessee train. and if you get to be a **** and say I'm a moron, then I get to point out when I'm ****ing right. I don't have to be the ONLY ****ING PERSON ALIVE that agrees with my viewpoint. Still means I was right. For some reason that is really sand in your cooter. yeah, numbnuts, I understand Jones had outside contain. You also can watch him slow down, and stop, and not get over AFTER the ****ING HAND-OFF until he realizes that Henry is cutting right. His REACTION is SLOW. He was also coming off an injury, hadn't played outside much, but yeah, he was SLOW to make the adjustment AFTER THE ****ING HAND-OFF. Why are you so invested in trying to find a point to make? |
How about both of you just shut the **** up?
|
I wanna see the Chiefs and Reid learning his lesson, put the pedal down and don't let up until the 4th quarter whistle blows. We have the take no prisoners attitude and this is a mega blowout. I wanna see a repeat of the Texans game from down 24-0 from the start.
|
[QUOTE=Chris Meck;14730283]
Quote:
My god was i wrong about that.... But look, here you are....all pissy now because you can't debate like an adult. Get out of here, next. |
Quote:
Don't go soft on me now, Pest. |
Quote:
Then Jackson fires a bit high on a ball that A) Mahomes doesn't miss and B) Kelce doesn't drop, the ball gets intercepted, Tannehill strikes early and the script flipped. And Jackson had a couple of plays where the moment seemed too big for him - one of the 4th and 1 runs was a TERRIBLE run from him where he just stuttered behind the line before getting taken down. The other interception was a shit pass and then the god-awful strip-sack where he simply demonstrated ZERO pocket awareness. I guess I could've seen that coming, but I didn't. Bottom line is that I simply didn't see a scenario where a 1 score game more than midway through the 3rd quarter would yield a SIXTY DROPBACK DAY from Lamar Jackson. Kinda feel like Harbaugh just ****ed that up quite a bit and Lamar Jackson simply isn't equipped for the direction the game (inexplicably) took. So yeah, I'll say that I saw only a very narrow window for the Titans to win that game because I thought the matchup was rough for them. But I think this one is WORSE because even IF the Titans get a nice lead, that's simply going to push the Chiefs to do what they're best at and that's attack downfield. Get ahead of Baltimore and they have to fall back to what they're pretty lousy at. Get ahead of KC and you force them to do what they should probably be doing most of the time anyway. |
To think....this entire debate started because i said you talk about the Titans way too much.
Which is true, you do. |
Quote:
They had a great gameplan against the Ravens and executed it well. The Titans' run defense strength matches up well against the Ravens and kept them from turning drives into points. They deserve props for that; matchup also plays a part there. The Patriots are one of the worst red zone offenses in the NFL this year. Not much props deserved there. Again, the matchup helps the Titans here. Anyway, I went back and looked at all of your games since Tannehill became the full-time starter. In those 12 games (including playoffs), the Titans gave up TDs on 63 percent of red zone drives. For the year, the Titans gave up TDs on 63 percent of red zone drives (good for 28th in the NFL and second-worst among playoff teams). But teams that can throw the ball effectively have shredded the Titans in the red zone: Indy, New Orleans, Kansas City and Houston - 5 games featuring good QB play - scored red zone TDs 71 percent of the time. The last 3 regular season games the Titans played were against the Texans (trying), Saints, and Texans again (not trying). Those 3 teams went 8/11 on red zone possessions for TDs. So again: When does this second tale of the Titans becoming stingy in the red zone supposedly begin? Because it sure doesn't look like it's written. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:00 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.