ChiefsPlanet - Chiefs Is it time to start Foles over Smith?

Dane, Patriots had a way more injuries then we did last year. They were never fully healthy yet they trucked us.

http://www.patspulpit.com/2016/2/10/...d-reserve-list

oaklandhater

11-06-2016 07:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannybcaitlyn (Post 12534698)

Dane, Patriots had a way more injuries then we did last year. They were never fully healthy yet they trucked us.

Shhh Dane can't Handel the truth let him live in his fantasy world

TigeRRUppeRRcut

11-06-2016 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dannybcaitlyn (Post 12534698)

Dane, Patriots had a way more injuries then we did last year. They were never fully healthy yet they trucked us.

Add up the salaries of Houston, Maclin, and Charles...That's about $36 million of player value that didn't play for us. And that's not even including Ware.

That game has a different makeup with Maclin in it. Kelce was doubled all game long...Smith was handcuffed to throwing to Avant, Wilson, and Conley the rookie.

MahiMike

11-06-2016 07:06 PM

Never knew how effective the option plays helped the run. Today we found out. Can't believe the Jags outrushed the Chiefs. Crazy.

Deberg_1990

11-20-2016 03:04 PM

Welp,

I know we are stuck with Smith for the rest of this year......but there is very obviously a 'cap' with him and its not enough.......

KCCHIEFS27

11-20-2016 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Deberg_1990 (Post 12566536)

Welp,

I know we are stuck with Smith for the rest of this year......but there is very obviously a 'cap' with him and its not enough.......

Welp, this shit argument again

BigCatDaddy

11-20-2016 03:11 PM

Make it Foles, number 1.

Discuss Thrower

11-20-2016 04:06 PM

If the chiefs perform like I think they will in losing on the road in the next two weeks and possibly losing to the lowly Titans and come into the Christmas game at 7-6...

If they lose that one to fall to 7-7, why not see if Bray is worth a shit with the starting offense?

Foles isn't the answer and Smith isn't game managing with any sort of dependability. What do they *really* have to lose at that point?

Easy 6

11-20-2016 04:14 PM

I'd be fine going to Foles at this point, the lack of scoring is horrendous and keeping turnovers to a minimum doesnt offset that... who is gonna care if Foles throws 2 picks when he also has 3 touchdowns?

oaklandhater

11-20-2016 04:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Easy 6 (Post 12567043)

I'd be fine going to Foles at this point, the lack of scoring is horrendous and keeping turnovers to minimum doesnt offset that... who is gonna care if Foles throws 2 picks when he also has 3 touchdowns?

This Foles at least has the indy game under his belt better then Alex played all year

Beef Supreme

11-20-2016 04:15 PM

I was ready to start Foles over Smith the day we acquired him.

Red Dawg

11-20-2016 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BigChiefTablet (Post 12567048)

I was ready to start Foles over Smith the day we acquired him.

So was I and next season I pray they dump Smith and do just that. Then draft a real prospect.

Mother****erJones

11-20-2016 04:27 PM

needs to be Foles going forward. Alex is dead to me now

ARROW2

11-20-2016 04:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mother****erJones (Post 12567091)

needs to be Foles going forward. Alex is dead to me now

Anybody who disagrees.............**** YOU!!!!

rabblerouser

11-20-2016 04:36 PM

I'm officially on the "Time to start Foles" bandwagon.

The knock on Alex was the lack of big plays. The upside was always "he doesn't make the big mistake." "He doesn't lose the game for us."

Well...he looked like shit last week and the D bailed him out. He played like shit today and the defense wasn't able to bail the offense out.

Well...Foles has a bigger upside than Alex. Time to start him NOW. Draft QBOTF in April. Team has peaked with Smith.

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:41 AM.

Page 108 of 114

108

Show 80 post(s) from this thread on one page