Nothing Surprising here.

MU and TAM Upgraded.

Colorado and Nebraska downgraded.

If WVU and TCU weren't in the Big 12, no other major conference would consider adding them. That's really all you need to know about whether or not they were good adds.

Neither Maisel nor Schlabach's observations factor into Saragin's ratings, therefore their opinions are moot. /Bitch

TCU upgraded? Too bad there's no one there to see it.

I also like how WV's new low standard for futility is "they lost to Kansas"

The comments on that page are hilarious. It's always the same 2 scenarios for the Big 12 apologists.

aTm and/or Mizzou struggle in the SEC? Ha ha. I told you you would be bottom feeders in the SEC.

aTm and/or Mizzou thrive in the SEC? Ha ha. I told you the SEC wasn't that good.

But Missouri has shown it can hold its own in the SEC, too.


Lulz, how long will this myth go on? They're 9-8 so far. 0-7 vs top 20 SEC teams, while their wins were over teams with a 22-50 record. The only teams they "hold their own" with are the crappy ones.

U mad? U sound mad.

Mad that Mizzou can't beat any good teams? No, I enjoy that.

But if a team is ranked when we beat them only to have them end up not ranked, does that make said team bad when we beat them?

You guys should try beating some teams. It's incredible.

You can look at the records if you prefer. Each team plays 8 SEC games.

9 wins x 8 games = 72 results. Opponents finished 22-50.
8 losses x 8 games = 64 results. Opponents finished 52-12.


There is a pattern in there but you have to look real close.

It was a rhetorical question. Nobody cares what a jilted KU trying to lessen what Missouri has done this year thinks.

Seriously. Anyone who spends his Saturdays googling Nebraska athletics attendance does not hold a valid opinion.

Here's an interesting stat. Prison Bitch has made one post in the new Kansas football thread. He has received two responses, and both told him to get the **** out.