ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs PFF: Poor game from Fisher (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=275422)

SAUTO 08-21-2013 09:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9905201)
I respect that. I do. I make fun of you because you have proven multiple times not matter how polite I am to you, and no matter how I try to be civil with you, you always find a way to insult me.

So I go with that. And I turn it on you.

you think making fun of knuckles is an insult?

I earned that shit. that's respect. Something you will never know.
Posted via Mobile Device

DJ's left nut 08-21-2013 09:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9905144)
Would you think it was smart to sign Derek Jeter to a massive deal and then move him to first base?

No, right?

If they drafted Eric Fisher to play left tackle, then move Albert to guard, trade him for whatever you can get, or move him to the right side.

Not that I disagree with your underlying point, but your analogy is bad.

RT is not first base. Maybe RG is, but RT is not. It's not as difficult as LT but requires similar skills, just less overall athleticism. If LT is SS, then RT is 3b.

Welllllll.....you may recall a pretty damn expensive acquisition with a hell of a pedigree moving into New York that just so happened to play the same position as a well established SS. He slid right on over to 3b to accommodate the incumbent at the harder position.

The problem with moving Fisher over to LT right now is that there's a pretty good chance he would get Alex Smith killed. All that kept Smith intact as guys were blasting past Fisher was the fact that he was fortunate enough to see them coming and athletic enough to get the hell out of the way.

No, moving Fisher to LT right now is not a good idea.

Mav 08-21-2013 09:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9905406)
you think making fun of knuckles is an insult?

I earned that shit. that's respect. Something you will never know.
Posted via Mobile Device

What ever you say boss.

Just like I don't know you, you sure as hell don't know me, or what I have done to earn respect. You have your way, and if to you that means being great with your fists, then props to you.

You are right. No one respects me, no one likes me, everyone hates me.

I get it.

SAUTO 08-21-2013 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9905419)
What ever you say boss.

Just like I don't know you, you sure as hell don't know me, or what I have done to earn respect. You have your way, and if to you that means being great with your fists, then props to you.

You are right. No one respects me, no one likes me, everyone hates me.

I get it.

Oh I know exactly the guy you are.

All your shit was posted here remember?
Posted via Mobile Device

saphojunkie 08-21-2013 09:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9905238)
It wouldn't matter if Fisher was good anyway drafting a right tackle 1.1 is ****ing stupid. I can't think of 1 good move Dorsey made other than drafting Nico Johnson.

Who did you want?

Mav 08-21-2013 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JASONSAUTO (Post 9905422)
Oh I know exactly the guy you are.

All your shit was posted here remember?
Posted via Mobile Device

Lol, the only current shit that was posted, was about me being subpoenaed for child support for a kid that I didn't even know about. All of that other shit, was 10 years old.

You don't know shit about me.

Its cute that you pretend you do.

Titty Meat 08-21-2013 09:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9905425)
Who did you want?

Dion Jordan

Mav 08-21-2013 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9905435)
Dion Jordan

Hes a beast. A skinny beast like mingo, but quick as hell.

Titty Meat 08-21-2013 10:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9905271)
Cmon billay

Kelce was a good pick based on upside
Nico was a good pick
Davis can turn out to be a star
Fasano, S. Smith, Avery, Devito, Hussein, Schwartz and Jordan were solid signings.

Paying what Bowe wanted so we could keep Albert was impressive.

Trading that much for Alex, taking Fisher at 1, signing Dante Robinson and going into the season with total crap at nickel corner while trading away Arenas were terrible moves...but they don't all together cancel out the good moves that have been made.

This team has been toward the bottom in sacks for years and the offense has been Bowe and Charles for 3 or 4 seasons now. The team needed more playmakers he didn't really add any.

Titty Meat 08-21-2013 10:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9905437)
Hes a beast. A skinny beast like mingo, but quick as hell.

You can stalk up on corners all you want but the correct way to beat an elite QB like Manning is to get after him.

Mav 08-21-2013 10:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9905444)
You can stalk up on corners all you want but the correct way to beat an elite QB like Manning is to get after him.

I agree. That's why the browns drafted Mingo, they signed Groves, and Kruger.

I completely agree. Now, as to who the best pass rusher was. Me, I think it was Jarvis Jones.

BossChief 08-22-2013 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9905441)
This team has been toward the bottom in sacks for years and the offense has been Bowe and Charles for 3 or 4 seasons now. The team needed more playmakers he didn't really add any.

They clearly were building around Alex Smiths game with their picks and signings.

Alex doesnt throw to receivers (past the first option, anyway) and they added a couple good tight ends and a back that might just end up being "special"...I saw flashes of real potential from Davis in camp. Larry Johnson type potential.

I disagree with the philosophy, but these guys will make plays because they operate within Alex Smiths comfort zone.

chiefzilla1501 08-22-2013 03:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9905441)
This team has been toward the bottom in sacks for years and the offense has been Bowe and Charles for 3 or 4 seasons now. The team needed more playmakers he didn't really add any.

Scheme alone is going to help a ton with that. I don't think this defense is elite by any means, but we're going to put a whole lot more pressure.

chiefzilla1501 08-22-2013 03:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9905588)
They clearly were building around Alex Smiths game with their picks and signings.

Alex doesnt throw to receivers (past the first option, anyway) and they added a couple good tight ends and a back that might just end up being "special"...I saw flashes of real potential from Davis in camp. Larry Johnson type potential.

I disagree with the philosophy, but these guys will make plays because they operate within Alex Smiths comfort zone.

I like to be an optimist. I'm not crazy about the Alex Smith pickup. The optimist view is that if Fisher turns out to be the pick he's projected to be (and I think we need to be patient), we have a solid enough team to possibly be on the bubble of a playoff win or two behind Alex Smith. But if the Chiefs keep swinging for a franchise QB the next 2-3 years and find one, this is a supporting cast good enough to be a legit deep playoff team.

keg in kc 08-22-2013 03:59 AM

Avery has playmaking potential. Kelce I think has playmaking potential. In fact, the tight end position in general has been upgraded, across the board. Knile Davis also has gamebreaking speed but needs to continue to work on several areas of his game. They did a lot more than just draft Fisher on offense, in any event.

BlackHelicopters 08-22-2013 04:28 AM

3-13

Marcellus 08-22-2013 04:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9905210)
Why am I not surprised that Marcellus and his "Andy Reid is a special offensive line coach and we should just trust him, guyz" straight up disappeared and will completely ignore this ?

Guess what asshole, I am not ignoring it and secondly I didn't say you had to trust him, I said I was going to trust him.

Philly has had some bad olines and they have had some good ones, obviously they didn't use the draft to fill most of the positions since most of those guys listed didn't play much over the 14 years or so.

If you are telling me every oline the Eagles have had sucked then you are full of shit.

keg in kc 08-22-2013 04:57 AM

Somebody got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.

chiefzilla1501 08-22-2013 05:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9905624)
Avery has playmaking potential. Kelce I think has playmaking potential. In fact, the tight end position in general has been upgraded, across the board. Knile Davis also has gamebreaking speed but needs to continue to work on several areas of his game. They did a lot more than just draft Fisher on offense, in any event.

I think people underestimate the moves at tight end and at fullback. May seem like small potatoes, but in Reid's offense, those small moves will pay huge dividends. And it's not just because Alex Smith is a checkdown guy. The variation of the packages we can now run because we have 3 TEs, all of whom can block and catch, and FBs who can catch... terrific stuff. If we're going the "49er way," they do some really crazy packages. One that's always interested me is the diamond package where you have 2 FBs and a RB.

chiefzilla1501 08-22-2013 05:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DJ's left nut (Post 9905416)
Not that I disagree with your underlying point, but your analogy is bad.

RT is not first base. Maybe RG is, but RT is not. It's not as difficult as LT but requires similar skills, just less overall athleticism. If LT is SS, then RT is 3b.

Welllllll.....you may recall a pretty damn expensive acquisition with a hell of a pedigree moving into New York that just so happened to play the same position as a well established SS. He slid right on over to 3b to accommodate the incumbent at the harder position.

The problem with moving Fisher over to LT right now is that there's a pretty good chance he would get Alex Smith killed. All that kept Smith intact as guys were blasting past Fisher was the fact that he was fortunate enough to see them coming and athletic enough to get the hell out of the way.

No, moving Fisher to LT right now is not a good idea.

I think that's a good analogy. A Guard feels like First Base, because it's just not the kind of skill position Tackle is. While I'm not crazy about taking a Tackle early, I'm glad we didn't do what the Cards and Titans did and take a Guard in the top 10. The other reason you can't call Right Tackle 1st base is, it's becoming an almost critical position. There's a great PFF article about its growing importance, and I think it's really telling when 4 offensive minded coaches (Reid, Arians, McCoy, Chip Kelly) all went after a Right Tackle.

I don't agree about Fisher at LT. Fisher would do just fine. His athleticism is fine. I'm not sure why people are questioning it. The reason he's getting beat is because he's not using his arms and hands to punch the guy off the rush, it's not because he's too slow to handle the speed. If anything, he still has to get stronger to play the Right Tackle position. Only reason I wouldn't move Fisher to Left Tackle is that I see no reason to move Albert to the Right right now.

Marcellus 08-22-2013 05:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 9905637)
Somebody got up on the wrong side of the bed this morning.

Actually I am in a great mood. :D

Sandy Vagina 08-22-2013 07:01 AM

Most seem to agree that Albert will be gone in the offseason. So what's the problem with drafting a quality OT in a draft lacking in true #1 value... playing him at a needed RT spot in year 1.. then letting him focus back on LT in the next offseason? Sure the OT transition isn't easy.. which is why they drafted a high character prospect that they feel will put in the work and improve as he develops. They clearly had scheme or talent doubts about their former RT to let him walk.

Biggest issue is, you have a LT prospect making a temporary RT transition, and he's doing it while battling through injuries. Add to that, KC naturally has lots of work to do still on getting all the OL,TE, and backs on the same page for exotic blitz pickups.

... but some are apparently freaking out and overreacting after a decent but underwhelming preseason game 1.. and a pretty awful preseason game 2 that featured uncharacteristic blitzes thrown at them. :shake:

saphojunkie 08-22-2013 10:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bo's Pelini (Post 9905435)
Dion Jordan

Well that would have been terrible.

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap100...rdans-shoulder

Quote:


Dolphins reportedly worried about Dion Jordan's status


By Marc Sessler
Published: Aug. 22, 2013 at 12:15 p.m. Updated: Aug. 22, 2013 at 12:39 p.m.

The Dolphins have said publicly they expect rookie pass rusher Dion Jordan to be ready for Miami's regular-season opener against the Cleveland Browns, but sources within the team have told Armando Salguero of The Miami Herald there is a "growing concern" the third-overall pick in April's draft won't be ready to play because of a nagging right shoulder injury.

Jordan has barely seen the field with the Dolphins because of offseason surgery on the shoulder, which continues to keep him off the field.


The defensive end played a mere seven snaps in the Hall of Fame Game, but Jordan hasn't practiced since. He won't play in Saturday's regular-season dress rehearsal against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers, either, but defensive coordinator Kevin Coyle said Wednesday he expects Jordan to be ready for the Browns on Sept. 8.

"Um, I don't have doubt," Coyle said. "I hope if he stays on target with what we're hearing and what we're seeing, he'll be ready to help us come opening day."

Salguero was told that privately, discussions have swirled around the possibility of keeping Jordan out of practice longer than planned to allow the shoulder to fully heal and gain strength. At this stage, Jordan isn't in line to start, not with end Olivier Vernon lined up across from Cameron Wake.

Croyle acknowledged "there's always going to be a plan A, plan B, plan C as you approach the season," and general manager Jeff Ireland admitted this month that Jordan's play "has a long way to go." With the regular season fast approaching, it's fair to wonder what sort of impact Jordan will bring to Miami as a rookie.
You want to draft a skinny pass rusher to be a backup to Tamba and Houston at 1.1, when the guy is injured before day one of NFL play?

Mav 08-22-2013 10:54 AM

Sapho-

And my browns don't know when they will get Mingo back now that he has been spitting up blood. So that's two of the top 6 picks...Yikes.

saphojunkie 08-22-2013 11:11 AM

Make no mistake - someone from this draft is going to end up being a guy like Clay Matthews - you look back and say "why the hell didn't we take THAT guy first overall?"

But those guys all had question marks coming out. It's just that some of those question marks get answers, and the answers are pro bowls.

Stephon Gilmore is looking like he could be one of those dudes.

Mav 08-22-2013 11:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9906058)
Make no mistake - someone from this draft is going to end up being a guy like Clay Matthews - you look back and say "why the hell didn't we take THAT guy first overall?"

But those guys all had question marks coming out. It's just that some of those question marks get answers, and the answers are pro bowls.

Stephon Gilmore is looking like he could be one of those dudes.

Oh, I can already tell you who that guy is going to be. I begged and pleaded for the Browns to take him, and yet again they let another stud end up with another divisional team. Just to let you know what I mean. We switched spots with the Ravens to let them have Haloti Ngata, and we took Kam Wimbley, we drafted Kam, but didn't draft Lawrence Timmons.

This year, we took Mingo, and let the Steelers get JARVIS JONES.

he is going to be the premiere pass rusher from this draft class.

Ace Gunner 08-22-2013 11:43 AM

mods -- please move thread to florida -- thx

Sorter 08-22-2013 12:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9905695)
Most seem to agree that Albert will be gone in the offseason. So what's the problem with drafting a quality OT in a draft lacking in true #1 value... playing him at a needed RT spot in year 1.. then letting him focus back on LT in the next offseason? Sure the OT transition isn't easy.. which is why they drafted a high character prospect that they feel will put in the work and improve as he develops. They clearly had scheme or talent doubts about their former RT to let him walk.

Biggest issue is, you have a LT prospect making a temporary RT transition, and he's doing it while battling through injuries. Add to that, KC naturally has lots of work to do still on getting all the OL,TE, and backs on the same page for exotic blitz pickups.

... but some are apparently freaking out and overreacting after a decent but underwhelming preseason game 1.. and a pretty awful preseason game 2 that featured uncharacteristic blitzes thrown at them. :shake:

None of the concepts used were particularly "exotic" or uncharacteristic. Personnel variations or specialized "rush" fronts weren't even used.

BossChief 08-22-2013 12:07 PM

Jarvis jones has a condition called spinal stenosis that will most likely cause him to retire early.

A player like that is a good fit for a team like Pittsburgh that needs an every down rushbacker, but for us...it would be a wasted pick because by the time Hali is ready to hang em up, Jarvis Jones very well be at that point, too.

Sandy Vagina 08-22-2013 12:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9906175)
None of the concepts used were particularly "exotic" or uncharacteristic. Personnel variations or specialized "rush" fronts weren't even used.

They were uncharacteristic of blitzes we are accustommed to from Fangio and SF. I didn't mean exotic or uncharacteristic in general.

saphojunkie 08-22-2013 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9906176)
Jarvis jones has a condition called spinal stenosis that will most likely cause him to retire early.

A player like that is a good fit for a team like Pittsburgh that needs an every down rushbacker, but for us...it would be a wasted pick because by the time Hali is ready to hang em up, Jarvis Jones very well be at that point, too.

Exactly. Almost every player you'd consider at 1.1 had a reason to not draft him. At the end of the day, we had typical Chiefs luck. First overall pick in a shitty ****ing draft sandwiched between once-in-a-decade talents at QB and pass rusher.

****ers.

Sorter 08-22-2013 12:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9906181)
They were uncharacteristic of blitzes we are accustommed to from Fangio and SF. I didn't mean exotic or uncharacteristic in general.

I highly doubt that given Fangio's philosophies and from what I've seen previously but I'm not going to pretend I've broken down any 49er's film recently.

saphojunkie 08-22-2013 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9906191)
I highly doubt that given Fangio's philosophies and from what I've seen previously but I'm not going to pretend I've broken down any 49er's film recently.

:clap::clap::clap::clap:

I could have sworn every poster on here did nothing but spend all day breaking down film on all 32 teams' offensive concepts, defensive concepts, play-by-play effectiveness on an individual basis, and backup player potential.

Sandy Vagina 08-22-2013 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9906191)
I highly doubt that given Fangio's philosophies and from what I've seen previously but I'm not going to pretend I've broken down any 49er's film recently.

Can't force you to believe it, but Fangio didn't blitz much. We would send 4 and an occasional 5th from the front 7, but it was rare that we sent DBs. Now what Fangio did prior to SF, I can not say.

BossChief 08-22-2013 12:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9906175)
None of the concepts used were particularly "exotic" or uncharacteristic. Personnel variations or specialized "rush" fronts weren't even used.

Not sure if you know this or not, but unless there is bad blood between the two coaches that are facing each other, head coaches commonly call each other before their teams meet in preseason to discuss what they want to come out of the game having gained and usually extend a courtesy to each other by throwing things at each other that each coach wants to see.

Todd Haley brought this up in an interview a few years back.

I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Andy asked Jim to throw a few blitzes in his book to see how the tackles and quarterback are (at this point) at identifying the blitzers (this is probably a concern of his after switching away from zone blocking) and picking them up.

I bet Andy wanted to see exactly what we saw so that he could use the tape as a teaching tool.

Maybe I'm wrong here, but I don't think I am.

Sorter 08-22-2013 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9906209)
Not sure if you know this or not, but unless there is bad blood between the two coaches that are facing each other, head coaches commonly call each other before their teams meet in preseason to discuss what they want to come out of the game having gained and usually extend a courtesy to each other by throwing things at each other that each coach wants to see.

Todd Haley brought this up in an interview a few years back.

I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Andy asked Jim to throw a few blitzes in his book to see how the tackles and quarterback are (at this point) at identifying the blitzers (this is probably a concern of his after switching away from zone blocking) and picking them up.

I bet Andy wanted to see exactly what we saw so that he could use the tape as a teaching tool.

Maybe I'm wrong here, but I don't think I am.

I am indeed aware of this.

Sorter 08-22-2013 12:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9906199)
:clap::clap::clap::clap:

I could have sworn every poster on here did nothing but spend all day breaking down film on all 32 teams' offensive concepts, defensive concepts, play-by-play effectiveness on an individual basis, and backup player potential.

I'd do it for several truckloads of cash and a lifetime supply of Hendricks.

I'd probably need to get an Adderall prescription as well after a while. Perhaps Von could hook me up?

BossChief 08-22-2013 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by saphojunkie (Post 9906189)
Exactly. Almost every player you'd consider at 1.1 had a reason to not draft him. At the end of the day, we had typical Chiefs luck. First overall pick in a shitty ****ing draft sandwiched between once-in-a-decade talents at QB and pass rusher.

****ers.

That's why trading down with Miami would have been a smart choice. Staying put at 1 and using the pick to create a log jam at offensive tackle was a complete waste.

Also, I don't buy for a second that there weren't any players worthy of the pick.

Talon Austin would have added a serious playmaker to this offense.

That's something this team is/was lacking BIG TIME.

BossChief 08-22-2013 12:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sorter (Post 9906216)
I am indeed aware of this.

I figured you would.

O.city 08-22-2013 12:40 PM

I'm not huge on tavon Austin, but I would have liked to have taken one of the better outside wrs in the second

saphojunkie 08-22-2013 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9906226)
That's why trading down with Miami would have been a smart choice. Staying put at 1 and using the pick to create a log jam at offensive tackle was a complete waste.

Also, I don't buy for a second that there weren't any players worthy of the pick.

Talon Austin would have added a serious playmaker to this offense.

That's something this team is/was lacking BIG TIME.

If Miami was willing to trade up and we didn't, then that was a huge ****ing mistake.

Tayvon Austin might end up being a legit playmaker, but you can't say the guy was any less of a risk. He's tiny. TINY. I think he's going to be a badass, but it goes back to my theory that every single person at the top had a knock on them.

Which is why people are pissed. We wanted to see the Chiefs draft for highest ceiling, not highest floor.

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9906260)
I'm not huge on tavon Austin, but I would have liked to have taken one of the better outside wrs in the second

We could have taken Tayvon #1 and Geno in the second. Dang.

Mav 08-22-2013 12:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9906176)
Jarvis jones has a condition called spinal stenosis that will most likely cause him to retire early.

A player like that is a good fit for a team like Pittsburgh that needs an every down rushbacker, but for us...it would be a wasted pick because by the time Hali is ready to hang em up, Jarvis Jones very well be at that point, too.

From what I read, that was severely misdiagnosed. Agreed that it would flash on the medical reports. But I still maintain that the guy is going to be a hell of a pass rusher even if it is for a few years.

And I agree, he wasn't a fit for the Chiefs. Hes just my pick to be the standout of this draft.

Mav 08-22-2013 12:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9906203)
Can't force you to believe it, but Fangio didn't blitz much. We would send 4 and an occasional 5th from the front 7, but it was rare that we sent DBs. Now what Fangio did prior to SF, I can not say.

He blitzed plenty last year.

What he didn't do often was send the corner, or the safeties. So that is correct. But to say he didn't blitz, he regularly sent the three down, both aldon and ahmad, and either bowman or Patrick.

Yes, we didn't blitz the safeties at all that I can recall.

Mav 08-22-2013 12:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9906226)
That's why trading down with Miami would have been a smart choice. Staying put at 1 and using the pick to create a log jam at offensive tackle was a complete waste.

Also, I don't buy for a second that there weren't any players worthy of the pick.

Talon Austin would have added a serious playmaker to this offense.

That's something this team is/was lacking BIG TIME.

Without having inside knowledge, I can guarantee that Andy Reids love fest with McCluster factored into that decision not to draft him.

Sandy Vagina 08-22-2013 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mavericks Ace (Post 9906280)
He blitzed plenty last year.

What he didn't do often was send the corner, or the safeties. So that is correct. But to say he didn't blitz, he regularly sent the three down, both aldon and ahmad, and either bowman or Patrick.

Yes, we didn't blitz the safeties at all that I can recall.

I didn't say he didn't blitz. I said he didn't blitz much. My main exhausting point was exactly the bolded.

... and no, he didn't send our ILB(s) all that often.

Mav 08-22-2013 01:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9906287)
I didn't say he didn't blitz. I said he didn't blitz much. My main exhausting point was exactly the bolded.

... and no, he didn't send our ILB(s) all that often.

I guess I don't know what much means lol. My favorite niner is Bowman, so I watch him quite a bit on defense.

BossChief 08-22-2013 01:33 PM

Miami traded from 12 to 3 with a second rounder.

Shit, I've

I'd have traded down for a 3 and next years 2.

Or just the 2 Oakland got

Or a 3 this year and a 3 next year.

Mav 08-22-2013 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9906350)
Miami traded from 12 to 3 with a second rounder.

Shit, I've

I'd have traded down for a 3 and next years 2.

Or just the 2 Oakland got

Or a 3 this year and a 3 next year.

Yeah, shocked that the Chiefs and fins didn't make a deal.

O.city 08-22-2013 01:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BossChief (Post 9906350)
Miami traded from 12 to 3 with a second rounder.

Shit, I've

I'd have traded down for a 3 and next years 2.

Or just the 2 Oakland got

Or a 3 this year and a 3 next year.

Correct me if I'm wrong here boss, but weren't you one of the guys pre draft saying we couldn't trade back for that little and had to use the draft value chart?

Setsuna 08-22-2013 02:18 PM

It's a sad day in CP history when half the pages have ignored member posts.

Sandy Vagina 08-22-2013 03:59 PM

Sounds like Fisher's more dinged up than people thought.

Quote:

Here's what we know about Fisher's injuries after this report:

-Fisher has "gamekeeper's thumb", similar to "skier's thumb". I have never heard of it but it has it's own Wikipedia page. Read about it more there but it's a ligament injury.

-There is a finger injury on the other hand. So that's injuries to both hands. It was reported by ESPN's John Clayton a while back that Fisher suffered injuries to both hands in the first few days of camp, so he could've been dealing with this for a while.

-He also has a "soft-tissue" injury in one shoulder. We knew about a shoulder injury, just not exactly what it was. This is a little more detail.

Dorsey told Rapoport that Fisher can't "fully engage 100 percent", which would help explain some of his struggles last week against the 49ers. Dorsey talked more about Fisher on 810 WHB this morning.

http://www.arrowheadpride.com/2013/8...as-city-chiefs

RealSNR 08-22-2013 04:27 PM

****. And we were counting on Fisher's ability to boost team morale at piano bars when we drafted him at #1.

aturnis 08-22-2013 07:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9906714)
Sounds like Fisher's more dinged up than people thought.

Nope. Chiefzilla said it's just one injury.

beach tribe 08-22-2013 07:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by O.city (Post 9906382)
Correct me if I'm wrong here boss, but weren't you one of the guys pre draft saying we couldn't trade back for that little and had to use the draft value chart?

I've been trying to tell people that chart is ****ing broken since the new CBA.

If we would have made that deal the majority here would have Lost Their ****ing Minds, and would have bitched about it every day since, and Dorsey would be labeled a pussy push over.

the Talking Can 08-22-2013 07:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9906714)
Sounds like Fisher's more dinged up than people thought.

#playmaker

chiefzilla1501 08-22-2013 07:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9907071)
Nope. Chiefzilla said it's just one injury.

No. I didn't. It looks like his fingers are ****ed up, and he hurt his shoulder trying to overcomepsnate.

aturnis 08-22-2013 07:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chiefzilla1501 (Post 9907181)
No. I didn't. It looks like his fingers are ****ed up, and he hurt his shoulder trying to overcomepsnate.

Like I said, he has 3 injuries. One of each hand, and his shoulder.

Hammock Parties 08-22-2013 07:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9907189)
Like I said, he has 3 injuries. One of each hand, and his shoulder.

We need an injury prone nickname that will stick.

Eric Fissure?

RealSNR 08-22-2013 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9907197)
We need an injury prone nickname that will stick.

Eric Fissure?

Eric Fishurt

Hammock Parties 08-22-2013 07:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9907217)
Eric Fishurt

http://www.garage208.com/forum/image...ine=1333556499

RealSNR 08-22-2013 08:01 PM

Consider it a gift to the Chiefs community.

I like to give back whenever I can.

Ace Gunner 08-22-2013 08:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gochiefs(exceptQB) (Post 9907226)

ROFL

chiefzilla1501 08-23-2013 12:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9907189)
Like I said, he has 3 injuries. One of each hand, and his shoulder.

I really don't give a shit. Calling a guy injury prone a few weeks into his career is about the stupidest thing I've ever heard. Especially when 3 of the top 5 picks have missed preseason games already to injury. Just because he's banged up in 3 places, doesn't mean that they're all severe. It sounds to me like the UCL tear on the thumb is the part that's really bothering him, and that's a legit injury that can happen to anyone.

Simply Red 08-23-2013 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SNR (Post 9907276)
Consider it a gift to the Chiefs community.

I like to give back whenever I can.




http://i.imgur.com/PwL8rpt.gif

aturnis 08-23-2013 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Simply Red (Post 9907842)

Where can I get one?

Simply Red 08-23-2013 12:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aturnis (Post 9907859)
Where can I get one?

http://i.imgur.com/PwL8rpt.gif

RealSNR 08-23-2013 12:54 AM

That's 94% as adorable as the lion gif.

Thanks for posting.

Red Chum 08-26-2013 08:23 AM

I don't get the hate for Fisher?

He definitely played better against the Steelers but, against the 49ers it was obvious he was favoring his right arm/hand.

When I watch the 49er game gifs, it really looks to me he's trying to protect it. It looks like he is in pain and doing the best he can.


In the first one, it's like he doesn't have much strength in that right arm.

In the second one, it's like he's trying not to use the right hand/arm at all.

The third one is the most obvious. He doesn't use his right arm at all and tries to block with his head.

The exact same thing happens in the fourth one.

loochy 08-26-2013 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Chum (Post 9916102)
I don't get the hate for Fisher?

1st overall pick

not playing well

has injury, but obviously not serious because coaches, medical staff, and others tell him to play through it

OL are injured all the time

that's why

Sandy Vagina 08-26-2013 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Chum (Post 9916102)
I don't get the hate for Fisher?

Some expect a rookie to play flawlessly in a newly implemented scheme for all offensive players while also in preseason game 2 playing with multiple injuries... all because he was drafted 1.1.

Many that have been outspokenly negative of him are still butthurt that he was the 1.1 pick to begin with... so any mistakes, and they will jump all over him.

:doh!:

BigMeatballDave 08-26-2013 08:38 AM

The hate for Fisher has much more to do than a certain player/position player that wasn't picked.

Has nothing to do with Fisher at all.

TEX 08-26-2013 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 9916132)
The hate for Fisher has much more to do than a certain player/position player that wasn't picked.

Has nothing to do with Fisher at all.

Yep. Because he's a better QB than Geno is...

L.A. Chieffan 08-26-2013 08:50 AM

DIS GUY SUX, PF CHANG TOLD ME1!

Red Chum 08-26-2013 08:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BCD (Post 9916132)
The hate for Fisher has much more to do than a certain player/position player that wasn't picked.

Has nothing to do with Fisher at all.

I see. That makes sense as to why there are so many stupid posts in this thread. All you have to do is watch his right arm in the gifs. Fisher is going to be good imo. He was the right pick.

Easy 6 08-26-2013 09:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by L.A. Chieffan (Post 9916155)
DIS GUY SUX, PF CHANG TOLD ME1!

LMAO

TEX 08-26-2013 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Red Chum (Post 9916171)
I see. That makes sense as to why there are so many stupid posts in this thread. All you have to do is watch his right arm in the gifs. Fisher is going to be good imo. He was the right pick.

I agree.

Sweet Daddy Hate 08-26-2013 03:42 PM

I don't get the hate for Fisher? Why aren't you mother****ers just ecstatic that we blew our load on a non-generational Tackle? Did linemen run a blocking sled over your puppy as a child? Sheesh!

Sandy Vagina 08-26-2013 04:55 PM

Most will appreciate Fisher even more next season. Albert leaves for the big FA money, and then you will be glad to have your LT with a year under his belt (albeit from RT, but still).

Drafting Fisher did three things.

- It allowed KC to get value at their pick in a lousy top 5 draft.
- It gives you much needed depth and a legit starter on the OL for this season.
- It gives you your LT of the future.

saphojunkie 08-26-2013 04:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sweet Daddy Hate (Post 9917311)
I don't get the hate for Fisher? Why aren't you mother****ers just ecstatic that we blew our load on a non-generational Tackle? Did linemen run a blocking sled over your puppy as a child? Sheesh!

We should have blown our load on a non-generational nickelback, backup passrusher, quarterback, or three technique defensive tackle.

jd1020 08-26-2013 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mac-NinersChiefs (Post 9917454)
Most will appreciate Fisher even more next season. Albert leaves for the big FA money, and then you will be glad to have your LT

Not likely.

Unless Albert completely sucks ass this year all you will hear is how the Chiefs let another quality player walk out the door.

Fisher is highly unlikely to make any improvement to this team. It was a 1.1 pick to maintain homeostasis, or as I like to call it... a wasted pick.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:26 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.