ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Hall of Classics (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=32)
-   -   Broken Planes & Families, and the number 159 (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=247877)

Saul Good 08-05-2011 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7803413)
Your sentences by which you told me you did not believe me, idiot! But yeah I forgot, I had to go back many pages and find you the EXACT wording. WHAT A TOTAL MORON YOU ARE!

Someone with your mental capacity should understand that having doubts and being unconvinced is not the same as believing that someone is lying.

Frankie 08-05-2011 11:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803410)
Frankie are you trying to say I'm somehow kissing Donger's ass?

ROFL What an idiot.

I'm really not, I'm only trying to point out to you how ****ing idiotic your arguments are. You can't follow simple logic, much less construct a valid or a sound argument.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803410)
BTW, "reeruned" is not a curse word, ignoramus, it's a synonym for "stunted."

What an idiot!

Which one of you accused me of not understanding someone's alleged sarcasm? I wouldn't be surprised if it was you.

Frankie 08-05-2011 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803420)
Someone with your mental capacity should understand that having doubts and being unconvinced is not. The same as believing that soneone is lying.

Someone with your mental capacity should at least make sentences that make sense.

Donger 08-05-2011 11:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7803413)
Your sentences by which you told me you did not believe me, idiot! But yeah I forgot, I had to go back many pages and find you the EXACT wording. WHAT A TOTAL MORON YOU ARE!

Actually, you didn't write "own sentences." You wrote "own sentence"

Which one was it?

Saul Good 08-05-2011 11:07 AM

Here's a rule of thumb, Frankie. If you have to tell people you're smart, you aren't smart.

Dartgod 08-05-2011 11:07 AM

Sadly, this thread has evolved into the equivelant of an internet slap fight.

Frankie 08-05-2011 11:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Radar Chief (Post 7803416)
Lets see just how much traction you get with that.

IT WAS SARCASM, YOU IDIOT!

God, I'm surrounded by them!

Frankie 08-05-2011 11:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803431)
Here's a rule of thumb, Frankie. If you have to tell people you're smart, you aren't smart.

If it makes you feel better, we'll go with that. I'm glad to play.

Frankie 08-05-2011 11:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dartgod (Post 7803432)
Sadly, this thread has evolved into the equivelant of an internet slap fight.

<iframe width="560" height="349" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/UPw-3e_pzqU" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

The only difference: Pacino is NOT talking about morons.

Donger 08-05-2011 11:12 AM

I think he's getting close...

Radar Chief 08-05-2011 11:12 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7803433)
IT WAS SARCASM, YOU IDIOT!

God, I'm surrounded by them!

Sarcasm fail.

Pants 08-05-2011 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7803421)
ROFL What an idiot.

I'm really not, I'm only trying to point out to you how ****ing idiotic your arguments are. You can't follow simple logic, much less construct a valid or a sound argument.



What an idiot!

Which one of you accused me of not understanding someone's alleged sarcasm? I wouldn't be surprised if it was you.

Wait, so you were saying I shouldn't be banned for bypassing the filter? OK, sounds good. I can't believe I didn't catch your sarcasm there. What was the point of being sarcastic about it, though? Everyone already knows that typing out the word "reeruned" is a) not avoiding the filter, and b) is not a curse word, and c) is not a bannable offense.

I still think you need to be banned for bypassing the filter.

Dartgod 08-05-2011 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803481)
I still think you need to be banned for being a ****ing moron.

FYP

Discuss Thrower 08-05-2011 11:32 AM

I'd like to thank all this thread's participants for lightening my day which was shitty because I missed my flight to Puerto Vallarta due to the pilots showing up and hour after we were scheduled for departure.

Saul Good 08-05-2011 11:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by J-Town Fan 1988 (Post 7803504)
I'd like to thank all this thread's participants for lightening my day which was shitty because I missed my flight to Puerto Vallarta due to the pilots showing up and hour after we were scheduled for departure.

This is probably a blessing in disguise. The safety of air travel has been called into question by one of the smartest human beings on the planet.

Frankie 08-05-2011 11:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803481)
I can't believe I didn't catch your sarcasm there. What was the point of being sarcastic about it, though? Everyone already knows that typing out the word "reeruned" is a) not avoiding the filter, and b) is not a curse word, and c) is not a bannable offense.

ROFL

What an idiot?!

Frankie 08-05-2011 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803519)
he safety of air travel has been called into question by one of the smartest human beings on the planet.

That really wouldn't be a feather in anybody's hat, judging by the participation of the primates in this very thread.

Pants 08-05-2011 11:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7803528)
ROFL

What an idiot?!

Remember when you agreed with my post saying that calling someone an idiot doesn't just make it so?

Would you please care to explain to me why exactly that post made you call me an idiot?

Pants 08-05-2011 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7803531)
That really wouldn't be a feather in anybody's hat, judging by the participation of the primates in this very thread.

Frankie, even the smartest man on Earth is still a primate. I'm surprised you didn't know that.

Donger 08-05-2011 11:56 AM

Closer...

Donger 08-05-2011 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803535)
Frankie, even the smartest man on Earth is still a primate. I'm surprised you didn't know that.

LMAO

Saul Good 08-05-2011 12:01 PM

I just re-read the OP, and it just gets dumber every time.

A jet drives off a runway, careens down a hill and into a field, and has its fuselage break in two as a result. Frankie's take? "Holy shit! Good thing that plane wasn't 36,000 feet in the air when that happened".

What a ****ing dunce. Does he just own the stupid thread? Of course not. After being called on his stupidity, how does he respond? By doubling down, naturally: "It could have been metal fatigue that caused the damage."

After being properly ridiculed for his obstinance, he not only clings to his "the guy who just received a lethal injection may have actually died from cancer" argument, he proceeds to claim to be one of the smartest people on the mother****ing planet.

Now, we all know that some of the smartest people on the mother****ing planet post here regularly, but they are the drafturbators. They are the ones who pimp Taylor Mays, Vernon Ghoulston, and Jimmy Clausen. To my knowledge, Frankie is not a member of that club of 4 minus 1.

As a result, we have a 50+ page thread that will stand as a monument to Frankie's intellect. Take from that what you will.

Saul Good 08-05-2011 12:19 PM

Http://travel.yahoo.com/p-interests-40548163
Evidently, the odds of a flight-related accident are 1 in 1,600,000. In other words, if fuselages are prone to spontaneously snap in half, it has been a rare phenomenon as of late. In yet other words, we're overdue.

Huffmeister 08-05-2011 12:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803551)
I just re-read the OP, and it just gets dumber every time.

A jet drives off a runway, careens down a hill and into a field, and has its fuselage break in two as a result. Frankie's take? "Holy shit! Good thing that plane wasn't 36,000 feet in the air when that happened".

What a ****ing dunce. Does he just own the stupid thread? Of course not. After being called on his stupidity, how does he respond? By doubling down, naturally: "It could have been metal fatigue that caused the damage."

After being properly ridiculed for his obstinance, he not only clings to his "the guy who just received a lethal injection may have actually died from cancer" argument, he proceeds to claim to be one of the smartest people on the mother****ing planet.

Now, we all know that some of the smartest people on the mother****ing planet post here regularly, but they are the drafturbators. They are the ones who pimp Taylor Mays, Vernon Ghoulston, and Jimmy Clausen. To my knowledge, Frankie is not a member of that club of 4 minus 1.

As a result, we have a 50+ page thread that will stand as a monument to Frankie's intellect. Take from that what you will.

You forgot the part where he claimed that he was talking about the Aloha flight the whole time, even though he never mentioned it until after someone else brought it up.

threebag 08-05-2011 12:36 PM

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...79um4jZ2eRUIxw

Ya that's the ticket

fan4ever 08-05-2011 12:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803519)
This is probably a blessing in disguise. The safety of air travel has been called into question by one of the smartest human beings on the planet.

Well done.:clap:

fan4ever 08-05-2011 12:45 PM

Guys I think it's time to let Frankie make like his avatar and ride off into the sunset. He's forever damaged any credibility he ever had; we should just let it go at that.

go bo 08-05-2011 01:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7795517)
Frankie, if you stop acting like you're smarter than everyone else while posting proof of the complete opposite, maybe people wouldn't laugh at you so much. It's nothing personal, man.

You honestly thought BossChief's post was serious? You didn't detect even a hint of sarcasm? When people started to make fun of your uninformed, sensationalistic claim in OP (which was obviously based solely on the picture), you made up an argument that didn't exist (the "indestructible" part). I'm trying to help you understand why people don't give you the credit you think you deserve.

The only argument I remember having with you was about your extremely selfish posting style (when you come back and reply post by post to a thread that has already moved on beyond that point) so I don't know where this whole "agenda" against you theory is coming from, at least as far as I'm concerned.

well, shit...

i guess i'm a selfish poster then because i do this all the time, like right now...

Pants 08-05-2011 01:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by go bowe (Post 7803698)
well, shit...

i guess i'm a selfish poster then because i do this all the time, like right now...

You have to post at least 4 more posts in a row to qualify, gobowe. Sorry. :)

Saul Good 08-05-2011 01:26 PM

Actually, this thread never really moved on.

Pants 08-05-2011 01:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803706)
Actually, this thread never really moved on.

That's true.

Saul Good 08-05-2011 01:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803708)
That's true.

You might say its been in a holding pattern for about 50 pages.

Donger 08-05-2011 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 7803709)
You're obsessed with this whole "make Frankie look like a douche" thing, aren't you?
Posted via Mobile Device

He seems quite capable of doing that himself.

Pants 08-05-2011 01:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803716)
You might say its been in a holding pattern for about 50 pages.

LMAO

Pants 08-05-2011 01:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 7803741)
Takes two to tango.

It seems to me that a wide variety of people, (Frankie included) are so obsessed with making one-another look stupid that the only thing that's been accomplished in this gigantic, moronic thread is the world's largest barrel of Summer's Eve.

Are you white-knighting or just observing?

Donger 08-05-2011 01:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 7803741)
Takes two to tango.

It seems to me that a wide variety of people, (Frankie included) are so obsessed with making one-another look stupid that the only thing that's been accomplished in this gigantic, moronic thread is the world's largest barrel of Summer's Eve.

Sure, though you'll note I kindly suggested to Frankie that he simply issue a mea culpa and just laugh the train wreck he created. He chose not to take that advice and instead dug in his heel.

threebag 08-05-2011 02:00 PM

Instead of summers eve it's more like fleet.

threebag 08-05-2011 02:01 PM

http://t3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...lQqmitN27lKZ5Q

Mr_Tomahawk 08-05-2011 02:05 PM

How does this article have 750+ replies?

Pants 08-05-2011 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 7803817)
How does this article have 750+ replies?

It's the way of ChiefsPlanet.

Saul Good 08-05-2011 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 7803839)
LMAO
Not knighting in the least. I'm just throwing out an observation. Every time I think this thread is dead... Boom! back on the top. It's been fairly entertaining and all but a lot of the anti-Frankie posts are remarkably douche-tastic.




Oh yeah... I saw that. You gave plenty of outs. It just won't die, though.

If this thread doesn't hit 1000, the terrorists win. /no bigot

RNR 08-05-2011 02:42 PM

This is truly amazing. I have hung around this place for 10 years and I do not recall a pile on lasting this long. I agree with many here that the claims of 159 and 167 intelligence quotient scores are rather silly or at least far fetched. I would suggest that if true Frankie should submit his, and his sons name to this list~
http://palscience.com/science/the-wo...artest-people/

These smartest people were picked based on their IQ (Intelligence quotient) test. IQ, is a score derived from one of several different standardized tests designed to assess intelligence. The purpose of the test is measure the mental ability and horse power of the brain for any person. I have noticed that many of these people are Chess players and champions. I don’t know if there is any link between intelligence and chess, but this is my observations. Many of my resources confirmed the name and the IQ score for each of the people on the list. There were couple of other names with high IQ score but I couldn’t really confirm that 100%. Note: All these people are still alive as of 2010.

IQ scores reflect general capacity for performing intellectual tasks, such as solving verbal and mathematical problems.

The average IQ score is 100. The standard deviation of IQ scores is 15. So, this means:
50% of people have IQ scores between 90 and 110
2.5% of people are very superior in intelligence (over 130)
2.5% of people are mentally deficient / impaired / reeruned (under 70)
0.5% of people are near genius or genius (over 140)

Genius IQ is generally considered to begin around 140 to 145, representing ~.25% of the population (1 in 400). Here’s a rough guide:
115-124 – Above average (e.g., university students)
125-134 – Gifted (e.g., post-graduate students)
135-144 – Highly gifted (e.g., intellectuals)
145-154 – Genius (e.g., professors)
155-164 – Genius (e.g., Nobel Prize winners)
165-179 – High genius
180-200 – Highest genius
>200 – “Unmeasurable genius”

So, here is what I came up with. Please comment of you have any suggestions.

1. Kim Ung-Yong – IQ = 210

Yong is a Korean child prodigy. He showed his intelligent ability since he was little. He started speaking at 6 months, he was able to read Japanese, Korean, German, English and many other language by his third birthday. At age 3, he was able to solve complicated calculus equations easily with no problems. He got his Ph.D. in physics at Colorado State University when he was 16 years old. Kim has the highest score in the planet, he was listed in the Guinness Book of World Records under “Highest IQ”; the book estimated the boy’s score at over 210.

2. Christopher Michael Langan – IQ = 195

“The Smartest Man In America“, thats what the media called him when he scored 195 on the IQ test. Langan was born in San Francisco and spent most of his early life in Montana. He began talking at six months, taught himself to read before he was four, and was repeatedly skipped ahead in school. During high school he started teaching him self, advanced physics, math, philosophy, Greek and Latin. Then he went to college but dropped out because he thought he could teach the professor more than they could teach him. for over 20 years he worked several jobs, he worked as construction worker, cowboy, forest service firefighter, and farmhand. In 2004, Langan moved with his wife Gina (née LoSasso), a clinical neuropsychologist, to northern Missouri, where he owns and operates a horse ranch. On January 25, 2008, Langan was a contestant on NBC’s 1 vs. 100, where he won $250,000.



3. Philip Emeagwali – IQ = 190

Emeagwali was born in Akure, Nigeria on 23 August 1954. He dropped out of school in 1967 because of the Nigerian-Biafran war. He became an engineer and computer scientist/geologist who was one of two winners of the 1989 Gordon Bell Prize, a prize from the IEEE, for his use of a Connection Machine supercomputer to help analyze petroleum fields. in 1991, He was studying for his PhD degree, but his thesis was rejected by committee of internal and external examiners and thus he was not awarded the degree.



4. Garry Kasparov – IQ = 190

Garry Kasparov is the World Chess Champion. He was born on April 13 1963 in Russia. Kasparov became the youngest ever undisputed World Chess Champion in 1985 at the age of 22. He held the official FIDE world title until 1993, when a dispute with FIDE led him to set up a rival organization, the Professional Chess Association. He continued to hold the “Classical” World Chess Championship until his defeat by Vladimir Kramnik in 2000. Kasparov announced on March 10, 2005, that he would retire from serious competitive chess. He cited as the reason a lack of personal goals in the chess world. Garry wasn’t only an excellent chess player, he wrote several books related to chess.



5. Marilyn Vos Savant – IQ = 186

Born in St.Louis Missouri on August 11, 1946, she is an American magazine columnist, author, lecturer, and playwright who rose to fame through her listing in the Guinness Book of World Records under “Highest IQ”. Since 1986 she has written Ask Marilyn, a Sunday column in Parade magazine in which she solves puzzles and answers questions from readers on a variety of subjects. Vos Savant studied philosophy at the Washington University in St. Louis despite her parents’ desire for a more useful subject. After two years, she dropped out to help with a family investment business, seeking financial freedom to pursue a career in writing. You can visit her official website here.

6. John H. Sununu – IQ = 180

Born on July 2, 1939 in Havana, Cuba. He was the former Governor of New Hampshire (1983–89) and former White House Chief of Staff under President George H. W. Bush. His father’s family came to the United States from the Middle East at the beginning of the twentieth century. Most of the last two generations of Sununus were also born in the United States. Most of his closest relatives in Beirut have died, including a relative who returned to the Lebanese capital from the United States several years ago.



7. Judit Polgár – IQ = 170

Judit is a Hungarian chess grandmaster. She is by far the strongest female chess player in history. In 1991, she achieved the title of Grandmaster (GM) at the age of 15 years and 4 months. Judit in her own words “In 1991, I became Chess Grandmaster, breaking Bobby Fischer’s record as youngest grandmaster in history at the time. On four occasions, I played on the Hungarian men’s Olympic chess team, and we won a silver medal in 2002. I have defeated world chess champions Spassky, Karpov, Kasparov, Topalov and Anand at international tournaments, matches and rapid tournaments. I have been the world’s No. 1 woman chess player for nearly 20 years straight, since 1989. Among men, I was ranked 8th in 2005. I was awarded the Chess Oscar seven times, and was elected Woman Chess Player of the Century.” Visit here website.



8. Stephen Hawking – IQ = 160

Stephen is a British theoretical physicist, whose world-renowned scientific career spans over 40 years. His books and public appearances have made him an academic celebrity and he is an Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts. Hawking’s key scientific works to date have included providing, with Roger Penrose, theorems regarding singularities in the framework of general relativity, and the theoretical prediction that black holes should emit radiation, which is today known as Hawking radiation (or sometimes as Bekenstein-Hawking radiation). Hawking has a neuro-muscular dystrophy that is related to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a condition that has progressed over the years and has left him almost completely paralyzed.

Just I wanted to mention another name I stumbled upon while researching the topic.




William James Sidis – IQ = 250

April 1, 1898 – July 17, 1944. Was an American child prodigy with exceptional mathematical and linguistic abilities. He became famous first for his precocity, and later for his eccentricity and withdrawal from the public eye. He avoided mathematics entirely in later life, writing on other subjects under a number of pseudonyms. With an estimated ratio IQ of over 250, he is often cited as one of the most intelligent people who ever lived. Although the University had previously refused to let his father enroll him at age nine because he was still a child, Sidis set a record in 1909 by becoming the youngest person to enroll at Harvard College. He was 11 years old, and entered Harvard as part of a program to enroll gifted students early

Saul Good 08-05-2011 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 7803868)
Ahhh....

I did not know there was a post count goal on this one...

I'll bet Frankie's email inbox is well over size limit by now.

He's had his box stuffed repeatedly for the better part of a week, now. /no homo

Saul Good 08-05-2011 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RedNeckRaider (Post 7803889)
This is truly amazing. I have hung around this place for 10 years and I do not recall a pile on lasting this long. I agree with many here that the claims of 159 and 167 intelligence quotient scores are rather silly or at least far fetched. I would suggest that if true Frankie should submit his, and his sons name to this list~
http://palscience.com/science/the-wo...artest-people/

These smartest people were picked based on their IQ (Intelligence quotient) test. IQ, is a score derived from one of several different standardized tests designed to assess intelligence. The purpose of the test is measure the mental ability and horse power of the brain for any person. I have noticed that many of these people are Chess players and champions. I don’t know if there is any link between intelligence and chess, but this is my observations. Many of my resources confirmed the name and the IQ score for each of the people on the list. There were couple of other names with high IQ score but I couldn’t really confirm that 100%. Note: All these people are still alive as of 2010.

IQ scores reflect general capacity for performing intellectual tasks, such as solving verbal and mathematical problems.

The average IQ score is 100. The standard deviation of IQ scores is 15. So, this means:
50% of people have IQ scores between 90 and 110
2.5% of people are very superior in intelligence (over 130)
2.5% of people are mentally deficient / impaired / reeruned (under 70)
0.5% of people are near genius or genius (over 140)

Genius IQ is generally considered to begin around 140 to 145, representing ~.25% of the population (1 in 400). Here’s a rough guide:
115-124 – Above average (e.g., university students)
125-134 – Gifted (e.g., post-graduate students)
135-144 – Highly gifted (e.g., intellectuals)
145-154 – Genius (e.g., professors)
155-164 – Genius (e.g., Nobel Prize winners)
165-179 – High genius
180-200 – Highest genius
>200 – “Unmeasurable genius”

So, here is what I came up with. Please comment of you have any suggestions.

1. Kim Ung-Yong – IQ = 210

Yong is a Korean child prodigy. He showed his intelligent ability since he was little. He started speaking at 6 months, he was able to read Japanese, Korean, German, English and many other language by his third birthday. At age 3, he was able to solve complicated calculus equations easily with no problems. He got his Ph.D. in physics at Colorado State University when he was 16 years old. Kim has the highest score in the planet, he was listed in the Guinness Book of World Records under “Highest IQ”; the book estimated the boy’s score at over 210.

2. Christopher Michael Langan – IQ = 195

“The Smartest Man In America“, thats what the media called him when he scored 195 on the IQ test. Langan was born in San Francisco and spent most of his early life in Montana. He began talking at six months, taught himself to read before he was four, and was repeatedly skipped ahead in school. During high school he started teaching him self, advanced physics, math, philosophy, Greek and Latin. Then he went to college but dropped out because he thought he could teach the professor more than they could teach him. for over 20 years he worked several jobs, he worked as construction worker, cowboy, forest service firefighter, and farmhand. In 2004, Langan moved with his wife Gina (née LoSasso), a clinical neuropsychologist, to northern Missouri, where he owns and operates a horse ranch. On January 25, 2008, Langan was a contestant on NBC’s 1 vs. 100, where he won $250,000.



3. Philip Emeagwali – IQ = 190

Emeagwali was born in Akure, Nigeria on 23 August 1954. He dropped out of school in 1967 because of the Nigerian-Biafran war. He became an engineer and computer scientist/geologist who was one of two winners of the 1989 Gordon Bell Prize, a prize from the IEEE, for his use of a Connection Machine supercomputer to help analyze petroleum fields. in 1991, He was studying for his PhD degree, but his thesis was rejected by committee of internal and external examiners and thus he was not awarded the degree.



4. Garry Kasparov – IQ = 190

Garry Kasparov is the World Chess Champion. He was born on April 13 1963 in Russia. Kasparov became the youngest ever undisputed World Chess Champion in 1985 at the age of 22. He held the official FIDE world title until 1993, when a dispute with FIDE led him to set up a rival organization, the Professional Chess Association. He continued to hold the “Classical” World Chess Championship until his defeat by Vladimir Kramnik in 2000. Kasparov announced on March 10, 2005, that he would retire from serious competitive chess. He cited as the reason a lack of personal goals in the chess world. Garry wasn’t only an excellent chess player, he wrote several books related to chess.



5. Marilyn Vos Savant – IQ = 186

Born in St.Louis Missouri on August 11, 1946, she is an American magazine columnist, author, lecturer, and playwright who rose to fame through her listing in the Guinness Book of World Records under “Highest IQ”. Since 1986 she has written Ask Marilyn, a Sunday column in Parade magazine in which she solves puzzles and answers questions from readers on a variety of subjects. Vos Savant studied philosophy at the Washington University in St. Louis despite her parents’ desire for a more useful subject. After two years, she dropped out to help with a family investment business, seeking financial freedom to pursue a career in writing. You can visit her official website here.

6. John H. Sununu – IQ = 180

Born on July 2, 1939 in Havana, Cuba. He was the former Governor of New Hampshire (1983–89) and former White House Chief of Staff under President George H. W. Bush. His father’s family came to the United States from the Middle East at the beginning of the twentieth century. Most of the last two generations of Sununus were also born in the United States. Most of his closest relatives in Beirut have died, including a relative who returned to the Lebanese capital from the United States several years ago.



7. Judit Polgár – IQ = 170

Judit is a Hungarian chess grandmaster. She is by far the strongest female chess player in history. In 1991, she achieved the title of Grandmaster (GM) at the age of 15 years and 4 months. Judit in her own words “In 1991, I became Chess Grandmaster, breaking Bobby Fischer’s record as youngest grandmaster in history at the time. On four occasions, I played on the Hungarian men’s Olympic chess team, and we won a silver medal in 2002. I have defeated world chess champions Spassky, Karpov, Kasparov, Topalov and Anand at international tournaments, matches and rapid tournaments. I have been the world’s No. 1 woman chess player for nearly 20 years straight, since 1989. Among men, I was ranked 8th in 2005. I was awarded the Chess Oscar seven times, and was elected Woman Chess Player of the Century.” Visit here website.



8. Stephen Hawking – IQ = 160

Stephen is a British theoretical physicist, whose world-renowned scientific career spans over 40 years. His books and public appearances have made him an academic celebrity and he is an Honorary Fellow of the Royal Society of Arts. Hawking’s key scientific works to date have included providing, with Roger Penrose, theorems regarding singularities in the framework of general relativity, and the theoretical prediction that black holes should emit radiation, which is today known as Hawking radiation (or sometimes as Bekenstein-Hawking radiation). Hawking has a neuro-muscular dystrophy that is related to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a condition that has progressed over the years and has left him almost completely paralyzed.

Just I wanted to mention another name I stumbled upon while researching the topic.




William James Sidis – IQ = 250

April 1, 1898 – July 17, 1944. Was an American child prodigy with exceptional mathematical and linguistic abilities. He became famous first for his precocity, and later for his eccentricity and withdrawal from the public eye. He avoided mathematics entirely in later life, writing on other subjects under a number of pseudonyms. With an estimated ratio IQ of over 250, he is often cited as one of the most intelligent people who ever lived. Although the University had previously refused to let his father enroll him at age nine because he was still a child, Sidis set a record in 1909 by becoming the youngest person to enroll at Harvard College. He was 11 years old, and entered Harvard as part of a program to enroll gifted students early

10. Frankie - IQ = 159

Thinks airliners can break in half in mid-flight. Uses emoticons liberally and has a deep fascination with the Lone Ranger.

Pants 08-05-2011 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803906)
10. Frankie - IQ = 159

Thinks airliners can break in half in mid-flight. Uses emoticons liberally and has a deep fascination with the Lone Ranger.

I wonder what Frankie's son does. He'd probably be a chess grandmaster if he wanted, but, honestly, that peasant game bores him to death.

Saul Good 08-05-2011 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803913)
I wonder what Frankie's son does. He'd probably be a chess grandmaster if he wanted, but, honestly, that peasant game bores him to death.

Like Marilyn Vos Savant, his son also writes an advice column.

http://www.theonion.com/articles/ask...onvince,19354/

evenfall 08-05-2011 03:04 PM

How amusing. Einstein 159 claims he is just as smart as Stephen Hawking.

evenfall 08-05-2011 03:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803913)
I wonder what Frankie's son does. He'd probably be a chess grandmaster if he wanted, but, honestly, that peasant game bores him to death.

We only know he is damn sure not an aerospace engineer.

Saul Good 08-05-2011 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evenfall (Post 7803963)
How amusing. Einstein 159 claims he is just as smart as Stephen Hawking.

Somewhere, Stephen Hawking is claiming to be just as smart as Frankie. The mod on the Berkeley Center for Theoretical Physics message board has changed his moniker from "Hawkster" to "Frankie 159".

Hawkster erroneously posted that a muon is not classified as a lepton. It was an honest mistake, and the rest of the board had a good-natured chuckle at his expense. Hawkster took it too far and claimed that he was as smart as Frankie, and the dogpile ensued.

Frankie 08-05-2011 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803535)
Frankie, even the smartest man on Earth is still a primate. I'm surprised you didn't know that.

Oh hell, you know what I mean. You're smart enough. Allegedly.

threebag 08-05-2011 03:22 PM

http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...FD-XCJkmtwgBRw

Frankies new avatar

Pants 08-05-2011 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804014)
Oh hell, you know what I mean. You're smart enough. Allegedly.

I know what you were trying to say.

I was simply expressing my surprise that someone with your intellect and knowledge did not know that humans are of the Primates order.

Donger 08-05-2011 03:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804014)
Oh hell, you know what I mean. You're smart enough. Allegedly.

Did you know that all humans are primates, Frankie?

Frankie 08-05-2011 03:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803551)
I just re-read the OP, and it just gets dumber every time.

It just did.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803551)
A jet drives off a runway, careens down a hill and into a field, and has its fuselage break in two as a result. Frankie's take? "Holy shit! Good thing that plane wasn't 36,000 feet in the air when that happened".

That's not what I said. I said something in what I considered to be a general terms. Some folks took as specific and based on that, not missing a beat, started their customary insults and shit tossing. I may have been mistaken in thinking that my "general" term was not going to be understood well. But the resident assholes just HAD to disregard that possibility and attack. Sorry dude. Like calling me, say, a ****ing dunce.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803551)
What a ****ing dunce. Does he just own the stupid thread? Of course not. After being called on his stupidity, how does he respond?

1- There's NOTHING to own. At worst it's a misunderstanding in an insignificant "news" thread. If not for the butt-hurt of some of the usual clowns in past "debates" with me, this should have gone no more than 30 posts. And, BTW, note when I came in.

2- Gee I call people on their "mistake," not their "stupidity." Not until enough malice and name-callings is directed at me.

That's the difference between someone civilized and cavemen. And that last point has absolutely NOTHING to do with geography.

Dave Lane 08-05-2011 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803913)
I wonder what Frankie's son does. He'd probably be a chess grandmaster if he wanted, but, honestly, that peasant game bores him to death.

You have an infraction coming for talking about a family member! I got one last week. DaFace do your thing

Pants 08-05-2011 03:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804058)
That's the difference between someone civilized and cavemen. And that last point has absolutely NOTHING to do with geography.

Or you could have acted like a man. You could have been intellectually honest, admitted that you got a little carried away with your OP and everyone would just go "Oh lol, it's just ol' Frankie being Frankie."

threebag 08-05-2011 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7804069)
Or you could have acted like a man. You could have been intellectually honest, admitted that you got a little carried away with your OP and everyone would just go "Oh lol, it's just ol' Frankie being Frankie."

This. Frankie is usually a pretty good sport. But this has just 'plane' got out of hand.

Donger 08-05-2011 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804058)
1- There's NOTHING to own. At worst it's a misunderstanding in an insignificant "news" thread. If not for the butt-hurt of some of the usual clowns in past "debates" with me, this should have gone no more than 30 posts. And, BTW, note when I came in.

You mean this?

Structural fatigue vs air (no matter how aerodynamic) and vibration can create a similar failure.

You chose to double-down.

TimeForWasp 08-05-2011 03:48 PM

I can't believe this thread has almost 10,000 views. :hmmm:

Frankie 08-05-2011 03:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Saul Good (Post 7803582)
Http://travel.yahoo.com/p-interests-40548163
Evidently, the odds of a flight-related accident are 1 in 1,600,000. In other words, if fuselages are prone to spontaneously snap in half, it has been a rare phenomenon as of late. In yet other words, we're overdue.

Fuselages can break up mid air if they are not maintained right. I was generally questioning some airliners maintenance practices.

If there were any mistake on my part it was in my wording. But I will not leave unanswered ridicules by half-wits who did not give THAT a little thought in their blind rush to "prove" THIS "FERNER" is less intelligent than them. That's why I'm still here and adamant in seeing it through.

I learned long ago on this forum that I cannot afford to embolden the chimps.

Pants 08-05-2011 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804083)
Fuselages can break up mid air if they are not maintained right. I was generally questioning some airliners maintenance practices.

Then why did you link an article discussing an accident that had NOTHING to do with airline maintenance practices?

Frankie 08-05-2011 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Huffmeister (Post 7803593)
You forgot the part where he claimed that he was talking about the Aloha flight the whole time, even though he never mentioned it until after someone else brought it up.

Another genius chimes in. :rolleyes: You didn't read my posts that addressed that, did you. Or did you read them and did not understand?

threebag 08-05-2011 03:52 PM

No way in hell this fuselage that you have pictured breaks up like this no matter the maintenance. It would take an outside variable or inside if the sandals get lit.

Frankie 08-05-2011 03:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fan4ever (Post 7803634)
Guys I think it's time to let Frankie make like his avatar and ride off into the sunset. He's forever damaged any credibility he ever had; we should just let it go at that.

Credibility is in the mind of the beholder. And it's well affected by the said beholder's petty instincts such as, envy, bigotry, etc.

kstater 08-05-2011 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804083)
Fuselages can break up mid air if they are not maintained right. I was generally questioning some airliners maintenance practices.

If there were any mistake on my part it was in my wording. But I will not leave unanswered ridicules by half-wits who did not give THAT a little thought in their blind rush to "prove" THIS "FERNER" is less intelligent than them. That's why I'm still here and adamant in seeing it through.

I learned long ago on this forum that I cannot afford to embolden the chimps.

Which airliners?

Donger 08-05-2011 03:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804083)
Fuselages can break up mid air if they are not maintained right.

The chances of a commercial aircraft having a catastrophic fuselage failure (like the one you posted in the OP) are so incredibly unlikely (as demonstrated in it never happening in 80 years of flight) that you having an IQ of 159 is more likely.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804083)
I was generally questioning some airliners maintenance practices.

Errr, the aircraft accident you posted wasn't caused by poor maintenance.

Donger 08-05-2011 03:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804099)
envy

LMAO

threebag 08-05-2011 03:58 PM

The failure is in the middle of the 43 section. There are no join areas remotely close to the damaged area. Maintenance had absolutely nothing to do with this incident.

Frankie 08-05-2011 04:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gonzo (Post 7803709)
You're obsessed with this whole "make Frankie look like a douche" thing, aren't you?
Posted via Mobile Device

Oh Donger has been buzzing around me like a fly around a doughnut for years. He does have an obsession with me. A good 90% of my posts get this treatment from him.

Actually, strangely enough, he was a lot more charming earlier - even to the point of admiring my Shakespearean quotes. ROFL Then he was shocked to find out I was not a female poster. That's when his attitude changed.

Comedic, no?

Pants 08-05-2011 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804122)
Oh Donger has been buzzing around me like a fly around a doughnut for years. He does have an obsession with me. A good 90% of my posts get this treatment from him.

Actually, strangely enough, he was a lot more charming earlier - even to the point of admiring my Shakespearean quotes. ROFL Then he was shocked to find out I was not a female poster. That's when his attitude changed.

Comedic, no?

Donger can certainly be a tool, but he's smart. You're not smart, Frankie.

Donger 08-05-2011 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804122)
Oh Donger has been buzzing around me like a fly around a doughnut for years. He does have an obsession with me. A good 90% of my posts get this treatment from him.

Actually, strangely enough, he was a lot more charming earlier - even to the point of admiring my Shakespearean quotes. ROFL Then he was shocked to find out I was not a female poster. That's when his attitude changed.

Comedic, no?

Wow, that's just plain creepy. How did you ever come up with that?

Frankie 08-05-2011 04:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr_Tomahawk (Post 7803817)
How does this article have 750+ replies?

:D
The usual cavemen thought it was a good idea to insult and ridicule.

threebag 08-05-2011 04:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 7804131)
Wow, that's just plain creepy. How did you ever come up with that?

Damn.

kstater 08-05-2011 04:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804122)
Oh Donger has been buzzing around me like a fly around a doughnut for years. He does have an obsession with me. A good 90% of my posts get this treatment from him.

Actually, strangely enough, he was a lot more charming earlier - even to the point of admiring my Shakespearean quotes. ROFL Then he was shocked to find out I was not a female poster. That's when his attitude changed.

Comedic, no?

Why would Donger think you're a female?

Frankie 08-05-2011 04:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7803913)
I wonder what Frankie's son does. He'd probably be a chess grandmaster if he wanted, but, honestly, that peasant game bores him to death.

He's looking for a job as a lawyer. Has passed the bar and everything. He's even been advised to remove his Mensa membership from his resume. Because one potential employer, who's an idiot like you, has already wondered, "If he has such a high IQ, why is he looking for a job with us?!" :rolleyes:

It would be funny if it were not so sad and pathetic, like your posts and your fellow cavemen in this thread.

Frankie 08-05-2011 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by evenfall (Post 7803963)
How amusing. Einstein 159 claims he is just as smart as Stephen Hawking.

Yet another genius chimes in repeating the redundancy of idiocy already tried in this thread. What a shock!

Saul Good 08-05-2011 04:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804083)
Fuselages can break up mid air if they are not maintained right. I was generally questioning some airliners maintenance practices.

If there were any mistake on my part it was in my wording. But I will not leave unanswered ridicules by half-wits who did not give THAT a little thought in their blind rush to "prove" THIS "FERNER" is less intelligent than them. That's why I'm still here and adamant in seeing it through.

I learned long ago on this forum that I cannot afford to embolden the chimps.

As ridiculous as your claim would have been if your headline stood on its own, the additional commentary you added to the OP completely proves that you are lying.

"This" is defined in your OP as the airliner breaking in half.

You are a four year old with chocolate all over your face and crumbs on your shirt denying that you snuck a cookie. Your denial is so pathetic that it is completely pathetic, embarrassing even.

You're never going to be able to convince anyone that you didn't eat the cookie. You don't have to. I expect a four year old to sneak cookies every now and then, and I expect you to say stupid things regularly. It comes with the territory. The lie is worse than the stupidity, and your crocodile tears over false claims of bigotry are reprehensible.

Frankie 08-05-2011 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pants (Post 7804022)
I know what you were trying to say.

I was simply expressing my surprise that someone with your intellect and knowledge did not know that humans are of the Primates order.

Who said I did not know that. Oh, wait, the voices in your head. ROFL

kstater 08-05-2011 04:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Einstein 159 (Post 7804147)
He's looking for a job as a lawyer. Has passed the bar and everything. He's even been advised to remove his Mensa membership from his resume. Because one potential employer, who's an idiot like you, has already wondered, "If he has such a high IQ, why is he looking for a job with us?!" :rolleyes:

It would be funny if it were not so sad and pathetic, like your posts and your fellow cavemen in this thread.

What law school did he go to?

Frankie 08-05-2011 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by threebag02 (Post 7804077)
This. Frankie is usually a pretty good sport. But this has just 'plane' got out of hand.

I'm a pretty good sport all the time. But some posters here have a history with me. They, I don't feel to sporty with.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:14 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.