ChiefsPlanet

ChiefsPlanet (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/index.php)
-   Nzoner's Game Room (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/forumdisplay.php?f=1)
-   -   Chiefs SCHEFTER- Crennel to Chiefs Imminent (https://chiefsplanet.com/BB/showthread.php?t=221244)

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-12-2010 02:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6437969)
Okay. The commonly-accepted definition of intelligence is the ability to learn and/or cope with new situations and ideas. In other words, innate ability.

Intelligence isn't learned; you either have it or you don't.

I suggest you study post-structuralism before sticking to such concrete definitions.

DeezNutz 01-12-2010 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6437976)
You know, you wouldn't always have to shout that during the act if you'd stick a few fingers inside along with your pinky-sized dingus.

In fairness, the screen capture didn't really do me justice.

keg in kc 01-12-2010 02:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6437982)
In fairness, the screen capture didn't really do me justice.

Q-tip sized?

Sorry, dude. I didn't know.

BradyFTW! 01-12-2010 02:03 PM

FWIW, pretty much every Pats fan that I know was hoping that we'd be able to get Crennel back.

beach tribe 01-12-2010 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6437920)

Consistent idiots who show know desire or ability to learn are killed with fire.

It's that simple.

Oh my god you are a fuqin moron. lol

J/K BTW

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-12-2010 02:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradyFTW! (Post 6437989)
FWIW, pretty much every Pats fan that I know was hoping that we'd be able to get Crennel back.

kill yourself.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-12-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6437993)
Oh my god you are a fuqin moron. lol

THAT JUST HAPPENED!

DeezNutz 01-12-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by keg in kc (Post 6437986)
Q-tip sized?

Sorry, dude. I didn't know.

It's not about having the best phallus, keg; it's about having the right phallus.

Donger 01-12-2010 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6437979)
I suggest you study post-structuralism before sticking to such concrete definitions.

I never studied architecture.

The Bad Guy 01-12-2010 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradyFTW! (Post 6437989)
FWIW, pretty much every Pats fan that I know was hoping that we'd be able to get Crennel back.

Why would you even want him back? Look at the posters on here. They all know how much of just a yes man he was to Bill. I'm shocked Patriots fans, who watched this guy for years, don't know that already.

keg in kc 01-12-2010 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6437999)
It's not about having the best phallus, keg; it's about having the right phallus.

That's the phallus way.

OnTheWarpath15 01-12-2010 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6437999)
It's not about having the best phallus, keg; it's about having the right phallus.

http://i28.tinypic.com/k0gcnb.jpg

FAX 01-12-2010 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BradyFTW! (Post 6437989)
FWIW, pretty much every Pats fan that I know was hoping that we'd be able to get Crennel back.

This cannot be.

Surely, "every Pats fan that you know" is confined to your sister and her friend, Mr. BradyFTW!. For, it is common knowledge among the informed that Crennel's appearance in Kansas City is like unto the anti-Christ whose agenda includes the destruction of the world, the benching of our best players, and no blitzing.

FAX

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-12-2010 02:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6438001)
I never studied architecture.

Mildly funny.

dirk digler 01-12-2010 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6437999)
It's not about having the best phallus, keg; it's about having the right phallus.

I am shocked you even have one :D

Jerm 01-12-2010 02:07 PM

Saw on Twitter that his agent has come out and said that the Giants are on hold, Chiefs get the first shot, and that contract details are being ironed out.

Sweet.
Posted via Mobile Device

ToxSocks 01-12-2010 02:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 6438009)
Saw on Twitter that his agent has come out and said that the Giants are on hold, Chiefs get the first shot, and that contract details are being ironed out.

Sweet.
Posted via Mobile Device

Great News!

DeezNutz 01-12-2010 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6438007)
I am shocked you even have one :D

CoMo must have typed your post. ;)

dirk digler 01-12-2010 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 6438009)
Saw on Twitter that his agent has come out and said that the Giants are on hold, Chiefs get the first shot, and that contract details are being ironed out.

Sweet.
Posted via Mobile Device

That sucks I was hoping for the return of GROB

petegz28 01-12-2010 02:09 PM

They had better sign this ****er. There is no excuse as to why they shouldn't other that total incompetence.

Donger 01-12-2010 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6438006)
Mildly funny.

Perhaps you've already done so, but have you ever stated what would please with you with regards to the Chiefs? Specifically, who you would want as:

1) GM

2) HC

3) OC

4) DC

BigChiefFan 01-12-2010 02:11 PM

Yeah, we wouldn't want a 3-4 coach to run the
3-4. We also don't like coordinators, who coached Super Bowl winners, because 40 years without sniffing one, has made us picky.

beach tribe 01-12-2010 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6437997)
THAT JUST HAPPENED!

In case you haven't noticed, and I've had to try, and explain this to Dane before, I'm not on here 24 fuqin 7 the way you are. You try to say, I am but I'm not. I started reading back there because I was working, and couldn't keep up with the thread. How the hell do you stay on here all the time BTW? What do you do during the day? How do you get anything done.
Don't get me wrong. I can get on here, and be here for a while, but there is never a time that I'm on here for more than 15 min, that you are not.
Actually tell me when you're not here, so I can actually discuss some topics without getting into a verbal altercation.

Micjones 01-12-2010 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6437965)
Mic I hope you take a step back and evaluate everything the "4horsemen" said during last offseason. As someone who argued aginst them I gotta say for the most part they were correct, however were they right long term about Cassel? That remains to be seen it'll probably be somewhere in between.

Not sure I can applaud it when everyone (non-4H members included) knew this team wouldn't amount to much in terms of wins and losses.

Micjones 01-12-2010 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6437973)
I have no words.

The next piece of Chiefs news oughta cure that.

SAUTO 01-12-2010 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6438038)
In case you haven't noticed, and I've had to try, and explain this to Dane before, I'm not on here 24 fuqin 7 the way you are. You try to say, I am but I'm not. I started reading back there because I was working, and couldn't keep up with the thread. How the hell do you stay on here all the time BTW? What do you do during the day? How do you get anything done.
Don't get me wrong. I can get on here, and be here for a while, but there is never a time that I'm on here for more than 15 min, that you are not.
Actually tell me when you're not here, so I can actually discuss some topics without getting into a verbal altercation.


LMAO sad that it's that way around here, one of the 4 have to be here every minute. there can be NO positivity without punishment

DaWolf 01-12-2010 02:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerm (Post 6438009)
Saw on Twitter that his agent has come out and said that the Giants are on hold, Chiefs get the first shot, and that contract details are being ironed out.

Sweet.
Posted via Mobile Device

Crennel to KC; Time to re-Fewell? »

By Ralph Vacchiano

Romeo Crennel put the Giants on hold today as he attempts to work out details on a deal with the Kansas City Chiefs. And that could leave the Giants with only one remaining option: Convincing Perry Fewell to say “No” to the Chicago Bears.

Crennel is “giving K.C. the first shot,” his agent, Joe Linta, said this afternoon. The Chiefs were always the 62-year-old defensive whiz’s first choice, and he told the Giants that when they contacted him on vacation last week. He told them again last night before he officially started negotiating a contract to become the Chiefs’ next defensive coordinator.

There were two reasons for that, according to a source familiar with his thinking. One was because of his long-time relationship with Chiefs GM (and former Patriots GM) Scott Pioli. And the other was because of the demanding nature of Tom Coughlin and the long hours he requires of all his assistant coaches.

That is now something that Fewell has to decide if he’s interested in, because it’s starting to look like he’s the top choice - - and, maybe, the only remaining legitimate candidate - - for the job. Jim Haslett, whom the Giants reached out to over the weekend, appears to be headed to Washington to become Mike Shanahan’s defensive coordinator. And Mike Zimmer, another long-shot possibility, signed a new deal to stay on as the defensive coordinator in Cincinnati.

That leaves Fewell, the only man known to have interviewed for the Giants’ job. He also interviewed with the Bears on Monday and then returned home to consider his options. According to his agent, he did not receive an offer from either team. However, according to one source familiar with the situation, he believes he will get an offer from one or both teams as soon as he lets them know if he’s interested.

When will that be? Maybe not until tomorrow. But stay tuned.

Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/blogs/gia...#ixzz0cQonFJDw

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-12-2010 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6438023)
Perhaps you've already done so, but have you ever stated what would please with you with regards to the Chiefs? Specifically, who you would want as:



1) GM: Eric DeCosta or Doug Whaley

2) HC: Pete Carmichael.

3) OC: Joe Philbin, Clarence Shelmon, or Hue Jackson

4) DC: Sean McDermott (a 4-3 guy who runs a Johnson/Spagnuolo defense)

KC kid 01-12-2010 02:24 PM

Something is really jacked up if the Chiefs don't get this done.

DaWolf 01-12-2010 02:25 PM

Quote:

There were two reasons for that, according to a source familiar with his thinking. One was because of his long-time relationship with Chiefs GM (and former Patriots GM) Scott Pioli. And the other was because of the demanding nature of Tom Coughlin and the long hours he requires of all his assistant coaches.
I wonder if this is where the "Clancy keeping his job and helping out Crennel" theory comes in?

OnTheWarpath15 01-12-2010 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6438040)
Not sure I can applaud it when everyone (non-4H members included) knew this team wouldn't amount to much in terms of wins and losses.

Yeah, because the final record was the only thing discussed here since January...

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-12-2010 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6438038)
In case you haven't noticed, and I've had to try, and explain this to Dane before, I'm not on here 24 fuqin 7 the way you are. You try to say, I am but I'm not. I started reading back there because I was working, and couldn't keep up with the thread. How the hell do you stay on here all the time BTW? What do you do during the day? How do you get anything done.
Don't get me wrong. I can get on here, and be here for a while, but there is never a time that I'm on here for more than 15 min, that you are not.
Actually tell me when you're not here, so I can actually discuss some topics without getting into a verbal altercation.

I teach. No classes on Tuesdays. Shockingly, I wasn't on here yesterday morning and late afternoon.

Donger 01-12-2010 02:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6438063)
1) GM: Eric DeCosta or Doug Whaley

2) HC: Pete Carmichael.

3) OC: Joe Philbin, Clarence Shelmon, or Hue Jackson

4) DC: Sean McDermott (a 4-3 guy who runs a Johnson/Spagnuolo defense)

Thanks. So, are any of those chaps available right now (or were they last year)?

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-12-2010 02:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6438068)
Thanks. So, are any of those chaps available right now (or were they last year)?

I chose all of those b/c they are available now.

Had you asked me last year, I would have had the same GM choices, Shanahan as a HC choice, or a package deal of Schwartz and Chuck Cecil as HC DC.

Micjones 01-12-2010 02:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6438066)
Yeah, because the final record was the only thing discussed here since January...

Of course it wasn't, but that's ultimately that's how NFL teams are measured.
And it's been a hot topic around here.

Otherwise, what did any of you say that none of the rest of us saw coming? Don't worry...I'll wait.

L.A. Chieffan 01-12-2010 02:29 PM

Crennel is better than Pendergast.
Posted via Mobile Device

Chiefnj2 01-12-2010 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6438075)
I chose all of those b/c they are available now.

Had you asked me last year, I would have had the same GM choices, Shanahan as a HC choice, or a package deal of Schwartz and Chuck Cecil as HC DC.

DeCosta is available?

kcxiv 01-12-2010 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6437956)
That assumes I've ever paid attention to that smack.
I haven't, but carry on.



I'm sure I said that somewhere. Now if we could only find it...



Because if you opt to give the new regime time and are slower to form such concrete opinions...it means you haven't engaged in critical thought.
:rolleyes:



I've learned that it's impossible to argue with people who don't use logic as a standard of measurement.

The thing thats funny is that, the NFL is a negative league. Teams and players are losers more then winners, so when you got negative fans always talking shit, they are going to be right more then they are wrong, because NFL teams are set up to fail. At least 75-80 percent of them.

There is no sense in trying to argue with guys like Hamas. He just goes off on crazy anger rants. Just let him go off.

OnTheWarpath15 01-12-2010 02:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Micjones (Post 6438078)
Of course it wasn't, but that's ultimately that's how NFL teams are measured.
And it's been a hot topic around here.

Otherwise, what did any of you say that none of the rest of us saw coming? Don't worry...I'll wait.

Oh, I "think it's pretty obvious."

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-12-2010 02:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6438085)
DeCosta is available?

Everybody's got a price.

Donger 01-12-2010 02:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6438075)
I chose all of those b/c they are available now.

Had you asked me last year, I would have had the same GM choices, Shanahan as a HC choice, or a package deal of Schwartz and Chuck Cecil as HC DC.

How do you know that "they are available"? For example, I was just reading about Carmichael. Sounds like he turned down the OC position at Miami twice because he wanted to stay in NOLA. And, he was just promoted to OC of the Saints.

That's "available" in your mind?

I guess Shanahan was "available" last year to be HC of the Chiefs, but do we know that he wanted to coach here? I suppose Pioli should have hit him on the head with a shovel, put him in a burlap sack and forced him to coach in KC?

OnTheWarpath15 01-12-2010 02:38 PM

I have an appointment on campus I need to get to, so Hamas, if you'd like to take care of Mic's question quickly, so he doesn't get his panties in a bunch, feel free.

Otherwise, I'll cover it tonight when I get home and he'll have to wait for the answer he already knows.

dirk digler 01-12-2010 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chiefnj2 (Post 6438085)
DeCosta is available?

Yes he was in the running for the Seahawks GM gig until they hired Carroll.

Titty Meat 01-12-2010 02:39 PM

I still don't see how 4-12 is such a horrible record for a rookie head coach who took over a mess. There was a few wins left out there too.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-12-2010 02:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6438106)
How do you know that "they are available"? For example, I was just reading about Carmichael. Sounds like he turned down the OC position at Miami twice because he wanted to stay in NOLA. And, he was just promoted to OC of the Saints.

That's "available" in your mind?

I guess Shanahan was "available" last year to be HC of the Chiefs, but do we know that he wanted to coach here? I suppose Pioli should have hit him on the head with a shovel, put him in a burlap sack and forced him to coach in KC?

Considering it's a much more prestigious and high-paying job?

Yes.

DaWolf 01-12-2010 02:42 PM

Doug Whaley gets extra credit due to his propensity to forward "inappropriate" emails to assistant coaches who decide to forward them to league execs... :)

DaWolf 01-12-2010 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dirk digler (Post 6438117)
Yes he was in the running for the Seahawks GM gig until they hired Carroll.

From what I understand, he took his name out of the running there as the Ravens are making a push to guarantee him the GM job once Newsome steps aside, which is getting closer to reality apparently. He was mentioned here as a possibility last year and would have been my first or second choice, definitely preferred him over Polian's kid.

The other guy rumored was Mark Dominik. who I wasn't too sure about. He probably keeps Herm around if he got hired. Whether he's going to be a good GM or not, we'll see, but Tampa wasn't very good either last year...

HemiEd 01-12-2010 02:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The Bad Guy (Post 6437889)
You will hear about it tomorrow as BRC and I have said since last night. He's agreed to come, but wants a nice financial package, which Clark is going to give.

Not possible, I keep hearing that Clark is a cheapskate, and doesn't care about this team. Is Romeo going to do some sidework for the soccer team, or what?

beach tribe 01-12-2010 02:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6438075)
I chose all of those b/c they are available now.

Had you asked me last year, I would have had the same GM choices, Shanahan as a HC choice, or a package deal of Schwartz and Chuck Cecil as HC DC.

Just Curious. When one of your students asks a question that you feel he should know the answer to, do you call him a fuqin moron?

Titty Meat 01-12-2010 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 6438138)
Not possible, I keep hearing that Clark is a cheapskate, and doesn't care about this team. Is Romeo going to do some sidework for the soccer team, or what?

40 years no super bowl appearance.

Carl Peterson 5 year plan worked for the Chiefs for 20 years.


You don't know what you're talking about shut the **** up.

TheGuardian 01-12-2010 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by HemiEd (Post 6438138)
Not possible, I keep hearing that Clark is a cheapskate, and doesn't care about this team. Is Romeo going to do some sidework for the soccer team, or what?

heh.............

TigerPig 01-12-2010 02:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6438145)
40 years no super bowl appearance.

Carl Peterson 5 year plan worked for the Chiefs for 20 years.


You don't know what you're talking about shut the **** up.

88-93 was nice. We won playoff games! :)

The problem was he had no 10 year plan when he started, or 20 year plan. He should have been canned around 95 when was out of ideas.

Titty Meat 01-12-2010 02:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by TigerPig (Post 6438151)
88-93 was nice. We won playoff games! :)

The problem was he had no 10 year plan when he started, or 20 year plan. He should have been canned around 95 when was out of ideas.

Carl should have been fired when Marty left. He was given a blank check and set this franchise back years. Lamar Hunt wouldn't fire his friends thats why the Chiefs had such horrible drafts.

beach tribe 01-12-2010 02:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6438063)
1) GM: Eric DeCosta or Doug Whaley

2) HC: Pete Carmichael.

3) OC: Joe Philbin, Clarence Shelmon, or Hue Jackson

4) DC: Sean McDermott (a 4-3 guy who runs a Johnson/Spagnuolo defense)

Just my 2cents (and yes hamas, I know it's not worth two cents to you)

Weis>Philbin, Shelmon, Jackson

Crennel>>>>>>McDermott

I'll give/take a mulligan on the others.

beach tribe 01-12-2010 02:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6438145)
40 years no super bowl appearance.

Carl Peterson 5 year plan worked for the Chiefs for 20 years.


You don't know what you're talking about shut the **** up.

Nice Hamas impression.

Too bad you're credentials are way too shot to pull it off for real.

I mean you still have a picture of Mike Brown. Are you trying to remind everyone of how absolutely wrong you were?

Titty Meat 01-12-2010 02:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6438167)
Nice Hamas impression.

Too bad you're credentials are way too shot to pull it off for real.

I mean you still have a picture of Mike Brown. Are you trying to remind everyone of how absolutely wrong you were?

Let's not debate the facts that were presented or anything.


And unlike you I can admit to being wrong, Coward.

beach tribe 01-12-2010 02:57 PM

LOL wait that's not mike brown is it?


THAT's how associated you are with him......or is it?

beach tribe 01-12-2010 02:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6438171)
Let's not debate the facts that were presented or anything.


And unlike you I can admit to being wrong, Coward.

I admitted I was wrong in this thread pussy. watch. I'll go find it..

Hootie 01-12-2010 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6437499)
That's why he's avoiding the question.

He realized something was up, did a quick search and found that I've said next to nothing about Crennell, (nothing more than that I'm not as excited as I am about Weis) and am actually pretty pleased about the Weis hire.

Another classic case of lumping people together instead of actually reading and comprehending what people have to say.

you know what they say...guilt by association

when you follow the same band around all year and slap hands and talk about how awesome you are and how smart you are about football...

you are bound to be lumped in with the same ****ing people...

I still consider Dane/OTWP/Hamas to be the same poster...Mecca is a strange breed...I think he truly has his own opinions though he is a cynic...and I truly believe he knows a SHIT TON about college football (unlike the other 3)...which is why the other 3 don't ever call him out...if he disagrees with them they just avoid it because they don't want to get clowned by someone who knows more than them...even though I don't think Mecca would ever call out Hamas...

Titty Meat 01-12-2010 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6438172)
LOL wait that's not mike brown is it?


THAT's how associated you are with him......or is it?

It's obvious you have no clue what the **** you are talking about.

How are the Hunts not responsible for the mess this franchise is in? Go ahead i'm waiting.

beach tribe 01-12-2010 03:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6437771)
Yes I did.

I apologize.

Admitted I was wrong right here smart guy.

beach tribe 01-12-2010 03:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6438179)
It's obvious you have no clue what the **** you are talking about.

How are the Hunts not responsible for the mess this franchise is in? Go ahead i'm waiting.

Just pointing out that you shouldn't be bashing someone for being wrong when you have shown a track record of it.

DeezNutz 01-12-2010 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6438145)
40 years no super bowl appearance.

Carl Peterson 5 year plan worked for the Chiefs for 20 years.


You don't know what you're talking about shut the **** up.

I think Hemi was primarily being tongue-in-cheek, billllaay.

Cease fire! Cease fire! FFS.

Titty Meat 01-12-2010 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beach tribe (Post 6438188)
Just pointing out that you shouldn't be bashing someone for being wrong when you have shown a track record of it.

I have a track record for being wrong? Really? Go ahead and bump the Big 12 Football prediction thread, bigguy. I was wrong on 1 player who was one of the better safeties in the league for most of this decade.

Titty Meat 01-12-2010 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6438189)
I think Hemi was primarily being tongue-in-cheek, billllaay.

Cease fire! Cease fire! FFS.

Oh gud becuz Clark Hunt is awesome!1!!

Titty Meat 01-12-2010 03:05 PM

Beach Tribes new name is Diatribe BTW.

Donger 01-12-2010 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6438126)
Considering it's a much more prestigious and high-paying job?

Yes.

Well, the Miami job was more prestigious and probably higher paying, and he turned it down twice.

So, again, what makes you think he was available to the Chiefs?

HemiEd 01-12-2010 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6438145)
40 years no super bowl appearance.

Carl Peterson 5 year plan worked for the Chiefs for 20 years.


You don't know what you're talking about shut the **** up.

I don't? Well I have been here for the whole 40, how about you n00b?

Clark has clearly demonstrated that he is willing to bring in the best management and coaching talent he can hire.

Now you just shut the **** up, and listen for once. You just might learn something.

Titty Meat 01-12-2010 03:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6438210)
Well, the Miami job was more prestigious and probably higher paying, and he turned it down twice.

So, again, what makes you think he was available to the Chiefs?

I disagree that the Miami job is more prestigious at the time the head coaching position was open there were questions about who the new owner was going to be.

'Hamas' Jenkins 01-12-2010 03:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6438210)
Well, the Miami job was more prestigious and probably higher paying, and he turned it down twice.

So, again, what makes you think he was available to the Chiefs?

HC vs. OC. It's not hard.

Now ask another inane question.

HemiEd 01-12-2010 03:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DeezNutz (Post 6438189)
I think Hemi was primarily being tongue-in-cheek, billllaay.

Cease fire! Cease fire! FFS.

No, he can fire away, he is trying to get his own pony.

Donger 01-12-2010 03:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by billay (Post 6438219)
I disagree that the Miami job is more prestigious at the time the head coaching position was open there were questions about who the new owner was going to be.

Being offensive coordinator isn't more prestigious than quarterback coach?

Mr. Plow 01-12-2010 03:14 PM

There is a lot of anger in this thread for some reason.

Donger 01-12-2010 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 'Hamas' Jenkins (Post 6438224)
HC vs. OC. It's not hard.

Now ask another inane question.

Do you even know if he wants to be HC? Isn't going from a quarterback coach to HC a rather large step?

Has that ever even happened before?

Bill Lundberg 01-12-2010 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mr. Plow (Post 6438233)
There is a lot of anger in this thread for some reason.

SIT THE **** DOWN AND SHUT THE **** UP

The Bad Guy 01-12-2010 03:18 PM

Hamas,

Eric DeCosta turned down the Seahawks to interview there because he's the GM in waiting in Baltimore. With how much Newsome wants to go back to his roots, there's no way he was coming here.

You really wanted the Saints OC as HC? For how much I hear that Romeo was the yes man for Bill, isn't Pete the yes man for Sean Payton?

McDermott created turnovers this year, but his defense was pretty awful as a whole. He could never figure out the MLB problem, the secondary was absolutely gashed the last half of the year.

Messier 01-12-2010 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6438244)
Do you even know if he wants to be HC? Isn't going from a quarterback coach to HC a rather large step?

Has that ever even happened before?



Andy Reid did it.

BigCatDaddy 01-12-2010 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Donger (Post 6438244)
Do you even know if he wants to be HC? Isn't going from a quarterback coach to HC a rather large step?

Has that ever even happened before?

Yes, and it failed miserably this last time it happened in Washington.

Micjones 01-12-2010 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kcxiv (Post 6438090)
The thing thats funny is that, the NFL is a negative league. Teams and players are losers more then winners, so when you got negative fans always talking shit, they are going to be right more then they are wrong, because NFL teams are set up to fail. At least 75-80 percent of them.

There is no sense in trying to argue with guys like Hamas. He just goes off on crazy anger rants. Just let him go off.

I don't bother arguing with any of them anymore.
OTWP wasn't always like this though. I will say that in fairness to him.

Micjones 01-12-2010 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OnTheWarpath58 (Post 6438091)
Oh, I "think it's pretty obvious."

Uh huh.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:02 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.