![]() |
The line could use an infusion. Definitely need to get under the hood and find a long term solution at LT and possibly RG. NTM that we go into the season with an injured/poss. suspended Rice and Worthy as WR 1 and 2. Kelce aging and could retire. Pacheco is injury prone with no viable backup. That scares absolutely nobody. The offense was and is a mess.
|
They drafted 4 offensive lineman in the last two years for a reason. Gotta see these guys to the field. We really need to see Suamataia and Morris on the field and you at least hope Nourzad becomes something
|
Quote:
Sounds reasonable enough. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Well, you know, sometimes guys just can't cut it out on the island, but they'll do fine in a phone booth. Crow's right, at least the earlier picks need to show something.
But I wouldn't stop drafting OL. In THIS draft, I want a DT to complement Jonesy, and a couple of OL and maybe a RB and that is my list. BUT-that's because this draft is pretty good for those spots. Really, you just need to stack good football players. |
Would you trade our 2nd to move up for Simmons?
Seems reasonable, considering we have #66. |
Quote:
I start with Minnesota at 24. Always seem to be willing to move around. You can give them 31 and swap 66 for 97 (comp) and maybe get there. Else 63 for 97. Depends on the charts used. Who above them might be partners? Green Bay maybe though they don't trade down a lot. Probably gotta give up a 63 or 66 and might get a 4th 123 back. Los Angeles Chargers? Probably not Pittsburgh? Probably not, they tend to move up but not down Denver? Probably not, hell they may want to move up to get their TE Arizona? Possibly, they have a GM now that likes to move but they have a lot of picks this year. 63 won't likely get you to 16 though. Probably have to add in pick #95. We might get pick #153 back from them with that. Atlanta? They are in a sweet spot in that they probably want to move down for more picks with only having 4 (1, 2, 4, 7). That's a for sure 31, 63, and 95 move though. Better be sure about that one. Overall, I've realized that you probably have to wait and see what makes it to Minnesota. If you like a guy, you pounce. It won't cost a fortune to change spots with them. If you end up giving up 63 and getting back 97, you are still getting a top-100 player and you still have some really good ammo to move around yet. |
Quote:
|
The idea that's holding weight in my brain right now is that if we sign a veteran LT in FA, the Chiefs should draft Donovan Jackson in round 1.
He can start at OG right now and he can back up the LT position. He's got the size you want for either spot. I don't think many would flinch in the drafturbator community either. He's tied for 17th in Zeurlein's scoring (17-23 all carry a 6.40 grade), he's 34th on Brugler's board, and carries a top-45 grade almost everywhere I've checked. I know it takes away from my theory that some of our other youth needs to see the field, but if I look at 2026 instead of the immediate, you could have LG Jackson, RG Suamataia, and RT Morris all on the field. Foods for thought. |
Quote:
It wouldn't take much for him to end up being the 2nd best guy on a lot of draft boards when the pick comes up through the middle 2nd. That's how slides happen. I wouldn't consider it a given, but I think there's a coinflip chance it happens and yeah, I'd be real happy to have him at that point. But I don't have him on the board in 1. Would end up going DL or CB instead. |
Quote:
Tetairoa McMillan WR Colston Loveland TE Ashton Jeanty RB Josh Simmons OT Man, that would be incredible!:thumb: |
Quote:
If somehow it happened, watch out AFC West bc we’re dialed in for the next 5 years. |
This place would shit a brick if we traded up to 15 for a RB, and so would I honestly.
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:23 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.